Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[trajectories] Add PiecewiseConstantCuravtureTrajectory #22214

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mshalm
Copy link

@mshalm mshalm commented Nov 19, 2024

Adding a trajectory type modeling concatenation of linear segments and circular arcs within a plane, to be used in curvilinear joints (#22196).

The trajectory is intended to eventually model the transform between inboard and outboard frames $X_{FM}$ for the curvilinear joint, and it's design was driven by that intended use case.


This change is Reviewable

Adding a trajectory type modeling concatenation of linear segments
and circular arcs within a plane, to be used in curvilinear joints
(RobotLocomotion#22196).
Copy link
Contributor

@rpoyner-tri rpoyner-tri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good day, @mshalm . I’m assigning +@amcastro-tri as the most relevant team member to assist with this pull request. If you already had a different team member in mind, please let us know. To @amcastro-tri , feel free to delegate in case there is someone else more suitable.

Reviewable status: LGTM missing from assignee amcastro-tri, needs platform reviewer assigned, needs at least two assigned reviewers, missing label for release notes (waiting on @mshalm)

@mshalm
Copy link
Author

mshalm commented Nov 19, 2024

Good day, @mshalm . I’m assigning +@amcastro-tri as the most relevant team member to assist with this pull request. If you already had a different team member in mind, please let us know. To @amcastro-tri , feel free to delegate in case there is someone else more suitable.

Reviewable status: LGTM missing from assignee amcastro-tri, needs platform reviewer assigned, needs at least two assigned reviewers, missing label for release notes (waiting on @mshalm)

Happy for Alejandro to review! @sherm1 and @joemasterjohn-TRI may also be good reviewers.

@rpoyner-tri rpoyner-tri added the release notes: feature This pull request contains a new feature label Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rpoyner-tri rpoyner-tri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+(release notes: feature)

Reviewable status: LGTM missing from assignee amcastro-tri, needs platform reviewer assigned, needs at least two assigned reviewers

@sherm1
Copy link
Member

sherm1 commented Nov 25, 2024

@amcastro-tri, Matt asked me about review progress on this PR. Rico assigned you -- feel free to reassign if you don't have time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release notes: feature This pull request contains a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants