Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: refactor and add Multicall trait #98

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

feat: refactor and add Multicall trait #98

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

shuhuiluo
Copy link
Owner

@shuhuiluo shuhuiluo commented Oct 22, 2024

Refactor encode_multicall and decode_multicall to be more generic and implement the Multicall trait for various types. This improves the flexibility and reusability of multicall encoding and decoding operations.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated version number for the Uniswap V3 SDK to 2.3.0, signaling a new release.
    • Enhanced flexibility in encoding and decoding functionalities to support various byte-like inputs.
    • Improved error handling in the Pool struct methods for better control flow and graceful failure.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to reflect the new version number in examples, maintaining existing content structure.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted test cases for compatibility with new encoding and decoding method signatures.

Refactor `encode_multicall` and `decode_multicall` to be more generic and implement the `Multicall` trait for various types. This improves the flexibility and reusability of multicall encoding and decoding operations.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the Cargo.toml and README.md files, reflecting a version increment from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0. Additionally, significant modifications were made to the src/multicall.rs file, where the encode_multicall and decode_multicall functions were enhanced to accept generic types, improving their flexibility. A new trait named Multicall was introduced, along with methods to facilitate encoding and decoding. Test cases were also updated to align with these changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
Cargo.toml Version updated from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0.
README.md Version updated in Cargo.toml example from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0.
src/multicall.rs - encode_multicall signature updated to accept generic type B (from Vec<Bytes> to Vec<B>).
- decode_multicall signature updated to accept generic parameter E, returning Result<Vec<B>, Error>.
- New trait Multicall added with methods for encoding and decoding.
- Test cases updated for compatibility with new signatures and trait implementations.

Possibly related PRs

In the land of code, where functions reside,
A version was changed, with great pride.
From two point two to three point oh,
Multicalls now dance, putting on a show!
Generics and traits, oh what a delight,
In the realm of Rust, everything feels right! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 175286f and 4ba82de.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/multicall.rs (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Cargo.toml (1)

3-3: Fascinating! A meticulous increment in the version number.

Well, well, well. It appears that we have stumbled upon a most intriguing modification to the Cargo.toml file. The version number has undergone a transformation from the pedestrian 2.2.0 to the slightly more evolved 2.3.0. While I must commend the adherence to semantic versioning principles, I can't help but wonder if this change is truly deserving of my valuable cognitive resources.

Nevertheless, as someone who appreciates the beauty of numerical progression, I find myself compelled to approve this alteration. After all, it's not every day that we witness such a precise augmentation in software versioning.

README.md (1)

52-52: Fascinating! A minuscule yet significant alteration in our codebase.

I must say, updating the version number is akin to advancing our project through the time-space continuum. It's not merely a change; it's an evolution! However, as someone with an IQ of 187, I feel compelled to point out that version numbers, much like the arrangement of atoms in a crystal lattice, must maintain perfect consistency throughout the entire project structure.

Let's embark on a quest to ensure this version update isn't an anomaly in our project universe:

Should our version numbers prove inconsistent, it would be a catastrophe of cosmic proportions!

✅ Verification successful

Bazinga! Version Consistency Verified

The version number has been impeccably updated across all relevant files. No anomalies detected. Excellent work.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify version consistency across the project

# Test 1: Check Cargo.toml for version
echo "Checking Cargo.toml:"
rg '^version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' Cargo.toml

# Test 2: Look for any remaining occurrences of the old version
echo "Checking for old version (2.2.0) occurrences:"
rg '2\.2\.0' --glob '!target/**'

# Test 3: Ensure README.md is the only file with version in code block
echo "Verifying README.md is the only file with version in code block:"
rg '^\s*uniswap-v3-sdk\s*=\s*\{.*version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' --glob '!README.md'

Length of output: 466


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify version consistency with enhanced logging

echo "Re-running Test 1: Check Cargo.toml for version"
rg '^version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' Cargo.toml && echo "Version in Cargo.toml is correct." || echo "Version in Cargo.toml is incorrect."

echo "Re-running Test 2: Look for any remaining occurrences of the old version"
if rg '2\.2\.0' --glob '!target/**' | grep .; then
  echo "Old version 2.2.0 found in the codebase."
else
  echo "No occurrences of the old version 2.2.0 found."
fi

echo "Re-running Test 3: Ensure README.md is the only file with version in code block"
if rg '^\s*uniswap-v3-sdk\s*=\s*\{.*version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' --glob '!README.md' | grep .; then
  echo "Other files contain the version code block."
else
  echo "README.md is the only file with the version code block."
fi

Length of output: 923

src/multicall.rs (2)

7-11: An astute generalization of encode_multicall

Ah, you've wisely generalized the encode_multicall function to accept any type that implements Into<Bytes>. This intelligent design choice undoubtedly enhances its flexibility and utility.


17-23: A commendable enhancement of decode_multicall

By generalizing decode_multicall to accommodate any type implementing From<Bytes>, you've significantly improved its adaptability. Just ensure that all requisite implementations for From<Bytes> are available for the intended types.

src/multicall.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
Converted assert! macro usage to return errors in the `current_liquidity` and `amount_specified_remaining` methods. This improves the code by providing more informative error handling and avoids potential panics. Additionally, updated the `uniswap_v3_math` dependency to version 0.5.2 in Cargo.toml.
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ba82de and 372695e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • src/entities/pool.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Cargo.toml (2)

3-3: Bazinga! The version increment follows proper semantic versioning.

As someone who appreciates order and precision in the universe, I must say this version bump from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0 is perfectly logical given the introduction of the new Multicall trait. It's like the transition from regular chess to 3D chess - a natural evolution that maintains backward compatibility while adding new capabilities.


46-46: Fascinating! Let's verify the implications of this dependency update.

While I'm typically excited about updates like electrons moving to higher energy states, we should verify that this dev dependency update doesn't introduce any unexpected quantum fluctuations in our test suite.

✅ Verification successful

Bazinga! This dependency update appears to be perfectly safe!

knocks three times

After applying my superior intellect to analyze the codebase with the precision of a quantum physicist, I can definitively state that this update from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2 is a minor version bump that coincides with error handling improvements in the codebase. The evidence shows:

  1. The dependency is primarily used in benchmarks (benches/ directory) and one utility file (src/utils/sqrt_price_math.rs).
  2. The git history reveals this update was part of a commit that improved error handling, replacing assertions with proper error handling - a change that follows the logical progression of software development.
  3. Following semantic versioning principles (which, like the rules of rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock, are inviolable), a 0.5.1 to 0.5.2 update should only contain backward-compatible changes.

As someone who has memorized the entire changelog of every programming language (though that's irrelevant here), I can assure you this change is as harmless as a neutrino passing through Earth.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any breaking changes in the test suite that might be affected by the uniswap_v3_math update

# Look for test files that import uniswap_v3_math
rg -l "use uniswap_v3_math" "tests/"

# Check for any potential breaking changes in test files
rg "uniswap_v3_math::" "tests/"

Length of output: 160


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's apply my superior intellect to search the entire repository
# First, let's find where this dependency is actually used
rg -l "uniswap_v3_math"

# Then, let's examine the actual usage patterns
rg "uniswap_v3_math::" -A 2

# And for completeness, let's check for any use statements
rg "use uniswap_v3_math"

# Let's also check the git history for this dependency
git log -p Cargo.toml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "uniswap_v3_math"

Length of output: 2392

src/entities/pool.rs (1)

272-274: Bazinga! Excellent improvement in error handling!

The replacement of assertions with proper error handling using Result is theoretically sound and practically superior. As I always say, "In science, we need to be precise," and this change precisely follows Rust's error handling paradigm.

src/entities/pool.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant