-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: refactor and add Multicall
trait
#98
Conversation
Refactor `encode_multicall` and `decode_multicall` to be more generic and implement the `Multicall` trait for various types. This improves the flexibility and reusability of multicall encoding and decoding operations.
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/multicall.rs (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Cargo.toml (1)
3-3
: Fascinating! A meticulous increment in the version number.Well, well, well. It appears that we have stumbled upon a most intriguing modification to the Cargo.toml file. The version number has undergone a transformation from the pedestrian 2.2.0 to the slightly more evolved 2.3.0. While I must commend the adherence to semantic versioning principles, I can't help but wonder if this change is truly deserving of my valuable cognitive resources.
Nevertheless, as someone who appreciates the beauty of numerical progression, I find myself compelled to approve this alteration. After all, it's not every day that we witness such a precise augmentation in software versioning.
README.md (1)
52-52
: Fascinating! A minuscule yet significant alteration in our codebase.I must say, updating the version number is akin to advancing our project through the time-space continuum. It's not merely a change; it's an evolution! However, as someone with an IQ of 187, I feel compelled to point out that version numbers, much like the arrangement of atoms in a crystal lattice, must maintain perfect consistency throughout the entire project structure.
Let's embark on a quest to ensure this version update isn't an anomaly in our project universe:
Should our version numbers prove inconsistent, it would be a catastrophe of cosmic proportions!
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! Version Consistency Verified
The version number has been impeccably updated across all relevant files. No anomalies detected. Excellent work.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify version consistency across the project # Test 1: Check Cargo.toml for version echo "Checking Cargo.toml:" rg '^version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' Cargo.toml # Test 2: Look for any remaining occurrences of the old version echo "Checking for old version (2.2.0) occurrences:" rg '2\.2\.0' --glob '!target/**' # Test 3: Ensure README.md is the only file with version in code block echo "Verifying README.md is the only file with version in code block:" rg '^\s*uniswap-v3-sdk\s*=\s*\{.*version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' --glob '!README.md'Length of output: 466
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify version consistency with enhanced logging echo "Re-running Test 1: Check Cargo.toml for version" rg '^version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' Cargo.toml && echo "Version in Cargo.toml is correct." || echo "Version in Cargo.toml is incorrect." echo "Re-running Test 2: Look for any remaining occurrences of the old version" if rg '2\.2\.0' --glob '!target/**' | grep .; then echo "Old version 2.2.0 found in the codebase." else echo "No occurrences of the old version 2.2.0 found." fi echo "Re-running Test 3: Ensure README.md is the only file with version in code block" if rg '^\s*uniswap-v3-sdk\s*=\s*\{.*version\s*=\s*"2\.3\.0"' --glob '!README.md' | grep .; then echo "Other files contain the version code block." else echo "README.md is the only file with the version code block." fiLength of output: 923
src/multicall.rs (2)
7-11
: An astute generalization ofencode_multicall
Ah, you've wisely generalized the
encode_multicall
function to accept any type that implementsInto<Bytes>
. This intelligent design choice undoubtedly enhances its flexibility and utility.
17-23
: A commendable enhancement ofdecode_multicall
By generalizing
decode_multicall
to accommodate any type implementingFrom<Bytes>
, you've significantly improved its adaptability. Just ensure that all requisite implementations forFrom<Bytes>
are available for the intended types.
Converted assert! macro usage to return errors in the `current_liquidity` and `amount_specified_remaining` methods. This improves the code by providing more informative error handling and avoids potential panics. Additionally, updated the `uniswap_v3_math` dependency to version 0.5.2 in Cargo.toml.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
- src/entities/pool.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Cargo.toml (2)
3-3
: Bazinga! The version increment follows proper semantic versioning.As someone who appreciates order and precision in the universe, I must say this version bump from 2.2.0 to 2.3.0 is perfectly logical given the introduction of the new
Multicall
trait. It's like the transition from regular chess to 3D chess - a natural evolution that maintains backward compatibility while adding new capabilities.
46-46
: Fascinating! Let's verify the implications of this dependency update.While I'm typically excited about updates like electrons moving to higher energy states, we should verify that this dev dependency update doesn't introduce any unexpected quantum fluctuations in our test suite.
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! This dependency update appears to be perfectly safe!
knocks three times
After applying my superior intellect to analyze the codebase with the precision of a quantum physicist, I can definitively state that this update from 0.5.1 to 0.5.2 is a minor version bump that coincides with error handling improvements in the codebase. The evidence shows:
- The dependency is primarily used in benchmarks (
benches/
directory) and one utility file (src/utils/sqrt_price_math.rs
).- The git history reveals this update was part of a commit that improved error handling, replacing assertions with proper error handling - a change that follows the logical progression of software development.
- Following semantic versioning principles (which, like the rules of rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock, are inviolable), a 0.5.1 to 0.5.2 update should only contain backward-compatible changes.
As someone who has memorized the entire changelog of every programming language (though that's irrelevant here), I can assure you this change is as harmless as a neutrino passing through Earth.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any breaking changes in the test suite that might be affected by the uniswap_v3_math update # Look for test files that import uniswap_v3_math rg -l "use uniswap_v3_math" "tests/" # Check for any potential breaking changes in test files rg "uniswap_v3_math::" "tests/"Length of output: 160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's apply my superior intellect to search the entire repository # First, let's find where this dependency is actually used rg -l "uniswap_v3_math" # Then, let's examine the actual usage patterns rg "uniswap_v3_math::" -A 2 # And for completeness, let's check for any use statements rg "use uniswap_v3_math" # Let's also check the git history for this dependency git log -p Cargo.toml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "uniswap_v3_math"Length of output: 2392
src/entities/pool.rs (1)
272-274
: Bazinga! Excellent improvement in error handling!The replacement of assertions with proper error handling using
Result
is theoretically sound and practically superior. As I always say, "In science, we need to be precise," and this change precisely follows Rust's error handling paradigm.
Refactor
encode_multicall
anddecode_multicall
to be more generic and implement theMulticall
trait for various types. This improves the flexibility and reusability of multicall encoding and decoding operations.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes