-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf: refactor Trade
methods
#102
Conversation
Refactored `input_amount` and `output_amount` methods to use `Fraction` for cleaner and more efficient code. Improved heuristic algorithm in functions handling pool exclusions during trade computations. Added `#[repr(u32)]` and `#[allow(non_camel_case_types)]` attributes to `FeeAmount` enum and updated crate version to `2.4.1`.
Warning Rate limit exceeded@shuhuiluo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/constants.rs (2)
Line range hint
17-25
: Bazinga! The enum variants follow a perfectly logical progression.The fee amounts are arranged in ascending order, which satisfies my need for organizational perfection. However, I must point out that the naming scheme, while consistent, creates a peculiar situation where we have both
LOW
andLOW_200
,LOW_300
, etc. This reminds me of the time I had to reorganize my sock drawer to accommodate both regular and special edition Flash socks.Consider adding documentation to clarify the relationship between these variants, perhaps something like:
pub enum FeeAmount { + /// Lowest fee tier: 0.01% LOWEST = 100, + /// Low fee tier variant: 0.02% LOW_200 = 200, // ... (similar for other variants) }
Line range hint
45-83
: The conversion implementations are as robust as my weekly routine!The panic messages for invalid inputs are appropriately defensive, though they could benefit from more specific error messages. Just as I always say, "In a world of entropy, clarity in error messages is our only defense against chaos."
Consider enhancing the panic messages:
- _ => panic!("Invalid fee amount"), + _ => panic!("Invalid fee amount. Expected one of: 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 3000, 10000"),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Cargo.toml
(2 hunks)src/constants.rs
(1 hunks)src/entities/trade.rs
(8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Cargo.toml (3)
3-3
: Bazinga! The version increment follows proper semantic versioning.
As someone who appreciates order in the universe, I must say I'm pleased to see the version number incremented from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1, following the established principles of semantic versioning. This indicates non-breaking changes, which is consistent with the nature of the modifications.
37-37
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fascinating reorganization of the extensions feature list!
The reordering of dependencies in alphabetical order is quite satisfying to my need for systematic organization. However, I can't help but notice that "uniswap-lens" at the end disrupts this perfect alphabetical sequence.
Consider this more logical arrangement:
-extensions = ["alloy", "anyhow", "base64", "regex", "serde_json", "uniswap-lens"]
+extensions = ["alloy", "anyhow", "base64", "regex", "serde_json", "uniswap-lens"] # Note: Consider maintaining alphabetical order
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
37-38
: Theoretical verification of feature dependencies required!
As someone who believes in thorough verification (much like my habit of knocking three times), we should ensure these feature modifications don't introduce any circular dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! No circular dependencies detected!
After applying my superior intellect to analyze the feature dependency structure (much like I analyze my weekly routine), I can conclusively state that the feature modifications are theoretically sound. Here's why:
- The
extensions
feature properly gates all uniswap-lens imports and usages - The
std
feature follows the canonical Rust pattern of enabling std features for dependencies with optional?
notation - The error handling gracefully degrades when
std
is disabled, maintaining a proper no_std compatibility
The dependency graph is as organized as my sock drawer - each feature knows its place and purpose. The optional features are properly contained within cfg guards, and there's no circular reference that could cause a temporal paradox in our dependency tree.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential circular dependencies in features
# Search for any feature references in the codebase
echo "Checking feature usage patterns..."
rg --type rust '#\[cfg\(feature = "(extensions|std)"\)\]' -A 3
# Look for potential feature conflicts
echo "Analyzing potential feature conflicts..."
rg 'uniswap-lens' --type rust
Length of output: 2045
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# As a meticulous scientist, I must examine the feature dependencies more thoroughly
# Let's examine the Cargo.toml for all feature definitions
echo "Analyzing feature definitions in Cargo.toml..."
rg '\[features\]' -A 10 Cargo.toml
# Check for any conditional compilation blocks related to uniswap-lens
echo "Examining uniswap-lens usage patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'cfg(feature = "std")'
# Investigate potential feature interactions
echo "Investigating feature interactions..."
rg --type rust 'cfg_attr.*feature.*std' -A 2
# Check for any direct uniswap-lens imports
echo "Checking uniswap-lens imports..."
rg --type rust '^use.*uniswap_lens'
Length of output: 4222
src/constants.rs (1)
Line range hint 27-43
: The tick spacing implementation demonstrates remarkable elegance!
The use of I24::from_limbs
is as precise as my mother's method for measuring Vicks VapoRub – exactly what we need for financial calculations. The match expression is exhaustive and well-organized, much like my weekly schedule.
src/entities/trade.rs (2)
242-251
: Enhanced Precision in Input Amount Calculation
Well, it's delightful to see that you've finally recognized the superiority of using fractions for summing input amounts. This change improves numerical accuracy and elevates the integrity of the code.
274-283
: Consistent Use of Fractions for Output Amount Calculation
Ah, consistency! Utilizing fractions for output amounts ensures that our calculations maintain their precision. An intellectually sound decision that reinforces the correctness of the code.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Updated loops in trade.rs to use `enumerate()` for better clarity. Changed pool exclusion to utilize `take` and `skip` for more concise and readable code. These adjustments improve code readability and maintainability.
Refactored
input_amount
andoutput_amount
methods to useFraction
for cleaner and more efficient code. Improved heuristic algorithm in functions handling pool exclusions during trade computations. Added#[repr(u32)]
and#[allow(non_camel_case_types)]
attributes toFeeAmount
enum and updated crate version to2.4.1
.Summary by CodeRabbit
FeeAmount
enum for better representation.Trade
struct to improve calculation accuracy and control flow.