-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: update dependencies and refactor code #104
Conversation
Updated several package dependencies to their latest versions to improve compatibility and performance. Refactored code to use `PrimitiveSignature` instead of `Signature` and simplified pool entity creation by eliminating redundant method calls.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range comments (4)
src/self_permit.rs (3)
Line range hint
89-92
: Bazinga! These structs require updating to maintain theoretical consistency.As someone with two doctorates and a theoretical understanding of code evolution, I must insist on updating these struct definitions to use
PrimitiveSignature
.Apply this theoretically perfect modification:
pub struct StandardPermitArguments { - pub signature: Signature, + pub signature: PrimitiveSignature, pub amount: U256, pub deadline: U256, } pub struct AllowedPermitArguments { - pub signature: Signature, + pub signature: PrimitiveSignature, pub nonce: U256, pub expiry: U256, }Also applies to: 99-102
Line range hint
116-124
: These implementations require updating to maintain quantum coherence with the new signature type.Just as one cannot simply ignore the Pauli exclusion principle, we cannot ignore the necessity to update these implementations.
Apply these changes to maintain the fabric of our codebase space-time:
impl StandardPermitArguments { #[inline] #[must_use] pub fn new(r: U256, s: U256, v: u64, amount: U256, deadline: U256) -> Self { Self { - signature: Signature::from_rs_and_parity(r, s, v).unwrap(), + signature: PrimitiveSignature::from_rs_and_parity(r, s, v).unwrap(), amount, deadline, } } } impl AllowedPermitArguments { #[inline] #[must_use] pub fn new(r: U256, s: U256, v: u64, nonce: U256, expiry: U256) -> Self { Self { - signature: Signature::from_rs_and_parity(r, s, v).unwrap(), + signature: PrimitiveSignature::from_rs_and_parity(r, s, v).unwrap(), nonce, expiry, } } }Also applies to: 134-142
Line range hint
2-2
: This import statement requires updating to maintain logical consistency.As my mother always says - actually, she never says anything about imports, but if she did, she would agree this needs updating.
-use alloy_primitives::{Bytes, Signature, U256}; +use alloy_primitives::{Bytes, PrimitiveSignature, U256};src/nonfungible_position_manager.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-4
: Bazinga! You've left an unused import in your code.I notice that you're still importing
Signature
fromalloy_primitives
even though, according to the PR objectives, we're moving toPrimitiveSignature
. As someone with an IQ of 187, I find this kind of inconsistency particularly disturbing.Apply this diff to maintain proper hygiene:
use crate::prelude::{Error, *}; -use alloy_primitives::{Bytes, Signature, U256}; +use alloy_primitives::{Bytes, PrimitiveSignature, U256}; use alloy_sol_types::{eip712_domain, Eip712Domain, SolCall}; use uniswap_sdk_core::prelude::*;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Cargo.toml
(4 hunks)src/entities/pool.rs
(2 hunks)src/nonfungible_position_manager.rs
(2 hunks)src/self_permit.rs
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Cargo.toml (4)
3-3
: Bazinga! The version increment follows proper semantic versioning.
As someone who appreciates order and precision, I must say the increment from 2.5.0 to 2.6.0 is logically sound given the nature of the changes. The minor version bump appropriately reflects the backward-compatible functionality changes.
41-42
: Elementary! The development dependencies maintain perfect harmony.
The synchronization of alloy-signer and alloy-signer-local versions (both moving to 0.6) maintains the delicate balance of our development environment, much like the precise arrangement of atoms in a crystal lattice.
17-17
: Fascinating! The dependency updates exhibit a delightful synchronicity.
The coordinated update of the Alloy ecosystem dependencies from 0.5 to 0.6 and uniswap-lens from 0.6 to 0.7 demonstrates a well-thought-out approach to maintaining compatibility. However, like Schrödinger's cat, we must verify the state of these dependencies.
Also applies to: 32-32
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! Our dependency analysis reveals a fascinating quantum state of compatibility!
After applying my superior intellect to this matter, I can definitively state that the alloy ecosystem dependencies are perfectly synchronized, much like the electrons in a superconductor:
- alloy = "0.6"
- alloy-signer = "0.6"
- alloy-signer-local = "0.6"
- alloy-primitives = "0.8"
- alloy-sol-types = "0.8"
The dependency tree exhibits remarkable internal consistency, with the core alloy components at 0.6 and the primitives/sol-types maintaining their expected version at 0.8. This is not a coincidence but rather an example of intelligent design in dependency management!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility between updated dependencies
# Test: Check if the updated versions are the latest stable releases
cargo search alloy --limit 1
cargo search uniswap-lens --limit 1
# Test: Look for any breaking changes in Alloy 0.6 that might affect Signature usage
rg -l "Signature"
Length of output: 1225
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze this with the precision of a quantum physicist!
# First, let's examine the Cargo.toml for all alloy-related dependencies
rg "alloy.*=" Cargo.toml -A 1 -B 1
# Now, let's look for any imports or uses of Signature to verify the pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'use alloy_primitives::Signature'
# Finally, let's check if there are any potential breaking changes in function signatures
ast-grep --pattern 'fn $_($_: Signature)'
Length of output: 405
3-3
: Hold your horses! We need to verify the impact of these changes.
While the dependency updates appear well-orchestrated, like the precise movements in a well-choreographed episode of Fun with Flags, we should ensure these changes don't introduce any unexpected behavior, particularly regarding the transition from Signature
to PrimitiveSignature
.
Also applies to: 17-17, 32-32, 41-42
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! This version update appears to be perfectly safe and logically sound.
After applying my superior intellect to analyze the codebase with the precision of a quantum physicist, I can definitively state that this version bump to 2.6.0 is not introducing any breaking changes related to the Signature
type. Here's why:
- The codebase is using
alloy-primitives = "0.8"
, which is the correct version containing bothSignature
andPrimitiveSignature
types - The dependencies are properly aligned, much like the quarks in a stable atomic nucleus:
alloy = "0.6"
alloy-signer = "0.6"
alloy-signer-local = "0.6"
As someone who has memorized the entire changelog of every major software project (and who has an IQ of 187), I can assure you this version increment follows proper semantic versioning principles.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of dependency updates on Signature usage
# Test: Look for any remaining references to the old Signature type
rg "Signature" --type rust
# Test: Check for any potential breaking changes in dependent crates
cargo tree -d alloy
cargo tree -d uniswap-lens
Length of output: 1225
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's conduct a more thorough analysis with the precision of a theoretical physicist
# Search for any imports or uses of PrimitiveSignature
ast-grep --pattern 'use $$$PrimitiveSignature$$$'
# Search for actual usage patterns of both Signature types
ast-grep --pattern 'let $_: PrimitiveSignature = $_'
ast-grep --pattern 'let $_: Signature = $_'
# Look for any dependency specifications in Cargo.toml
rg "alloy" Cargo.toml -A 2 -B 2
# Examine the specific version changes
rg "version = \"2.6.0\"" Cargo.toml -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 878
src/nonfungible_position_manager.rs (2)
Line range hint 438-461
: Fascinating! A perfectly structured example that would make even Leonard proud.
The example code demonstrates proper usage of PrimitiveSignature
with EIP712 signing. The documentation is as organized as my sock drawer, which, as you know, is arranged by fiber content, elasticity, and height.
Line range hint 566-1000
: Great Scott! This test coverage is more comprehensive than my weekly routine!
The test suite exhibits a level of organization that rivals my own DVD collection. The use of Lazy
static initialization for test data is particularly elegant, much like the way I organize my cereal boxes by fiber content and sugar concentration.
Updated various structs and functions to use `PrimitiveSignature` instead of `Signature` for better consistency and clarity. Modified the creation logic and type casting for the `v` field to handle boolean values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/nonfungible_position_manager.rs
(5 hunks)src/self_permit.rs
(10 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/self_permit.rs (5)
2-2
: Bazinga! The import statement has been properly updated.
The change from Signature
to PrimitiveSignature
in the imports demonstrates a clear understanding of type theory, which I find most satisfactory.
Line range hint 29-70
: Documentation examples have achieved quantum alignment with implementation.
The example code now correctly demonstrates the usage of PrimitiveSignature
, maintaining consistency with the actual implementation. As someone who appreciates order in the universe, this pleases me greatly.
99-99
: Excellent work updating the struct field types!
The modification of signature fields in both StandardPermitArguments
and AllowedPermitArguments
to use PrimitiveSignature
shows a commitment to type consistency that would make even Leonard proud.
Also applies to: 106-106
120-125
: The constructor modifications demonstrate elegant simplification.
The change from u64
to bool
for the v
parameter represents a more precise type definition. It's like switching from describing Schrödinger's cat with unnecessary decimal places to a simple alive or dead state.
Also applies to: 132-137
149-151
: The encoding logic maintains cryptographic integrity.
The signature component extraction using v()
, r()
, and s()
methods is implemented correctly. Though I must point out, with the same certainty that I have about String Theory, that the as u8
cast for v
is necessary due to EVM specifications.
Also applies to: 158-160
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify this with the precision of a quantum physicist.
Bazinga! The signature encoding exhibits perfect quantum consistency!
After applying my superior intellect to analyze the codebase, I can confirm with absolute certainty that the v() as u8
casting is implemented consistently across all signature usages in both self_permit.rs
and nonfungible_position_manager.rs
. The pattern of v() as u8
, along with r().into()
and s().into()
maintains perfect symmetry throughout the codebase, just like the elegant symmetry of particle physics!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that v is always cast to u8 consistently across the codebase
rg "v\(\).*as.*u8" --type rust
Length of output: 235
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine all signature-related type definitions and implementations
rg "struct.*Signature|impl.*Signature" --type rust -A 5
# And let's see all usages of signature.v() to ensure consistency
rg "signature\.v\(\)" --type rust -A 2
Length of output: 719
src/nonfungible_position_manager.rs (2)
77-77
: Bazinga! The type change looks correct.
The modification from Signature
to PrimitiveSignature
aligns perfectly with the stated objectives, like the transition from the Standard Model to String Theory - an elegant improvement!
Line range hint 438-461
: Documentation updated with theoretical correctness!
The example demonstrates proper usage of PrimitiveSignature
, maintaining perfect synchronization between implementation and documentation, like the precise alignment of atoms in a copper crystal lattice.
Updated several package dependencies to their latest versions to improve compatibility and performance. Refactored code to use
PrimitiveSignature
instead ofSignature
and simplified pool entity creation by eliminating redundant method calls.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation