Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[pt] More verbs/nouns fixes in disambiguation.xml #11042

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

[pt] More verbs/nouns fixes in disambiguation.xml #11042

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

marcoagpinto
Copy link
Member

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto commented Nov 20, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

More tons of fixes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated Portuguese grammar rule to include "nada" alongside existing tokens for improved disambiguation of verb forms.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Clarified comments to enhance understanding of the grammar rule's application.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the disambiguation.xml file for Portuguese grammar rules in LanguageTool. It primarily involves renaming a rule from PELA_COMO_SOBRE_VERBS_RARE to PELA_COMO_SOBRE_NADA_VERBS_RARE, thereby expanding its scope to include the token "nada". The associated comments have been updated for clarity, and minor formatting adjustments have been made. No new rules were added or removed, and the overall structure of existing rules remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml Renamed rule PELA_COMO_SOBRE_VERBS_RARE to PELA_COMO_SOBRE_NADA_VERBS_RARE; updated comments and formatting.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jaumeortola: Suggested as a reviewer for the changes made in this PR.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59c44ce and a8dd376.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/disambiguation.xml (1)

3816-3823: LGTM! The rule expansion improves coverage.

The changes look good - expanding the rule to handle "nada" token makes sense and the examples in the comments verify this behavior is correct.

Let's verify there are no conflicts with other rules handling "nada":

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the search results for "nada" in the Portuguese language resources:

  1. The word "nada" appears in several contexts:
  • As part of the rule ID PELA_COMO_SOBRE_NADA_VERBS_RARE in disambiguation.xml
  • In hyphenated compounds like "bem-nada", "todo-nada", "tudo-nada", "quase-nada"
  • In multiwords.txt as "mais nada"
  • In entities/misc.ent as part of negation words and other patterns
  • In common_words.txt as a common word
  • In confusion_set_candidates.txt in various word pairs

The search results show that "nada" is properly handled across different Portuguese language resources, and the addition of "nada" to the rule PELA_COMO_SOBRE_NADA_VERBS_RARE is consistent with the existing language patterns and doesn't conflict with other rules.

The rule expansion to include "nada" is valid and well-integrated

The change improves disambiguation by preventing "nada" from being incorrectly tagged as a verb when it follows a participle/infinitive, similar to how "pela", "como", and "sobre" are handled.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other rules that may conflict with the expanded pattern

# Search for other rules handling "nada"
rg -A 5 'nada' 'languagetool-language-modules/pt/src/main/resources/org/languagetool/resource/pt/'

Length of output: 154207

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@marcoagpinto marcoagpinto merged commit cba0e37 into master Nov 20, 2024
5 checks passed
This was referenced Nov 21, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jaumeortola jaumeortola Awaiting requested review from jaumeortola

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Portuguese
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@marcoagpinto