refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in PyDeserializer.

[LinZhihao-723]

Description

This is one of the PR series trying to implement #96.
This PR fixes all clang-tidy warnings in PyDeserializer.

Validation performed

• Ensure the linting workflow passed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Updated linting configuration to include new source files for static code analysis
  • Refined error handling in PyDeserializer implementation
  • Removed unnecessary system error header from PyDeserializer

• Documentation

  • Updated NOLINT directives and associated comments for improved code analysis

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications to the linting configuration and the PyDeserializer implementation. The changes include adding PyDeserializer.cpp and PyDeserializer.hpp to the static code analysis task in the lint-tasks.yml file. In the source files, minor adjustments were made to error handling and NOLINT directives, with the removal of the <system_error> header from the header file. These changes aim to improve code quality and static analysis coverage.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/lint-tasks.yml	Added PyDeserializer.cpp and PyDeserializer.hpp to SRC_PATHS for cpp-static-check task
src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp	Updated NOLINT directives and error message generation
src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.hpp	Removed <system_error> header inclusion

Possibly related issues

• Fix clang-tidy warnings for all C++ source files #96 (Fix clang-tidy warnings): This PR contributes to the ongoing effort to resolve clang-tidy warnings by adding new files to static analysis and refining error handling.

Possibly related PRs

• refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in PyKeyValuePairLogEvent. #108: Similar modification to lint-tasks.yml for adding source files to static checks
• refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in PySerializer. #110: Expansion of static check coverage by adding more source files

Suggested reviewers

• haiqi96

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp (1)

Line range hint 252-259: Consider tracking the native query implementation TODO

The TODO comment indicates future work needed for native query implementation. This could affect the deserialized log event handling logic.

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this TODO for implementing native query functionality?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea07551 and 819b124.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• lint-tasks.yml (1 hunks)
• src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp (5 hunks)
• src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.hpp (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.hpp

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp (1)

Pattern **/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,ts,tsx}: - Prefer false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.

📓 Learnings (1)

src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp (1)

Learnt from: LinZhihao-723
PR: y-scope/clp-ffi-py#94
File: src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp:218-242
Timestamp: 2024-11-23T05:55:57.106Z
Learning: In `src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp`, the `deserialize_log_event` method in the `PyDeserializer` class ensures proper loop termination and does not risk infinite loops, even when handling incomplete or corrupted streams.

🔇 Additional comments (4)

src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/PyDeserializer.cpp (3)

75-75: LGTM: Updated NOLINT directives

The NOLINT directives have been appropriately updated to include *-avoid-non-const-global-variables for Python's C API global variables and arrays.

Also applies to: 85-86, 101-101

---

202-204: LGTM: Improved error message handling

The error message handling has been enhanced by using get_c_str_from_constexpr_string_view for safer string literal handling.

Also applies to: 237-241

---

Line range hint 127-134: LGTM: Consistent boolean expression style

The code consistently follows the guideline of using false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.

Also applies to: 141-142

lint-tasks.yml (1)

118-119: LGTM: Added PyDeserializer files to static analysis

The PyDeserializer files have been appropriately added to the clang-tidy static analysis scope, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing clang-tidy warnings.