Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prep DGMulti for non-conservative shock capturing #1479

Open
wants to merge 68 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jlchan
Copy link
Contributor

@jlchan jlchan commented May 16, 2023

Should also improve efficiency and extend non-conservative terms to curved meshes.

#1478 should be merged first to reduce the size of this PR.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 22 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c3c0986) 89.67% compared to head (aa0a995) 86.59%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/solvers/dgmulti/flux_differencing.jl 0.00% 22 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1479      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.67%   86.59%   -3.08%     
==========================================
  Files         458      458              
  Lines       36400    36374      -26     
==========================================
- Hits        32640    31496    -1144     
- Misses       3760     4878    +1118     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.59% <0.00%> (-3.08%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ranocha
Copy link
Member

ranocha commented Feb 21, 2024

Shall this be merged before the next breaking release?

@jlchan
Copy link
Contributor Author

jlchan commented Feb 21, 2024

I probably won't have time to finish this before then, so I'm happy to wait until the next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants