Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(hesai): add a ring section filter to Hesai sensors #182

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mojomex
Copy link
Collaborator

@mojomex mojomex commented Aug 13, 2024

PR Type

  • New Feature

Related Links

Description

⚠️ Depends on #173, which has to be merged first ⚠️

This PR introduces a simple and extendable framework to implement per-point filters in Nebula. The first filter, also added in this PR, is a ring section filter.

Point Filters

A point filter has one member function bool excluded(const NebulaPoint &) which is called per point, right after that point has been fully decoded (including angle correction). The point is excluded from the pointcloud as soon as any of the configured filters excludes it. Filters run sequentially and later filters are not executed if an earlier filter has exluded the point already.

The filter pipeline is configured via JSON, in a format like {"filter1": filter_params1, "filter2": filter_params2} and each filter type can only appear once.

Ring Section Filter

The filter can be configured to cut out zero or more sections of each ring, each section having a start and end angle.
The configuration looks like this: [[channel_id, start_deg, end_deg], [channel_id, start_deg, end_deg], ...]. Not all channels have to be specified, and channels can be specified multiple times. The start and end values are floating-point, so precise angles can be defined. Sections can overlap, but no optimizations are done on Nebula's side to merge overlapping regions.

Angles greater than 360deg and smaller than 0deg can be specified and will be auto-normalized by Nebula. Sections spanning over the 360/0 boundary are also handled correctly.

Performance

This is a fairly naive implementation:

  • while parsing, an array of arrays of sections is created. The index in the outer array corresponds to the channel ID, while the inner arrays are a collection of their rings' sections.
  • for each point, all sections on its ring are checked until it is excluded or all sections have been checked.

To measure performance overhead, the following runs have been performed:

  • a baseline run with the filter code completely commented out (performance is the same as without this PR)
  • runs with a filter on 1-128 channels, with 1-50 sections per channel. Each section is 1deg in size, such that there is no significant performance gain from buffering less points

All runs have been performed with the maximum possible number of points per cloud (all the filtering code, even for invalid points was commented out).
Figure_1

As can be seen in the figure, one filter per channel has no performance impact. 50 filters per channel increase the average runtime by about +160% compared to the baseline. As there will be a very small number of sections in the real world, this should not be a performance bottleneck in real-world operation.

Review Procedure

Remarks

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

PR Author should check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

  • Assign PR to reviewer

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

Reviewers should check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
  • (Optional) Unit tests have been written for new behavior
  • PR title describes the changes

Post-Review Checklist for the PR Author

PR Author should check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • All open points are addressed and tracked via issues or tickets

CI Checks

  • Build and test for PR: Required to pass before the merge.

@mojomex mojomex self-assigned this Aug 13, 2024
@mojomex mojomex changed the base branch from main to develop August 13, 2024 10:23
@mojomex mojomex requested a review from drwnz August 15, 2024 13:16
@mojomex mojomex mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
5 tasks
@mojomex mojomex force-pushed the hesai-ring-section-filter branch 2 times, most recently from 34f0336 to fe23c3c Compare August 30, 2024 08:37
@mojomex mojomex marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2024 04:52
@mojomex mojomex force-pushed the hesai-ring-section-filter branch 2 times, most recently from bf361dc to 5d20af3 Compare September 5, 2024 07:38
@mojomex mojomex changed the base branch from develop to main November 26, 2024 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant