chore(contracts-rfq): add world scan #3326
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce support for the "World Chain" within the blockchain configuration. This includes the addition of new environment variables in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3326 +/- ##
===================================================
+ Coverage 33.25951% 34.84723% +1.58772%
===================================================
Files 543 529 -14
Lines 34769 33776 -993
Branches 82 82
===================================================
+ Hits 11564 11770 +206
+ Misses 22182 20986 -1196
+ Partials 1023 1020 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Deploying sanguine-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
e28c085
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://075233b1.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://chore-fast-bridge-world-scan.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/worldchain/FastBridge.json (1)
308-327: Validate role-based access control implementation.The contract implements OpenZeppelin's AccessControl pattern with:
- Role management functions (grant, revoke, renounce)
- Role checking capabilities
- Proper event emission for role changes
Consider documenting the role hierarchy and access control matrix in the repository's documentation to help maintainers understand the permission structure.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/worldchain/.chainId (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/worldchain/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
- packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/worldchain/.chainId
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml (2)
49-49: Verify World Chain Etherscan verifier environment variables configuration.The Etherscan configuration follows the correct pattern and is properly positioned in the mainnet section.
Let's verify the environment variables are properly documented:
#!/bin/bash # Check if World Chain verifier environment variables are defined in .env.example echo "Checking for required environment variables in .env.example:" for var in WORLDCHAIN_VERIFIER_KEY WORLDCHAIN_VERIFIER_URL; do if ! rg "${var}=" .env.example; then echo "Warning: ${var} environment variable might be missing from .env.example" fi done
29-29: Verify World Chain RPC environment variable configuration.The RPC endpoint addition follows the correct pattern and is properly positioned in the mainnet section.
Let's verify the environment variable is properly documented:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if the
.env.examplefile exists in a different location within the repository.
Let's check the content of the
.env.examplefile in the contracts-rfq package to verify the environment variable configuration.
Environment variable configuration for World Chain RPC is properly documented
The
WORLDCHAIN_RPCenvironment variable is correctly defined inpackages/contracts-rfq/.env.examplewith an example valuehttps://worldchain-mainnet.g.alchemy.com/public. The configuration follows the same pattern as other mainnet chains and includes all necessary related variables (RPC, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key).🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if WORLDCHAIN_RPC is defined in .env.example if ! rg "WORLDCHAIN_RPC=" .env.example; then echo "Warning: WORLDCHAIN_RPC environment variable might be missing from .env.example" fiLength of output: 818
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find .env.example files in the repository fd -t f ".env.example$" # Also check if there's any file containing environment variable documentation rg -l "WORLDCHAIN.*RPC"Length of output: 303
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the contracts-rfq .env.example file cat packages/contracts-rfq/.env.exampleLength of output: 4173
packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example (1)
61-61: Verify the RPC endpoint configuration.The RPC endpoint uses Alchemy's public endpoint which might have rate limiting. Consider using a dedicated API key for better reliability and throughput.
packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/worldchain/FastBridge.json (4)
844-892: Comprehensive error handling implementation.The contract defines a robust set of custom errors:
- Access control errors
- Bridge operation errors
- Parameter validation errors
- Token handling errors
This approach provides gas-efficient error reporting compared to revert strings.
86-129: Review the bridge function implementation.The
bridgefunction accepts a comprehensive set of parameters through theBridgeParamsstruct:
- Chain identifiers (source and destination)
- Token addresses (source and destination)
- Amount information (origin and destination amounts)
- Gas handling flag
- Deadline for execution
The function is marked as
payable, which is appropriate for handling native token transfers.
1-7: Verify the contract deployment parameters.The contract has been deployed to World Chain with the following configuration:
- Contract Address:
0x05C62156C7C47E76223A560210EA648De5e6B53B- Owner Address:
0xbd88862fcc17de436f7bd17276c537acadda9a67- Block Number: 4598830
365-471: Review fee management functions.The contract includes comprehensive fee management:
- Protocol fee rate management
- Per-token fee accumulation
- Fee sweeping functionality with proper access control
| WORLDCHAIN_VERIFIER=etherscan | ||
| WORLDCHAIN_VERIFIER_URL=https://api.worldscan.org/api | ||
| WORLDCHAIN_VERIFIER_KEY=YourWorldScanKey |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
World Chain configuration appears to be correct with Alchemy infrastructure
Based on the codebase analysis, the World Chain configuration is legitimate but needs correction:
- The chain is properly integrated throughout the codebase using Alchemy's infrastructure (
worldchain-mainnet.g.alchemy.com) - The block explorer URL in the codebase consistently points to
worldchain-mainnet.explorer.alchemy.com - However, the verifier URL in
.env.example(worldscan.org) is inconsistent with the Alchemy infrastructure used everywhere else
Suggested corrections:
- The
WORLDCHAIN_VERIFIER_URLshould likely point to Alchemy's API endpoint instead ofworldscan.org - The verifier configuration should align with Alchemy's block explorer service since that's the infrastructure provider being used across the codebase
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the World Chain verifier service configuration.
The verifier configuration uses "worldscan.org" which seems unusual. Please verify:
- If this is the correct domain for the World Chain block explorer
- If the API endpoint is accessible and supports the Etherscan-compatible API
Let me try to gather more information about this configuration by searching for any references to the verifier or World Chain in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if this verifier URL is referenced in foundry configuration
rg -l "worldscan.org" --type toml
# Look for any documentation about World Chain
fd -t f "README.md" -X grep -l -i "world.*chain"
Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to worldscan.org
rg "worldscan.org"
# Search for any references to World Chain or similar terms
rg -i "world.*chain"
# Look for verifier configurations in the contracts-rfq package
fd . packages/contracts-rfq -t f -e json -e js -e ts -X grep -l "verifier"
# Check for environment variable usage related to verifier
rg "WORLDCHAIN_VERIFIER"
Length of output: 8220
Description
A clear and concise description of the features you're adding in this pull request.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem you're solving.
Metadata
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation