Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(components): update crypto to nanoid #4369

Merged

Conversation

leagrdv
Copy link
Contributor

@leagrdv leagrdv commented Dec 31, 2024

No description provided.

@leagrdv leagrdv requested a review from a team as a code owner December 31, 2024 10:32
@leagrdv leagrdv requested a review from alizedebray December 31, 2024 10:32
@leagrdv leagrdv linked an issue Dec 31, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 31, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: adf2f96

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Name Type
@swisspost/design-system-components Patch
@swisspost/design-system-components-angular-workspace Patch
@swisspost/design-system-components-react Patch
@swisspost/design-system-documentation Patch
@swisspost/design-system-components-angular Patch
@swisspost/design-system-nextjs-integration Patch
@swisspost/design-system-styles Patch
@swisspost/design-system-tokens Patch
@swisspost/design-system-intranet-header Patch
@swisspost/design-system-icons Patch
@swisspost/design-system-migrations Patch
@swisspost/design-system-styles-primeng Patch
@swisspost/internet-header Patch
@swisspost/design-system-intranet-header-workspace Patch
@swisspost/design-system-styles-primeng-workspace Patch
@swisspost/design-system-intranet-header-showcase Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@swisspost-bot
Copy link
Contributor

swisspost-bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Related Previews

@leagrdv leagrdv requested a review from alizedebray January 3, 2025 14:43
.changeset/lucky-grapes-wink.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 7, 2025

@leagrdv leagrdv merged commit ea5c638 into main Jan 8, 2025
10 checks passed
@leagrdv leagrdv deleted the 4209-should-we-use-nanoid-everywhere-we-need-random-ids branch January 8, 2025 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should we use nanoid everywhere we need random ids?
3 participants