SNOW-1642293 Add support for lazy index labels in reindex and fix reindex name bug

[sfc-gh-vbudati]

1. Which Jira issue is this PR addressing? Make sure that there is an accompanying issue to your PR.

   Fixes SNOW-1642293

2. Fill out the following pre-review checklist:

   • I am adding a new automated test(s) to verify correctness of my new code
     • If this test skips Local Testing mode, I'm requesting review from @snowflakedb/local-testing
   • I am adding new logging messages
   • I am adding a new telemetry message
   • I am adding new credentials
   • I am adding a new dependency
   • If this is a new feature/behavior, I'm adding the Local Testing parity changes.

3. Please describe how your code solves the related issue.

4. Added support for using lazy index labels with reindex.

>>> ser = pd.Series([1, 2, 3], index=["A", "B", "C"])
>>> idx = pd.Index(["X", "Y", "Z"])
>>> ser.reindex(idx)
X   NaN
Y   NaN
Z   NaN
dtype: float64

2. reindex has a bug - if it is performed with an index idx which has a name, it does not update the result series'/df's index name accordingly. The name remains None.

For instance,

>>> ser = pd.Series([0, 1, 2], index=list("ABC"), name="test")
>>> idx = native_pd.Index(list("CAB"), name="weewoo")
>>> snow_series.reindex(index=idx)
C    2
A    0
B    1
Name: test, dtype: int64

# Instead of:
weewoo
C      2
A      0
B      1
Name: test, dtype: int64

3. Fixed a bug where Index objects name was not set correctly during binary operations.

[sfc-gh-azhan]

Next, let's make reindex can accept lazy index as labels

[sfc-gh-nkrishna]

LGTM -- would it be possible to set the name field in the Index class as well when initialized in this PR (since you're already fixing the name bug)? To work around this: https://github.com/snowflakedb/snowpark-python/blob/main/src/snowflake/snowpark/modin/plugin/extensions/index.py#L269-L271

[sfc-gh-azhan]

I'll take a pass on the combined version.

[sfc-gh-azhan]

add a todo for fixing limit once @sfc-gh-rdurrani 's is monotonic PR is done

[sfc-gh-vbudati]

query count is still the same, so no changes required.