Adjust reporting

[johannah-pik]

This change includes:

• Small refactoring of the output file loading
• Inclusion of standalone transport input data into the extended transport reporting
• Small rewrite of the regional aggregation to incorporate GDP
• Input data analysis sheet in the transport compScen
• REMIND input data reported by edget analysis sheet

Motivation for this was the problems we had with the unit shift.
The new sheets enable us to analyze the model behavior in detail.

The next step would be to add a sheet for the analysis of inconvenience costs.
Needed variables are already reported in the transport.mif

Furthermore, it would be nice to aggregate intensive variables with their specific counterparts and not all with the energy service demand.

The changes do not affect the results:
/p/projects/edget/PRchangeLog/20241024_unitShiftUSD2017adjustCAPEX_2w20241030_FlexibleUnitShift

[jmuessel]

Thank you @johannah-pik!

What are the specific counterparts? I mainly now about specific variables in chemistry with, e.g., heat energy being extensive but specific heat energy being intensive. Let's take the example of Energy Intensity Sales (intensive), do we aggregate by Sales then?

[johannah-pik]

Very simply said: Intensive variables have a reference variable and when you want to aggregate them you need a weight :) E.g. the energy intensity of a mode for EUR is not the sum of the energy intensities of the single countries but an average. To what extent the values of the single countries are influencing the value for EUR is defined by the weight. Energy intensity is given in MJ/vehkm. That means the correct weight would be vehkm driven in the countries.
For simplicity/convenience everything was aggregated using the GDP in the past. Sometimes also because a better weight is not available (e.g. in mrtransport). Now we shifted at least to pkm/tkm driven in a country in the reporting and mrremind..

[ahagen-pik]

Thanks a lot, @johannah-pik, very helpful!

Is the change in aggregation of intensive variables already present now? Could you maybe provide a list of which are still missing?

Is there a specific reason you skipped 07 in the numbering of the sheets?

I'll look into plotting endogenous costs.

[johannah-pik]

I guess there was a start for the inconvenience cost plotting script that did not make it into the package..
Maybe it can become number 7 in the future :)