Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TASK: Add test for nodeType property unset behaviour #4620

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2023

Conversation

mhsdesign
Copy link
Member

@mhsdesign mhsdesign commented Oct 15, 2023

just to document the current state (it has been like this since neos 7 and 8 too).

In #4618 we discuss wether we like to keep it this way.

Comment on lines +408 to +424
'Neos.ContentRepository.Testing:Sub' => [
'superTypes' => ['Neos.ContentRepository.Testing:Base' => true],
'properties' => [
// Pseudo unset.
// The property will still be existent but looses its type information (falls back to string).
// Also, the property will not show up anymore in the ui as the inspector configuration is gone as well.
'foo' => []
]
]
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should discuss at some point if we like this kinda stuff

Copy link
Member

@ahaeslich ahaeslich Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have an issue where this can be discussed?

Copy link
Member Author

@mhsdesign mhsdesign Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mhsdesign mhsdesign force-pushed the task/addTestForNodeTypePropertyUnsetBehaviour branch from 904f93a to 05c8150 Compare November 10, 2023 10:08
@mhsdesign mhsdesign merged commit dcc9174 into 9.0 Nov 10, 2023
5 checks passed
@mhsdesign mhsdesign deleted the task/addTestForNodeTypePropertyUnsetBehaviour branch November 10, 2023 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants