Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR 25 from dooblem/bsync: Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments #3

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mikebentley15
Copy link
Owner

@mikebentley15 mikebentley15 commented Apr 12, 2022

Original pull request on dooblem/bsync

  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit

- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants