-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: update gemfile #413
base: staging
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ GEM | |||
jekyll-seo-tag (~> 2.1) | |||
minitest (5.22.3) | |||
mutex_m (0.2.0) | |||
nokogiri (1.15.6) | |||
nokogiri (1.16.5) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this a dep of a dep? from PR description it seems this is. a dep of github pages. have we tested if the current github pages version works with this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i have absolutely no clue. it shouldn't be as it's specified at the top level but the vulnerability was from this.
also, no. this is because i have no idea where github pages are used + the gem is removed in next_gen
._. i'll test this out remotely
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fyi @harishv7 - checked with @alexanderleegs and we're not quite sure what github pages is actually being used for.
this gemfile
is only being used for a few sites (self-hosted) and on further thinking i don't believe we use this gem at all.
i'm open to just marking the deps as not vuln on snyk - wdyt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to github pages gem tbh, but I am okay to mark this to be ignored on snyk
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same, i'm just keeping it because i'm scared that uninstalling has unintended consequences, however improbable
i'll mark it on snyuk then
Problem
nokogiri
got vulnerability viagithub-pages
. to fix, the gem has been updatedSolution
bump
nokogiri
to 1.16.5