Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update gemfile #413

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: staging
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: update gemfile #413

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

seaerchin
Copy link
Contributor

@seaerchin seaerchin commented Jun 26, 2024

Problem

nokogiri got vulnerability via github-pages. to fix, the gem has been updated

Solution

bump nokogiri to 1.16.5

@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ GEM
jekyll-seo-tag (~> 2.1)
minitest (5.22.3)
mutex_m (0.2.0)
nokogiri (1.15.6)
nokogiri (1.16.5)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this a dep of a dep? from PR description it seems this is. a dep of github pages. have we tested if the current github pages version works with this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i have absolutely no clue. it shouldn't be as it's specified at the top level but the vulnerability was from this.

also, no. this is because i have no idea where github pages are used + the gem is removed in next_gen ._. i'll test this out remotely

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fyi @harishv7 - checked with @alexanderleegs and we're not quite sure what github pages is actually being used for.

this gemfile is only being used for a few sites (self-hosted) and on further thinking i don't believe we use this gem at all.

i'm open to just marking the deps as not vuln on snyk - wdyt

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to github pages gem tbh, but I am okay to mark this to be ignored on snyk

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same, i'm just keeping it because i'm scared that uninstalling has unintended consequences, however improbable

i'll mark it on snyuk then

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants