-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Log errors deserializing request bodies #76
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,29 +1,33 @@ | ||
//! We want errors returned from failed json extractors to be formatted as json as well. | ||
|
||
use axum::extract; | ||
use axum::{http::StatusCode, response::IntoResponse}; | ||
use axum::response::IntoResponse; | ||
use ndc_client::models; | ||
|
||
pub struct JsonRejection { | ||
error: models::ErrorResponse, | ||
status: StatusCode, | ||
} | ||
pub struct JsonRejection(extract::rejection::JsonRejection); | ||
|
||
impl From<extract::rejection::JsonRejection> for JsonRejection { | ||
fn from(rejection: extract::rejection::JsonRejection) -> JsonRejection { | ||
JsonRejection { | ||
error: models::ErrorResponse { | ||
message: "Parse error".to_string(), | ||
details: serde_json::Value::String(rejection.body_text()), | ||
}, | ||
status: rejection.status(), | ||
} | ||
JsonRejection(rejection) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl IntoResponse for JsonRejection { | ||
fn into_response(self) -> axum::response::Response { | ||
let payload = serde_json::to_value(self.error).unwrap(); | ||
(self.status, extract::Json(payload)).into_response() | ||
fn into_response(self: JsonRejection) -> axum::response::Response { | ||
let JsonRejection(rejection) = self; | ||
tracing::error!( | ||
meta.signal_type = "log", | ||
event.domain = "ndc", | ||
event.name = "Unable to deserialize request body", | ||
name = "Unable to deserialize request body", | ||
body = %rejection.body_text(), | ||
error = true, | ||
); | ||
let error = models::ErrorResponse { | ||
message: "Parse error".to_string(), | ||
details: serde_json::Value::String(rejection.body_text()), | ||
}; | ||
let payload = serde_json::to_value(error).unwrap(); | ||
(rejection.status(), extract::Json(payload)).into_response() | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems a little bananas to me. Why are we using an extractor in a response?
I realize you didn't write this, but it does not seem correct.
Let's look into this separately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It turns out that this makes sense to an extent, since it appears to be Axum's way to communicate/build up IntoResponse trait implementations from smaller parts: https://docs.rs/axum/0.6.20/axum/response/trait.IntoResponse.html