Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

publish algorithmic decorator #170

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2022
Merged

publish algorithmic decorator #170

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2022

Conversation

odashi
Copy link
Collaborator

@odashi odashi commented Dec 13, 2022

Overview

Publish latexify.algorithmic.

References

Blocked by

NA

@odashi odashi added this to the v0.3 milestone Dec 13, 2022
@odashi odashi requested a review from ShigekiKarita December 13, 2022 18:33
@odashi odashi merged commit b8bd10c into main Dec 14, 2022
@odashi odashi deleted the add-frontend branch December 14, 2022 02:05
@luisarandas
Copy link

Amazing to see this going. I still see no examples on the notebook. What is the way you recommend to generate algorithmic environments? Can I access latexify.algorithmic on the current pip version somehow?

@odashi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

odashi commented Jan 12, 2023

@luisarandas It is still under development. If you want to try it out, you need to checkout this repository directly and install it manually. We will include this feature in the next release (v0.3).

@luisarandas
Copy link

Ok amazing, when is it coming out, do we you have a date? Thanks for this

@luisarandas
Copy link

Using the current state of the library I can render the algorithmic view table 👍 but some features are not working like for loops, will wait for your work on this

@ZibingZhang
Copy link
Contributor

@luisarandas any other features you're looking for besides for loops?

@odashi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

odashi commented Jan 13, 2023

I'm currently not available to develop new features due to increasing load of the main work. I'd appreciate it if @ZibingZhang and @luisarandas discuss about missing features (I can process reviewing though)

@luisarandas
Copy link

That is a great question! We can discuss this with more time. I would say for loops, whiles and just function logic for now (which might already work easily, embed functions there)

@odashi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

odashi commented Jan 13, 2023

Since this issue has been closed, it would be great if we open another issue ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants