Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated bundles with comparator errors #707

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

trancexpress
Copy link
Contributor

Changes to ecj are for handling of switch on String.

See: eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator#2595

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Test Results

  660 files  ±0    660 suites  ±0   1h 15m 49s ⏱️ - 1m 1s
2 201 tests ±0  2 154 ✅ ±0   47 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
6 747 runs  ±0  6 604 ✅ ±0  143 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit dec4e65. ± Comparison against base commit a4c710a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

Please bump versions as the build failure shows:

10:28:15  [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.eclipse.tycho.extras:tycho-p2-extras-plugin:4.0.10:compare-version-with-baselines (compare-attached-artifacts-with-release) on project org.eclipse.equinox.core.feature: Only qualifier changed for (org.eclipse.equinox.core.feature.feature.jar/1.15.300.v20241127-0801). Expected to have bigger x.y.z than what is available in baseline (1.15.300.v20241030-2121) -> [Help 1]
10:28:15  [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.eclipse.tycho.extras:tycho-p2-extras-plugin:4.0.10:compare-version-with-baselines (compare-attached-artifacts-with-release) on project org.eclipse.equinox.server.core: Only qualifier changed for (org.eclipse.equinox.server.core.feature.jar/1.16.300.v20241127-0801). Expected to have bigger x.y.z than what is available in baseline (1.16.300.v20241030-2121) -> [Help 1]

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

@HannesWell Is there a chance to make the autobump handle features too (like in this case)?

@akurtakov akurtakov merged commit b25e017 into eclipse-equinox:master Nov 27, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@HannesWell
Copy link
Member

@HannesWell Is there a chance to make the autobump handle features too (like in this case)?

The workflow handles features already.
It's just not enabled for the repository at all :/

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

How easy it is to get used to automation and take it for granted!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants