fix: fix for __array__ removal from array-api-strict
#4325
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
deepmd/dpmodel/common.py (1)
111-111: Consider adding error handling for the fallback path.The comment indicates that
np.asarraymay fail as it's not within Array API standard. Consider adding try-catch error handling with a more informative error message to help users understand why the conversion failed.- # asarray is not within Array API standard, so may fail - return np.asarray(x) + # asarray is not within Array API standard, so may fail + try: + return np.asarray(x) + except Exception as e: + raise ValueError( + f"Failed to convert array to numpy array. For non-CPU devices, " + f"the array implementation must support __array__ protocol: {str(e)}" + ) from e
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deepmd/dpmodel/common.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
deepmd/dpmodel/common.py (2)
108-111: Good solution using DLPack for array conversion.
The addition of device-specific handling using np.from_dlpack(x) is a good solution to address the removal of __array__ from array-api-strict. DLPack is a stable and standardized protocol for array interchange between different array libraries.
108-111: Verify the array-api-strict compatibility.
Let's verify that this change aligns with array-api-strict requirements and that we're handling all necessary device cases.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code inspection and search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the array-api-strict compatibility:
The code is already array-api-strict compatible and the change is correct.
The key findings that support this:
- The code uses
x.devicecheck which is part of the array API standard - The comment "asarray is not within Array API standard" is accurate - the code correctly handles this by using dlpack for CPU arrays
- The project has array-api-strict as a dependency and extensive test coverage for array-api-strict compatibility
- The code follows array API practices by using array namespace checks and array API compatible operations
The change in question:
if x.device == "cpu":
# dlpack needs the device to be the same
return np.from_dlpack(x)
# asarray is not within Array API standard, so may failThis is the correct approach because:
- It uses the standard array API device attribute
- It handles CPU arrays via dlpack which is the array API recommended way
- The comment accurately notes that asarray is not part of the standard
- The fallback is properly documented
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other array conversion patterns that might need updating
# and verify array-api-strict compatibility requirements
# Look for other array conversion patterns
echo "Checking for other array conversion patterns..."
rg -l "asarray|array|__array__" --type python
# Look for device-specific handling
echo "Checking for other device-specific array handling..."
rg -l "\.device\s*==" --type python
# Look for array-api-strict imports or references
echo "Checking for array-api-strict usage..."
rg -l "array-api|array_api" --type python
Length of output: 529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without specifying the file type since the previous attempt failed
# Look for array conversion patterns
echo "Checking for array conversion patterns..."
rg "asarray|array|__array__"
# Look for device-specific handling
echo "Checking for device-specific array handling..."
rg "\.device\s*=="
# Look for array-api imports or references
echo "Checking for array-api usage..."
rg "array_api|array-api"
# Also check imports specifically in the file under review
echo "Checking imports in the specific file..."
cat deepmd/dpmodel/common.py | grep -E "^import|^from.*import"
Length of output: 411604
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)
88-88: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about version exclusion.The dependency update correctly excludes
array-api-strictversion 2.1.1 while maintaining the minimum version requirement. This aligns with the PR objective to handle the removal of the__array__method.Consider adding an inline comment explaining why version 2.1.1 is excluded, to help future maintainers understand the rationale:
- 'array-api-strict>=2,!=2.1.1;python_version>="3.9"', + # Exclude version 2.1.1 due to __array__ method removal + 'array-api-strict>=2,!=2.1.1;python_version>="3.9"',
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
pyproject.toml(1 hunks)source/tests/common/dpmodel/array_api/test_env_mat.py(0 hunks)source/tests/consistent/descriptor/common.py(2 hunks)source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_dos.py(2 hunks)source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_ener.py(2 hunks)source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_property.py(2 hunks)source/tests/consistent/test_activation.py(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- source/tests/common/dpmodel/array_api/test_env_mat.py
- source/tests/consistent/test_activation.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- source/tests/consistent/descriptor/common.py
- source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_dos.py
- source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_ener.py
- source/tests/consistent/fitting/test_property.py
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #4325 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.50% 84.50%
=======================================
Files 570 570
Lines 53162 53169 +7
Branches 3059 3061 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 44927 44933 +6
Misses 7272 7272
- Partials 963 964 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2024
See #4325. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated dependency constraints for improved reliability. - Expanded testing commands to enhance the testing suite. - Improved setup process with additional installation commands for specific environments. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
wanghan-iapcm
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2024
This was referenced Nov 9, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See: https://github.com/data-apis/array-api-strict/blob/main/docs/changelog.md#major-changes
Summary by CodeRabbit
pyproject.tomlfor better compatibility.