Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: pin array-api-strict to <2.1.1 #4326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Nov 7, 2024

See #4325.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency constraints for improved reliability.
    • Expanded testing commands to enhance the testing suite.
    • Improved setup process with additional installation commands for specific environments.

@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm November 7, 2024 22:55
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the pyproject.toml file, focusing on dependency management and testing enhancements. The upper bound for the array-api-strict dependency has been tightened for Python 3.9 and above. Additionally, a new test command targeting LAMMPS-related tests has been added, and the setup process for Linux and macOS environments has been expanded with additional installation commands for dependencies like mpich and CUDA packages.

Changes

File Change Summary
pyproject.toml - Updated upper bound for array-api-strict to >=2,<2.1.1 for Python 3.9+.
- Added test command pytest {project}/source/tests/tf/test_lammps.py.
- Expanded before-all commands for Linux and macOS to include installation of mpich and CUDA-related packages.

Possibly related PRs

  • [r2] docs: pin sphinx-argparse to < 0.5.0 (#3988) #4133: Changes in the pyproject.toml file regarding dependency version constraints are related to the main PR's modifications in the same file, indicating a focus on managing dependencies effectively.
  • ci: pin ubuntu to 22.04 #4213: Although primarily focused on CI environment changes, this PR's adjustments to the setup process for dependencies may indirectly relate to the enhancements in the testing commands and environment setup in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • wanghan-iapcm

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)

88-89: LGTM! Consider documenting this constraint in CHANGELOG.md

The version pinning of array-api-strict to <2.1.1 is well-justified with the referenced issue. This is a good preventive measure to maintain compatibility.

Consider adding an entry to CHANGELOG.md to document this dependency constraint for future reference.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3236db5 and 5c504bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.33%. Comparing base (3236db5) to head (5c504bd).
Report is 3 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4326      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.42%   84.33%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         570      570              
  Lines       53107    53107              
  Branches     3059     3059              
==========================================
- Hits        44836    44788      -48     
- Misses       7307     7354      +47     
- Partials      964      965       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2024 01:16
@njzjz njzjz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 02:52
@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:devel with commit 6c66be9 Nov 8, 2024
60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants