-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add has_message_passing API #3851
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent changes introduce a new method Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (11)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
Additional comments not posted (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #3851 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.63% 82.67% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 515 515
Lines 49533 49609 +76
Branches 2985 2985
==========================================
+ Hits 40932 41013 +81
+ Misses 7690 7686 -4
+ Partials 911 910 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe the return value of has_message_passing
of dpa1 and dpa2 descriptor should be decided by the return value of the same method in se_atten and reformer descriptors. Then the definition of has_message_passing
of these descriptors should be added
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
deepmd/dpmodel/descriptor/repformers.py (1)
390-393
: Ensure consistency in method documentation.The method documentation could be more descriptive. Consider explaining what "message passing" means in this context to help future developers understand its use.
Fix deepmodeling#3713. Fix deepmodeling#3733. This is a breaking change. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced a new method `has_message_passing` across various descriptor classes. This method returns a boolean indicating whether the descriptor has message passing capability. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
Fix #3713. Fix #3733. This is a breaking change.
Summary by CodeRabbit
has_message_passing
across various descriptor classes. This method returns a boolean indicating whether the descriptor has message passing capability.