Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trying to debug the cd4t multi commit before merging it in the baseline #395

Open
wants to merge 335 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jbsv
Copy link
Contributor

@jbsv jbsv commented Dec 9, 2024

No description provided.

PascalinDe and others added 30 commits November 22, 2023 14:05
The new keys couldn't be created when the backend was not running.
Fixed it by calling the backend only when necessary.
fix: repair JSON export
Correctly create new keys
dragonleman and others added 23 commits May 8, 2024 09:47
Add the latest changes to the frontend API to the script.
Also removes the setup of the certificates, which is not needed for grpc.
fix: use size of Base64-encoded ID to calculate ballot length for decryption
feat: change default filter on form list to 'Open'
With this PR, the docker images are built, but only pushed when the
action is run on the 'main' branch.
Only pushing if merge on main
feat: hide elections on blocklist
fix: add '-y' flag to make sure apt builds autonomously
- change name from SuffragiaBlock to SuffragiaBatch
- add prefixed.Snapshot
- added issue to t.Skip in TestHandler_StartShuffle
- added more issues
Merge C4DT's developments into C4DT branch
@jbsv jbsv requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2024 13:58
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 9, 2024

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
3 out of 5 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ PascalinDe
✅ ineiti
✅ jbsv
❌ multiscan
❌ dragonleman
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants