Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blank UDL for the sake of agility #180 #181

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

KendallWeihe
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal to temporarily blank out the UDL for the sake of near term agility. Closes #180; copy/pasting here:

We're carrying around a lot of baggage with the current UDL file; we're in a state of actively changing the API surface in order to nail down the optimal route forward. In doing so, every time we make a breaking API change we have to update bindings, which makes PRs a nuisance to review. I propose we blank the current UDL file, so that we can move faster. We have confidence that UniFFI bindings will work, and we can reference back to the existing commit when we go to build out bindings FOR REAL.

Also I'll add that some of these UDL patterns may be subject to change; I want to bring in more team members from the ground-up to explore the different patterns and ways forward.

@KendallWeihe KendallWeihe merged commit 496a73b into main May 8, 2024
9 checks passed
@KendallWeihe KendallWeihe deleted the kendall/blank-udl-180 branch May 8, 2024 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Blank UDL bindings for the sake of agility
4 participants