Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add sphinx-docs-starter-pack base #185

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Have you signed the CLA?

This PR follows the instructions from https://github.com/canonical/sphinx-docs-starter-pack to add the baseline sphinx-docs-start-pack upon which the coming docs will be based on.

The .sphinx folder is pretty much a boilerplate and should stay in sync with https://github.com/canonical/sphinx-docs-starter-pack.

RTD has already been connected to the Chisel project.

@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro requested a review from letFunny December 16, 2024 15:53
@cjdcordeiro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note the automatically-built RTD page within the checks -> https://canonical-chisel--185.com.readthedocs.build/en/185/

rebornplusplus and others added 3 commits December 16, 2024 17:27
This commit adds a skeleton of the documentation based on docs starter
pack: https://canonical-starter-pack.readthedocs-hosted.com/latest/.

Note that the docs themselves are not updated. Only necessary files and
hacks are introduced in this commit.
Read reuse/substitutions.yaml if it exists into myst_substitutions to
reuse content with simple markdown.

Additionally, delete reuse/links.txt since we are not using
reStructuredText.

This commit also updates a few misc settings in conf.py.
@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro force-pushed the ROCKS-1684/sphinx-starter-pack branch from f9d1c51 to c603b11 Compare December 16, 2024 16:27
@cjdcordeiro cjdcordeiro mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants