Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ruff: drop use of .ruff.toml #1217

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

ruff: drop use of .ruff.toml #1217

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

bjlittle
Copy link
Owner

@bjlittle bjlittle commented Nov 20, 2024

🚀 Pull Request

Description

This pull-request drops the use of the .ruff.toml to capture temporary non-compliances.

All non-compliances have been addressed or relocated with TODO markers to the pyproject.toml.

Reference: #1211, #1212, #1214, #1215, and #1216


@github-actions github-actions bot added the type: infrastructure Auto-labelled label Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.34%. Comparing base (00a82ed) to head (5b5b650).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1217   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.34%   91.34%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines        2958     2958           
=======================================
  Hits         2702     2702           
  Misses        256      256           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@bjlittle bjlittle merged commit a431136 into main Nov 20, 2024
22 checks passed
@bjlittle bjlittle deleted the drop-ruff-toml branch November 20, 2024 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant