Add new provider for hgnc.symbol: cbgda

[nagutm]

This resource does create unique identifiers in the format CB1, CB104, etc. as seen in the image below. However, the unique identifiers for each entity are not resolvable through this format of identifiers but rather the name of the gene for cbgda.gene and the name of the disease for cbgda.disease.

[cthoyt]

We should have a discussion about if this qualifies as a semantic space or not. Combine with the fact that it's not a notable (or, from the UI design, high quality) resource, maybe we should come up with some criteria for skipping this kind of resource. This is similar to the fact that we don't import all of the Bioportal ontologies because a lot of them are junk

[cthoyt]

1. Have discussion about updating policy on criteria for notability + correctness
2. Update curation guidelines for semi-automated literature curation accordingly
3. Check if the gene namespace is just a provider for hgnc.symbol

[bgyori]

I agree with the general idea of using discretion to determine notability. We should probably come up with a curation tag in the paper curation tsv which expresses something like "relevant but not notable" (this would be a positive training sample for machine learning purposes but something that ended up not being added to the Bioregistry).

In this case, this is a resource published in Database (Oxford) with a working website so I wouldn't dismiss it apriori as not notable, and the content seems to be pretty useful. Overall, curating it simply as a provider for hgnc.symbol would be appropriate.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.49%. Comparing base (8950e70) to head (e35d8f7).
Report is 130 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1225      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.51%   43.49%   +0.97%     
==========================================
  Files         117      118       +1     
  Lines        8327     8190     -137     
  Branches     1963     1346     -617     
==========================================
+ Hits         3540     3562      +22     
+ Misses       4582     4464     -118     
+ Partials      205      164      -41     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nagutm]

I think that not_notable should work as a tag to describe these types of resources for the future. If you agree, I can move forward with updating the relevancy vocabulary in the necessary files.
@bgyori

[bgyori]

I think that not_notable should work as a tag to describe these types of resources for the future. If you agree, I can move forward with updating the relevancy vocabulary in the necessary files. @bgyori

Yes, we can define a tag like that on a separate PR and use it in the future whenever appropriate.