Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open-search with quantms, use cases and workflow #345

Open
8 tasks
ypriverol opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
8 tasks

Open-search with quantms, use cases and workflow #345

ypriverol opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request high-priority open-search sage-support

Comments

@ypriverol
Copy link
Member

ypriverol commented Jan 18, 2024

Description of feature

@daichengxin #contributors

With the support of SAGE by quantms, we have opened the possibility to support a quantms open-search workflow. I recommend the following steps:

  • Implement an identification workflow based on SAGE enabling open-search analyses. I think we don't have to implement the quantification part in the first iteration because mainly research in open-search analyses are id-based.

  • Implement a Python tool that enables to analyse the delta masses and identified the potential modifications for each delta mass. The use cases for this tool are:

    • Glycoproteomics
    • Additional post-translational modifications for proteogenomics validation. Given an MGF or mzML files find with open-search all the spectrum that could be identified which will be potential FP Identifications in variants.
  • Use Percolator to boost the number of IDs based on open-search results.

  • We may need to support other files such as MGF files because in proteogenomics you may have a single file with the spectra for all novel peptides.
    This is the first issue about this topic, and It will be good to see before starting coding the following challenges:

  • See if other tools and packages can be used to perform the identification of the Mods on delta masses, which means we don't need to implement the Python tool.

  • See if SAGE team @lazear if not working on a similar tool, coordinate with him this development.

Please feel free to give us feedback @timosachsenberg @jpfeuffer @fabianegli @WangHong007

@ypriverol ypriverol added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request high-priority open-search sage-support labels Jan 18, 2024
@lazear
Copy link

lazear commented Jan 19, 2024

One option is to shim Sage outputs into a format that PTM-shepherd use:s https://github.com/Nesvilab/PTM-Shepherd

I submitted a grant to the CZI open source program for Sage, and one of the aims is to develop/integrate some open search refinement tools, so let's hope it gets funded!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request high-priority open-search sage-support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants