chore: rename cross chain to crosschain #750
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes extensive renaming and restructuring of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
solidity/contracts/bridge/ICrosschain.sol (1)
Line range hint
11-18: Consider updating deprecated function and event names for consistency.While the interface has been renamed to
ICrosschain, there are still elements using the old naming convention:
- The deprecated
crossChainfunction (lines 11-18)- The
CrossChainevent (lines 39-48)For consistency, you might want to update these to
crosschainandCrosschainrespectively. However, if these are kept for backwards compatibility reasons, please add a comment explaining why the old naming is retained.Also applies to: 39-48
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go (1)
Line range hint
24-50: Consider refactoring for improved readability and maintainability.While the function logic remains unchanged and appears to be correct, its complexity and the handling of multiple scenarios make it a candidate for refactoring. Consider breaking down the function into smaller, more focused helper functions to improve readability and maintainability.
Here's a suggested refactoring approach:
- Extract the native coin handling logic into a separate function.
- Extract the native ERC20 token handling logic into another function.
- Create a main function that determines the token type and calls the appropriate helper function.
This refactoring could look something like this:
func (c *Keeper) EvmTokenToBaseCoin(ctx sdk.Context, evm *vm.EVM, crosschainKeeper CrosschainKeeper, holder, tokenAddr common.Address, amount *big.Int) (sdk.Coin, error) { erc20Token, err := crosschainKeeper.GetBaseDenomByErc20(ctx, tokenAddr) if err != nil { return sdk.Coin{}, err } baseCoin := sdk.NewCoin(erc20Token.Denom, sdkmath.NewIntFromBigInt(amount)) if erc20Token.IsNativeCoin() { return c.handleNativeCoin(ctx, evm, holder, tokenAddr, baseCoin, amount) } else if erc20Token.IsNativeERC20() { return c.handleNativeERC20(ctx, evm, holder, tokenAddr, baseCoin, amount) } else { return sdk.Coin{}, fmt.Errorf("invalid erc20 token owner: %s", tokenAddr) } } func (c *Keeper) handleNativeCoin(ctx sdk.Context, evm *vm.EVM, holder, tokenAddr common.Address, baseCoin sdk.Coin, amount *big.Int) (sdk.Coin, error) { // ... implementation for native coin handling } func (c *Keeper) handleNativeERC20(ctx sdk.Context, evm *vm.EVM, holder, tokenAddr common.Address, baseCoin sdk.Coin, amount *big.Int) (sdk.Coin, error) { // ... implementation for native ERC20 token handling }This refactoring would make the main function more concise and easier to understand at a glance, while moving the detailed logic into separate, focused functions.
x/crosschain/types/external_address.go (4)
69-69: LGTM: Consistent terminology update, but consider error handlingThe change from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in the error message is consistent with the PR objective and improves the overall consistency of terminology in the codebase.
Consider changing the panic to an error return for better error handling. This would make the function signature consistent with
ValidateExternalAddrand allow callers to handle the error gracefully. For example:func ExternalAddrToAccAddr(chainName, addr string) (sdk.AccAddress, error) { router, ok := externalAddressRouter[chainName] if !ok { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", chainName) } return router.ExternalAddrToAccAddr(addr), nil }
77-77: LGTM: Consistent terminology update, but consider error handlingThe change from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in the error message is consistent with the PR objective and improves the overall consistency of terminology in the codebase.
Similar to the previous function, consider changing the panic to an error return for better error handling. This would allow callers to handle the error gracefully. For example:
func ExternalAddrToHexAddr(chainName, addr string) (common.Address, error) { router, ok := externalAddressRouter[chainName] if !ok { return common.Address{}, fmt.Errorf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", chainName) } return router.ExternalAddrToHexAddr(addr), nil }
85-85: LGTM: Consistent terminology update, but consider error handlingThe change from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in the error message is consistent with the PR objective and improves the overall consistency of terminology in the codebase.
As with the previous functions, consider changing the panic to an error return for better error handling. This would allow callers to handle the error gracefully. For example:
func ExternalAddrToStr(chainName string, bz []byte) (string, error) { router, ok := externalAddressRouter[chainName] if !ok { return "", fmt.Errorf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", chainName) } return router.ExternalAddrToStr(bz), nil }
61-85: Summary: Consistent terminology updates and suggestion for future improvementThe changes in this file successfully update the error messages to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain", aligning with the PR objective and improving consistency throughout the codebase.
For future improvements, consider standardizing the error handling approach across all functions in this file. Currently,
ValidateExternalAddrreturns an error, while the other three functions (ExternalAddrToAccAddr,ExternalAddrToHexAddr, andExternalAddrToStr) panic on unrecognized chain names. Adopting a consistent error-returning approach could improve the overall robustness and maintainability of the code.This change would involve:
- Updating the function signatures to return errors.
- Replacing panics with error returns.
- Updating the calling code to handle these errors appropriately.
While this is out of scope for the current PR, it could be a valuable improvement for a future refactoring task.
x/crosschain/types/legacy.go (1)
62-62: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for clarity.The change from "unrecognized cross chain name" to "unrecognized crosschain name" is consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This improves naming consistency throughout the codebase.
For even better clarity, consider capitalizing "crosschain" in the error message:
- return sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrap("unrecognized crosschain name") + return sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrap("unrecognized Crosschain name")This would make it clear that "Crosschain" is a proper noun in this context, potentially improving readability for developers unfamiliar with the term.
x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.go (3)
20-20: LGTM. Consider future removal of deprecated struct.The renaming from
CrossChainMethodtoCrosschainMethodis consistent with the PR objective. However, given the deprecation comment, it might be worth considering a follow-up task to remove this struct entirely and replace its usages withBridgeCallMethod.
27-32: LGTM. Consider future removal of deprecated constructor.The renaming from
NewCrossChainMethodtoNewCrosschainMethodis consistent with the PR objective and the struct renaming. However, given the deprecation comment, it might be worth considering a follow-up task to remove this constructor entirely and update its usages to useBridgeCallMethod.
Line range hint
1-137: Overall LGTM. Consider future cleanup of deprecated elements.The changes in this file consistently rename "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" across struct names, method names, and argument types. These changes align well with the PR objective and maintain the existing functionality.
For future improvements:
- Consider removing the deprecated
CrosschainMethodstruct and its associated methods, replacing them withBridgeCallMethod.- Ensure that all usages of the renamed elements are updated throughout the codebase.
- Update any documentation or comments that might still reference the old "CrossChain" terminology.
x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
Line range hint
140-159: LGTM! Consider using a map for module-specific params.The renaming of
CrossChainParams()toCrosschainParams()is consistent with the PR objective. The functionality remains unchanged.As a minor suggestion for improved readability and maintainability:
Consider refactoring the switch statement to use a map of module names to their respective default params. This could make it easier to add new modules in the future. For example:
var moduleParams = map[string]types.Params{ ethtypes.ModuleName: ethtypes.DefaultGenesisState().Params, bsctypes.ModuleName: bsctypes.DefaultGenesisState().Params, // ... other modules ... } func (s *KeeperMockSuite) CrosschainParams() types.Params { if params, ok := moduleParams[s.moduleName]; ok { return params } panic("module not supported") }This approach could simplify adding new modules and reduce the risk of forgetting to update this method when adding new modules.
x/crosschain/keeper/bridge_call_out.go (1)
Line range hint
279-305: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling.The renaming of
CrossChainBaseCointoCrosschainBaseCoinis consistent with the PR objective of standardizing "crosschain" terminology. The function logic remains unchanged and appears correct.Consider wrapping the errors returned from
k.IBCTransferandk.BuildOutgoingTxBatchwith additional context to improve debugging:if fxTarget.IsIBC() { sequence, err := k.IBCTransfer(ctx, from.Bytes(), receipt, amount, fxTarget.IBCChannel, memo) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to perform IBC transfer: %w", err) } // ... rest of the code } else { batchNonce, err := k.BuildOutgoingTxBatch(ctx, from, receipt, amount, fee) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to build outgoing tx batch: %w", err) } // ... rest of the code }This will provide more context when errors occur, making it easier to identify the source of the problem.
x/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
Line range hint
307-349: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage for CheckContractAddressIsDisabledThe new
TestCheckContractAddressIsDisabledfunction provides excellent coverage for theCheckContractAddressIsDisabledfunctionality. It includes various scenarios such as empty disabled list, disabled address, disabled method, and non-disabled cases. The test structure is clear, and the use ofrequirefor assertions is appropriate.One minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a test case for an invalid hex address or method ID to ensure the function handles malformed input correctly. This could help catch potential issues with input validation.
Example:
{ name: "Invalid hex address", disabledPrecompiles: []string{"invalid_hex_address"}, addr: addr, methodId: methodId, expectedError: "invalid hex address", },tests/contract/CrossChainTest.go (2)
Line range hint
208-233: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CROSSCHAINADDRESS method, with a suggestionThe
CROSSCHAINADDRESSmethod has been correctly updated forCrosschainTestCaller,CrosschainTestSession, andCrosschainTestCallerSession. The changes are consistent with the new naming convention and preserve the original functionality.However, consider renaming the method to
CrosschainAddressto better align with Go naming conventions, which typically use CamelCase for exported names.// Suggestion: Rename the method func (_CrosschainTest *CrosschainTestCaller) CrosschainAddress(opts *bind.CallOpts) (common.Address, error) { // ... (rest of the implementation remains the same) }
270-285: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CrossChain method, with a suggestion for further consistencyThe
CrossChainmethod has been correctly updated forCrosschainTestTransactor,CrosschainTestSession, andCrosschainTestTransactorSession. These changes are consistent with the new naming convention and preserve the original functionality of the method.However, for complete consistency with the renaming effort, consider changing the method name from
CrossChaintoCrosschain.// Suggestion: Rename the method for consistency func (_CrosschainTest *CrosschainTestTransactor) Crosschain(opts *bind.TransactOpts, _token common.Address, _receipt string, _amount *big.Int, _fee *big.Int, _target [32]byte, _memo string) (*types.Transaction, error) { // ... (rest of the implementation remains the same) }app/keepers/keepers.go (1)
Line range hint
91-103: Update method receiver to match the new struct nameThe struct has been renamed from
CrossChainKeeperstoCrosschainKeepers, but theToSlice()method still uses the old name. Please update the method receiver to match the new struct name.Apply this change:
-func (c CrossChainKeepers) ToSlice() []crosschainkeeper.Keeper { +func (c CrosschainKeepers) ToSlice() []crosschainkeeper.Keeper {x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (1)
Line range hint
1-674: Summary: Consistent renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" throughout the file.The changes in this file are part of a larger effort to standardize the naming convention from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". The modifications include:
- Renaming the
CrossChainMsginterface toCrosschainMsg.- Updating type assertions to use the new interface name.
- Consistently updating error messages in all
ValidateBasicmethods to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain".These changes improve consistency throughout the codebase without altering any functionality. The renaming has been applied thoroughly and consistently across all relevant parts of the file.
To further improve the codebase:
- Consider updating any related documentation or comments to reflect the new naming convention.
- Ensure that any external references to these types (in other parts of the codebase or in client code) are also updated to maintain consistency.
- If there are any configuration files or environment variables using the old naming, they should be updated as well.
contract/ICrossChain.go (1)
32-39: Update the file name in the commentThe comment at the top of the file still refers to
ICrossChain.go, but the file has been renamed. Update the comment to reflect the new file name.- // This file is a generated binding and any manual changes will be lost. + // This file is a generated binding and any manual changes will be lost. + // Source: contract/ICrosschain.go
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (8 hunks)
- contract/ICrossChain.go (30 hunks)
- contract/compile.sh (1 hunks)
- contract/contract.go (1 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol (2 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/ICrosschain.sol (1 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/test/CrosschainTest.sol (4 hunks)
- tests/contract/CrossChainTest.go (4 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/bridge_call_out.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_router.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/many_to_one.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/msg_server_router.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/contract.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/contract_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.go (3 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/has_oracle_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/is_oracle_online_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/contract.go (3 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/external_address.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/legacy.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (20 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/msgs_test.go (20 hunks)
- x/erc20/types/token.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/middleware/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/middleware/keeper/relay.go (3 hunks)
- x/ibc/middleware/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_router.go
- x/crosschain/keeper/msg_server_router.go
- x/erc20/types/token.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (87)
x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain_test.go (3)
14-17: LGTM! Consistent variable usage and unchanged test logic.The renamed variable
crosschainis used consistently throughout the function. The test logic and assertions remain unchanged, maintaining the same checks for the lengths ofInputsandOutputsfor both the method and event.
12-12: LGTM! VerifyNewCrosschainMethodimplementation.The variable name change from
crossChaintocrosschainis consistent with the PR objective and follows Go naming conventions.Please run the following script to check the implementation of
NewCrosschainMethod:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of NewCrosschainMethod # Test: Search for the NewCrosschainMethod function definition. Expect: Function definition with updated naming. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewCrosschainMethod($_) $_'
11-11: LGTM! Verify impact on test runners.The function name change from
TestCrossChainABItoTestCrosschainABIis consistent with the PR objective and follows Go naming conventions.Please run the following script to ensure no other files are referencing the old function name:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No references to
TestCrossChainABIfound.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old function name # Test: Search for the old function name. Expect: No results. rg --type go 'TestCrossChainABI'Length of output: 577
x/ibc/middleware/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
18-18: LGTM! Verify implementations and callers.The addition of an error return to
AfterIBCAckSuccessimproves error handling. This is a positive change that allows for more robust error management.Please run the following script to ensure all implementations and callers of this method have been updated:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all implementations and callers of AfterIBCAckSuccess have been updated # Test: Find all implementations of CrosschainKeeper ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type $_ struct { $$$ } func ($$_) AfterIBCAckSuccess(ctx sdk.Context, sourceChannel string, sequence uint64) $ret { $$$ }' # Test: Find all callers of AfterIBCAckSuccess rg --type go 'AfterIBCAckSuccess\s*\('
15-15: LGTM! Verify impact on dependent code.The renaming of
CrossChainKeepertoCrosschainKeeperaligns with the PR objective and improves naming consistency.Please run the following script to ensure all references to this interface have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! All implementations of
AfterIBCAckSuccessnow return an error.The renaming of
CrossChainKeepertoCrosschainKeeperand the update to theAfterIBCAckSuccessmethod signature have been successfully verified across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all occurrences of CrossChainKeeper have been updated to CrosschainKeeper # Test: Search for any remaining instances of CrossChainKeeper rg --type go 'CrossChainKeeper' # Test: Confirm the new naming is used consistently rg --type go 'CrosschainKeeper'Length of output: 1132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all implementations of AfterIBCAckSuccess now return an error # Search for all definitions of AfterIBCAckSuccess and check if they return an error rg --type go 'func\s+\(\w+\s+\w+\)\s+AfterIBCAckSuccess\s*\(.*\)\s+error\s*\{' -B 1Length of output: 255
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all definitions of AfterIBCAckSuccess and their return types # Search for all function definitions of AfterIBCAckSuccess rg --type go 'func\s+\(\w+\s+\w+\)\s+AfterIBCAckSuccess\s*\(.*\)\s*(\w+\s+)?{' --context 1Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all definitions of AfterIBCAckSuccess and their return types # Search for all function definitions of AfterIBCAckSuccess rg --type go 'func\s+\(\w+\s+\w+\)\s+AfterIBCAckSuccess\s*\(.*\)\s*(\w+\s+)?\{' --context 1Length of output: 366
x/ibc/middleware/keeper/keeper.go (3)
18-18: LGTM! Function signature updated consistently.The
NewKeeperfunction signature has been updated to usecrosschainKeeper types.CrosschainKeeper, which is consistent with the changes in theKeeperstruct and aligns with the PR objective.
15-22: Overall assessment: Changes look good and improve consistency.The renaming of "cross chain" to "crosschain" has been consistently applied in this file. The changes improve naming conventions without altering the existing functionality. Make sure to run the verification scripts provided in the previous comments to ensure consistency across the entire codebase.
22-22: LGTM! Verify usage consistency throughout the codebase.The assignment of the
crosschainKeeperparameter to thecrosschainKeeperfield in theKeeperstruct is consistent with the previous changes.To ensure full consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of
crosschainKeeper:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistent usage of crosschainKeeper throughout the codebase # Test: Search for any remaining instances of crossChainKeeper (old naming) rg --type go 'crossChainKeeper' # Test: Search for new instances of crosschainKeeper rg --type go 'crosschainKeeper'x/crosschain/precompile/expected_keepers.go (1)
24-24: LGTM! Consistent naming convention applied.The change from
CrossChainBaseCointoCrosschainBaseCoinaligns with the PR objective and improves naming consistency. The method signature remains unchanged, preserving its functionality.To ensure all references to this method have been updated, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All Method References Updated
All instances of
CrossChainBaseCoinhave been successfully updated toCrosschainBaseCoinacross the codebase. No remaining references found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'CrossChainBaseCoin' in the codebase # Test: Search for 'CrossChainBaseCoin'. Expect: No results, as all instances should have been updated. rg --type go 'CrossChainBaseCoin' # Test: Verify the new method name is used correctly. Expect: Only instances of the new method name. rg --type go 'CrosschainBaseCoin'Length of output: 475
solidity/contracts/bridge/ICrosschain.sol (1)
9-9: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The interface renaming from
ICrossChaintoICrosschainis consistent with the PR objective. This change improves naming consistency.To ensure all references to this interface have been updated, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful!
All references toICrossChainhave been updated toICrosschainacross the codebase, and no casing inconsistencies were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to ICrossChain # Test 1: Search for ICrossChain (old name) echo "Searching for ICrossChain references:" rg --type solidity -i 'ICrossChain' # Test 2: Verify ICrosschain (new name) usage echo "Verifying ICrosschain usage:" rg --type solidity -i 'ICrosschain' # Test 3: Check for any mismatched casing echo "Checking for mismatched casing:" rg --type solidity -i 'icrosschain|Icrosschain|ICrosschaiN'Length of output: 457
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to ICrossChain using file extensions # Test 1: Search for ICrossChain (old name) echo "Searching for ICrossChain references:" rg -g '*.sol' -i 'ICrossChain' # Test 2: Verify ICrosschain (new name) usage echo "Verifying ICrosschain usage:" rg -g '*.sol' -i 'ICrosschain' # Test 3: Check for any mismatched casing echo "Checking for mismatched casing:" rg -g '*.sol' -i 'icrosschain|Icrosschain|ICrosschaiN'Length of output: 2881
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Accurately check for any remaining case-sensitive references to ICrossChain # Test 1: Search for ICrossChain (old name) with case-sensitive search echo "Searching for ICrossChain references (case-sensitive):" rg -g '*.sol' 'ICrossChain' # Test 2: Verify ICrosschain (new name) usage with case-sensitive search echo "Verifying ICrosschain usage (case-sensitive):" rg -g '*.sol' 'ICrosschain' # Test 3: Check for any mismatched casing excluding exact matches echo "Checking for mismatched casing:" rg -g '*.sol' 'icrosschain|Icrosschain|ICrosschaiN'Length of output: 1248
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go (1)
23-23: LGTM! Verify consistent naming across the codebase.The renaming of
crossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperis consistent with the PR objective. However, to ensure consistency, we should verify that this naming convention has been applied uniformly across the entire codebase.Let's run a script to check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" or "crossChain" in the codebase:
This will help ensure that the renaming has been applied consistently throughout the project.
x/crosschain/precompile/contract.go (1)
37-37: LGTM! Consistent renaming of CrossChain to Crosschain.The change from
NewCrossChainMethodtoNewCrosschainMethodis in line with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This change improves naming consistency across the codebase.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in the renaming process across the Go files in the project.
contract/compile.sh (1)
34-35: LGTM! Verify contract renaming consistency.The renaming of
ICrossChaintoICrosschainandCrossChainTesttoCrosschainTestis consistent with the PR objective. The changes maintain proper camel case convention for contract names.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in the renaming process across the entire codebase.
solidity/contracts/test/CrosschainTest.sol (6)
Line range hint
53-59: LGTM. Interface name updated correctly.The interface name in the method call has been correctly updated to "ICrosschain" while maintaining the same function signature.
68-68: LGTM. Interface name updated correctly.The interface name in the method call has been correctly updated to "ICrosschain" while maintaining the same function signature.
Line range hint
82-90: LGTM. Interface name updated correctly.The interface name in the method call has been correctly updated to "ICrosschain" while maintaining the same function signature.
Line range hint
1-92: Overall LGTM. Consistent renaming implemented.The changes in this file are consistent with the PR objective of renaming "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". All relevant occurrences have been updated, including the import statement, contract name, and interface references in method calls. The functionality of the contract remains unchanged, which is correct for this type of refactoring.
12-12: LGTM. Verify other occurrences.The contract name has been correctly updated to reflect the new naming convention.
Let's verify that there are no remaining occurrences of "CrossChainTest" in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following corrected shell script to verify that there are no remaining occurrences of "CrossChainTest" in Solidity files:
Please run the following shell script to verify that there are no remaining case-sensitive occurrences of "CrossChainTest" in Solidity files:
LGTM. All occurrences of "CrossChainTest" have been successfully updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining occurrences of "CrossChainTest" if rg -i "CrossChainTest" --type solidity; then echo "Warning: Found occurrences of 'CrossChainTest'. Please review and update these." else echo "No occurrences of 'CrossChainTest' found. All references seem to be updated." fiLength of output: 334
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining occurrences of "CrossChainTest" in Solidity files if rg -i "CrossChainTest" --glob "*.sol"; then echo "Warning: Found occurrences of 'CrossChainTest'. Please review and update these." else echo "No occurrences of 'CrossChainTest' found. All references seem to be updated." fiLength of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining case-sensitive occurrences of "CrossChainTest" in Solidity files if rg "CrossChainTest" --glob "*.sol"; then echo "Warning: Found occurrences of 'CrossChainTest'. Please review and update these." else echo "No occurrences of 'CrossChainTest' found. All references seem to be updated." fiLength of output: 203
6-6: LGTM. Verify file rename.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the new naming convention.
Let's verify that the file has been renamed in the repository:
✅ Verification successful
Naming Consistency Verified Successfully
All references to "CrossChain" and "cross chain" in the
TestIsOracleOnlinefunction have been updated to "Crosschain" or "crosschain" respectively.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" or "cross chain" in the TestIsOracleOnline function # Test: Search for "CrossChain" or "cross chain" in the TestIsOracleOnline function rg --type go -i '(CrossChain|cross chain)' x/crosschain/precompile/is_oracle_online_test.goLength of output: 837
x/ibc/middleware/keeper/relay.go (4)
39-39: Approved: Consistent renaming ofcrossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperThis change aligns with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". The function call has been updated correctly, maintaining the existing functionality while improving naming consistency throughout the codebase.
60-60: Approved: Consistent renaming ofcrossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperThis change aligns with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". The function call has been updated correctly, maintaining the existing functionality while improving naming consistency throughout the codebase.
84-84: Approved: Consistent renaming ofcrossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperThis change aligns with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". The function call has been updated correctly, maintaining the existing functionality while improving naming consistency throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
1-84: Summary: Consistent renaming improves code clarityThe changes in this file successfully implement the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". All instances of
crossChainKeeperhave been updated tocrosschainKeeper, improving naming consistency throughout the codebase. These changes are purely nomenclature-related and do not alter the functionality of the code. The consistent naming will enhance code readability and maintain a standardized terminology across the project.solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol (3)
Line range hint
1-95: Summary: Consistent renaming of CrossChain to CrosschainThe changes in this file are limited to renaming the
ICrossChaininterface toICrosschain. This modification is consistent throughout the file and aligns with the PR objective. The contract's logic and functionality remain unchanged, with only the interface name being updated.Key points:
- Import statement updated to use
ICrosschain.- Two method calls in the
isOnlinefunction updated to use the new interface name.These changes appear to be correct and maintain the contract's original behavior.
56-60: LGTM! Ensure successful compilation with interface changes.The
isOnlinefunction has been correctly updated to use the newICrosschaininterface name. The logic of the function remains unchanged, maintaining its original functionality.To ensure that the contract compiles correctly with these changes, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify successful compilation of the BridgeFeeOracle contract # Test: Attempt to compile the contract echo "Attempting to compile BridgeFeeOracle.sol:" solc --optimize --bin solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol # Note: This script assumes that solc (Solidity compiler) is installed and available in the PATH. # If compilation fails, review the error messages and make necessary adjustments.
10-10: LGTM! Verify consistent usage of the renamed interface.The import statement has been correctly updated to use the new
ICrosschaininterface name, which aligns with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain".To ensure consistent usage of the renamed interface throughout the file, run the following script:
x/crosschain/types/contract.go (4)
14-15: LGTM: Consistent renaming of variablesThe renaming of
crossChainAddresstocrosschainAddressandcrossChainABItocrosschainABIis consistent with the PR objective and maintains the camelCase naming convention.
19-19: LGTM: Updated return statementsThe return statements in
GetAddressandGetABIfunctions have been correctly updated to use the renamed variablescrosschainAddressandcrosschainABI.Also applies to: 23-23
Line range hint
1-180: Summary: Consistent renaming throughout the fileThe changes in this file are aligned with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". The modifications include:
- Renaming variables
crossChainAddressandcrossChainABI.- Updating return statements in
GetAddressandGetABIfunctions.- Renaming the
CrossChainArgsstruct toCrosschainArgs.These changes maintain the existing coding style and conventions without introducing any functional modifications. The renaming has been applied consistently throughout the file.
Line range hint
53-62: LGTM: Consistent renaming of structThe renaming of
CrossChainArgstoCrosschainArgsis consistent with the PR objective. TheValidatemethod signature has been correctly updated, and no changes have been made to the struct fields or validation logic.To ensure that all references to this struct have been updated throughout the codebase, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
CrosschainArgshas been successfully renamed and all references are updated accordingly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all occurrences of CrossChainArgs have been renamed to CrosschainArgs # Test: Search for any remaining instances of CrossChainArgs echo "Searching for remaining instances of CrossChainArgs:" rg --type go "CrossChainArgs" # Test: Verify the usage of the new CrosschainArgs echo "Verifying usage of CrosschainArgs:" rg --type go "CrosschainArgs"Length of output: 737
x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.go (5)
35-35: LGTM. Method receiver updates are consistent.The updates to the method receivers from
(m *CrossChainMethod)to(m *CrosschainMethod)are consistent with the struct renaming. The method bodies remain unchanged, which is correct.Also applies to: 39-39, 43-43, 47-47
95-97: LGTM. Method call updates are consistent.The updates to the method calls from
CrossChainBaseCointoCrosschainBaseCoinandNewCrossChainEventtoNewCrosschainEventare consistent with the overall renaming effort. The parameters and the rest of the method body remain unchanged, which is correct.Also applies to: 100-100
114-114: LGTM. Method renaming is consistent.The renaming of the method from
NewCrossChainEventtoNewCrosschainEventis consistent with the overall renaming effort. The method signature and body remain unchanged, which is correct.
118-119: LGTM. Argument type update is consistent.The update of the argument type from
CrossChainArgstoCrosschainArgsin theUnpackInputmethod is consistent with the overall renaming effort. The method body remains unchanged, which is correct.
126-126: LGTM. Argument type update is consistent.The update of the argument type from
CrossChainArgstoCrosschainArgsin thePackInputmethod is consistent with the overall renaming effort. The method body remains unchanged, which is correct.x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
131-133: LGTM! Verify method usage across the codebase.The renaming of
CrossChainParams()toCrosschainParams()is consistent with the PR objective. The functionality remains unchanged.To ensure all occurrences have been updated, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Method usage correctly updated across the codebase.
All instances of
CrossChainParamshave been successfully renamed toCrosschainParamsin the active codebase. Remaining references in legacy files are expected and do not impact the current functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all occurrences of CrossChainParams have been updated to CrosschainParams # Test: Search for any remaining occurrences of CrossChainParams rg --type go 'CrossChainParams' # Test: Confirm the new method name is used correctly rg --type go 'CrosschainParams'Length of output: 17961
x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call_test.go (2)
141-141: LGTM: Consistent renaming in variable declarationThe change from
ICrossChainBridgeCallEventtoICrosschainBridgeCallEventin the variable declaration is consistent with the previous change and the overall PR objective.
110-110: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CrossChain to CrosschainThe change from
ICrossChainBridgeCallEventtoICrosschainBridgeCallEventis consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain".To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify this change:
✅ Verification successful
: The renaming of
ICrossChainBridgeCallEventtoICrosschainBridgeCallEventhas been successfully verified across the codebase with no remaining instances of the old name found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the renaming of ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent to ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent # Check for any remaining instances of ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent echo "Checking for any remaining instances of ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent:" rg "ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent" --type go # Check for the new instances of ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent echo "Checking for new instances of ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent:" rg "ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent" --type goLength of output: 2446
x/crosschain/keeper/many_to_one.go (1)
161-163: Approve changes and verify usageThe modifications to
AfterIBCAckSuccessimprove error handling by propagating any errors fromDeleteCache. This change enhances the robustness of the code.To ensure all callers of this function are updated to handle the new error return, please run the following script:
This will help identify any locations where the function is called and allow us to verify that the error is being handled appropriately.
✅ Verification successful
Verified Error Handling in
AfterIBCAckSuccessAll calls to
AfterIBCAckSuccessproperly handle and propagate returned errors, ensuring robust error management throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to AfterIBCAckSuccess are updated to handle the error return # Test: Search for function calls to AfterIBCAckSuccess rg --type go -e 'AfterIBCAckSuccess\s*\(' -A 3Length of output: 817
x/crosschain/precompile/contract_test.go (3)
59-59: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CrossChain to CrosschainThe change from
CrossChainTestMetaDatatoCrosschainTestMetaDatais consistent with the PR objective of renaming "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" for improved naming consistency.
Line range hint
116-133: LGTM: Consistent renaming and usage of CrosschainKeepersThe method
CrossChainKeepers()has been appropriately renamed toCrosschainKeepers(), aligning with the PR's objective. The internal logic remains unchanged, preserving the existing functionality. The renamed method is correctly used inGenerateModuleName(), demonstrating consistent application of the naming change throughout the file.
Line range hint
1-283: Summary: Consistent renaming from CrossChain to CrosschainThis file has been updated to consistently rename "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" throughout. The changes include:
- Updating the contract deployment to use
CrosschainTestMetaData.- Renaming the
CrossChainKeepers()method toCrosschainKeepers().These modifications align with the PR objective and maintain the existing functionality while improving naming consistency. No logical changes or issues were introduced by these updates.
x/crosschain/keeper/bridge_call_out.go (1)
Line range hint
1-355: Summary of changes in bridge_call_out.goThe primary change in this file is the renaming of the
CrossChainBaseCoinfunction toCrosschainBaseCoin. This change aligns with the PR objective of standardizing the "crosschain" terminology throughout the codebase. The function's logic and implementation remain unchanged, maintaining the existing functionality for both IBC and non-IBC transfers.This change is consistent with the PR objectives and doesn't introduce any functional modifications or potential issues. The standardization of terminology will improve code readability and maintain consistency across the project.
x/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
260-260: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CrossChain to CrosschainThe change from "set CrossChainParam" to "set CrosschainParam" is in line with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This change maintains consistency across the codebase without affecting the test's functionality.
tests/contract/CrossChainTest.go (8)
32-35: LGTM: Consistent renaming of metadata variableThe renaming of
CrossChainTestMetaDatatoCrosschainTestMetaDatais consistent with the overall change from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". The content of the metadata remains unchanged, preserving the contract's ABI and bytecode.
38-44: LGTM: Consistent renaming of ABI and Bin variablesThe renaming of
CrossChainTestABItoCrosschainTestABIandCrossChainTestBintoCrosschainTestBinis consistent. The deprecation notices have been correctly updated to refer toCrosschainTestMetaData.ABIandCrosschainTestMetaData.Binrespectively.
46-60: LGTM: Consistent renaming and updating of DeployCrosschainTest functionThe
DeployCrosschainTestfunction has been correctly renamed and updated. The function signature, return type, and struct initialization in the return statement have all been consistently changed to use the new "Crosschain" naming convention. The core logic of the function remains unchanged.
63-119: LGTM: Consistent renaming of struct definitionsAll struct definitions have been consistently renamed from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This includes the main
CrosschainTeststruct and its associated types (Caller, Transactor, Filterer, Session, etc.). The comments for each struct have been appropriately updated to reflect the new names. These changes maintain the original structure and functionality of the types.
Line range hint
122-165: LGTM: Consistent renaming and updating of New and bind functions**The functions
NewCrosschainTest,NewCrosschainTestCaller,NewCrosschainTestTransactor,NewCrosschainTestFilterer, andbindCrosschainTesthave been consistently renamed and updated. The function signatures, return types, and internal logic have all been correctly adjusted to use the new "Crosschain" naming convention. The core functionality of these functions remains intact.
171-202: LGTM: Consistent renaming of raw contract interaction methodsThe methods for
CrosschainTestRaw,CrosschainTestCallerRaw, andCrosschainTestTransactorRawhave been consistently renamed. The function bodies remain unchanged except for the necessary type name updates. These changes maintain the original functionality of the raw contract interaction methods while adhering to the new naming convention.
Line range hint
239-264: LGTM: Consistent renaming of BridgeCoinAmount methodThe
BridgeCoinAmountmethod has been correctly updated forCrosschainTestCaller,CrosschainTestSession, andCrosschainTestCallerSession. These changes are consistent with the new naming convention and preserve the original functionality of the method.
Line range hint
1-285: Overall: Consistent and thorough renaming with minor suggestions for improvementThe renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" has been applied consistently throughout the file. All struct definitions, function names, and variable names have been updated accordingly. The core functionality of the contract bindings remains unchanged.
Two minor suggestions were made for further improvement:
- Consider renaming the
CROSSCHAINADDRESSmethod toCrosschainAddressfor better alignment with Go naming conventions.- For complete consistency, consider changing the
CrossChainmethod name toCrosschain.These changes have successfully standardized the naming convention in the codebase while maintaining its functionality.
app/keepers/keepers.go (3)
Line range hint
332-348: LGTM: Consistent renaming and improved clarityThe changes in this segment, including the introduction of
crosschainPrecompileRouterand the added comment, are consistent with the PR objective and improve code clarity.
Line range hint
510-520: LGTM: Consistent renaming and improved readabilityThe changes in this segment, including the added comment and consistent use of
crosschainPrecompileRouter, align with the PR objective and enhance code readability.
Line range hint
1-624: Overall assessment: Consistent renaming with one minor issueThe changes in this file successfully achieve the main objective of renaming "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". The modifications improve code clarity and readability. However, there's one instance where the old name is still used in the
ToSlice()method, which should be updated for consistency.Please address the issue mentioned in the previous comment, and the changes will be fully consistent with the PR objective.
x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (9)
17-20: LGTM: Interface renamed for consistency.The renaming of
CrossChainMsgtoCrosschainMsgis consistent with the overall goal of standardizing the naming convention. The interface functionality remains unchanged.
24-43: LGTM: Type assertions updated consistently.The type assertions have been correctly updated to use the new
CrosschainMsginterface name. All relevant message types are still properly asserting the interface, maintaining the correct type relationships.
74-74: LGTM: Error message updated for consistency.The error message has been appropriately updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain", maintaining consistency with the new naming convention.
96-96: LGTM: Error message updated consistently.The error message in the
ValidateBasicmethod ofMsgAddDelegatehas been correctly updated to use "crosschain", maintaining consistency with the new naming convention.
109-109: LGTM: Error messages consistently updated across multiple methods.The error messages in the
ValidateBasicmethods ofMsgReDelegate,MsgEditBridger,MsgWithdrawReward, andMsgUnbondedOraclehave all been consistently updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". This change maintains consistency with the new naming convention across the codebase.Also applies to: 122-122, 138-138, 148-148
171-171: LGTM: Error messages consistently updated in multiple validation methods.The error messages in the
ValidateBasicmethods ofMsgOracleSetConfirm,MsgSendToExternal, andMsgConfirmBatchhave all been consistently updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". This change maintains consistency with the new naming convention throughout the validation logic.Also applies to: 190-190, 212-212
234-234: LGTM: Error messages consistently updated in bridge-related message validations.The error messages in the
ValidateBasicmethods ofMsgBridgeCallConfirm,MsgBridgeCallClaim, andMsgBridgeCallResultClaimhave all been consistently updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". This change ensures consistency with the new naming convention across bridge-related message validations.Also applies to: 363-363, 484-484
528-528: LGTM: Error messages consistently updated in claim-related message validations.The error messages in the
ValidateBasicmethods ofMsgSendToExternalClaim,MsgBridgeTokenClaim, andMsgOracleSetUpdatedClaimhave all been consistently updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". This change maintains consistency with the new naming convention across claim-related message validations.Also applies to: 559-559, 604-604
643-643: LGTM: Error messages consistently updated in parameter update validations.The error messages in the
ValidateBasicmethods ofMsgUpdateParamsandMsgUpdateChainOracleshave been consistently updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". This change ensures consistency with the new naming convention in parameter update-related message validations.Also applies to: 659-659
contract/contract.go (2)
17-17: Consistent renaming of CrossChainAddress to CrosschainAddressThe constant
CrossChainAddresshas been renamed toCrosschainAddress. This change aligns with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain" for consistency.To ensure this change is consistent throughout the codebase, let's run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" (case-sensitive) rg --type go "CrossChain" # Check for any instances of "Crosschain" (case-sensitive) to verify the new naming rg --type go "Crosschain"
Line range hint
1-240: Consider updating related code and documentationWhile the constant renaming is the only visible change in this file, it's important to ensure that this change is reflected consistently across the entire codebase. This may include updating any references to the old constant name in other files, updating documentation, and potentially adjusting any external integrations that might be using the old constant name.
To help identify potential areas that might need updates, we can run the following search:
✅ Verification successful
The constant
CrossChainAddresshas been successfully renamed and is consistently used across the codebase. No additional references to the old constant name were found outside ofcontract/contract.go, ensuring that the renaming does not impact other parts of the code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for files containing "CrossChainAddress" (excluding the current file) rg --type go "CrossChainAddress" --glob '!contract/contract.go'Length of output: 74713
contract/ICrossChain.go (7)
41-45: LGTM: Consistent struct renamingThe renaming of the
ICrossChainstruct toICrosschainand its fields is consistent and correct.
48-59: LGTM: Consistent type renamingThe renaming of various types from
ICrossChain*toICrosschain*is consistent and correct.
63-97: LGTM: Consistent session and raw type renamingThe renaming of session and raw types from
ICrossChain*toICrosschain*is consistent and correct.
100-137: LGTM: Consistent function renamingThe renaming of functions from
NewICrossChain*toNewICrosschain*andbindICrossChaintobindICrosschainis consistent and correct.
Line range hint
149-273: LGTM: Consistent method renamingThe renaming of methods from
ICrossChain*toICrosschain*is consistent and correct.
Line range hint
339-502: LGTM: Consistent event iterator renamingThe renaming of event iterators from
ICrossChain*toICrosschain*is consistent and correct.
Line range hint
509-812: LGTM: Consistent renaming throughout the fileThe renaming of remaining types and functions from
ICrossChain*toICrosschain*is consistent and correct. Overall, the changes in this file maintain consistency in renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" throughout the entire file.Summary of changes:
- All occurrences of
ICrossChainhave been renamed toICrosschain.- The renaming affects variables, structs, interfaces, and function names.
- The changes are consistent and do not introduce any logical errors.
The only suggestion is to update the file name in the comment at the top of the file to reflect the new name
ICrosschain.go.x/crosschain/types/msgs_test.go (11)
51-51: Approved: Consistent error message updateThe error message for an unrecognized chain name has been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". This change is consistent with the PR objective and improves message consistency.
60-60: Approved: Consistent error message updateThe error message for an invalid chain name has been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". This change maintains consistency with the previous update and aligns with the PR objective.
208-208: Approved: Consistent error message updates in TestMsgAddDelegate_ValidateBasicThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 217-217
304-304: Approved: Consistent error message updates in TestMsgOracleSetConfirm_ValidateBasicThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 313-313
436-436: Approved: Consistent error message updates in TestMsgOracleSetUpdatedClaim_ValidateBasicThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 445-445
621-621: Approved: Consistent error message updates in TestMsgBridgeTokenClaim_ValidateBasicThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 630-630
816-816: Approved: Consistent error message updates in TestMsgSendToFxClaim_ValidateBasicThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 825-825
1039-1039: Approved: Consistent error message updates in TestMsgSendToExternal_ValidateBasicThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 1048-1048
1173-1173: Approved: Consistent error message updates in TestMsgSendToExternalClaim_ValidateBasicThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain". These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 1182-1182
1309-1309: Approved: Consistent error message updates across multiple test functionsThe error messages for empty and invalid chain names have been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain" in TestConfirmBatch_ValidateBasic, TestUpdateChainOraclesProposal_ValidateBasic, and TestMsgBridgeCallConfirm_ValidateBasic. These changes maintain consistency with previous updates and align with the PR objective.
Also applies to: 1318-1318, 1470-1470, 1564-1564
Line range hint
1-1700: Summary: Consistent updates to error messages across the test suiteThis PR successfully updates all error messages related to chain name validation in the
x/crosschain/types/msgs_test.gofile. The changes replace "cross chain" with "crosschain" in error messages, improving consistency throughout the test suite. These modifications align with the PR objective and maintain the clarity and informativeness of the error messages.The updates affect multiple test functions, including:
- TestMsgBondedOracle_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgAddDelegate_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgOracleSetConfirm_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgOracleSetUpdatedClaim_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgBridgeTokenClaim_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgSendToFxClaim_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgSendToExternal_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgSendToExternalClaim_ValidateBasic
- TestConfirmBatch_ValidateBasic
- TestUpdateChainOraclesProposal_ValidateBasic
- TestMsgBridgeCallConfirm_ValidateBasic
These changes contribute to a more consistent and maintainable codebase.
| @@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ import ( | |||
| type Keeper struct { | |||
| cdc codec.Codec | |||
| evmKeeper types.EvmKeeper | |||
| crossChainKeeper types.CrossChainKeeper | |||
| crosschainKeeper types.CrosschainKeeper | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Further Verification Needed: Ensure all instances of CrossChainKeeper have been renamed to crosschainKeeper.
It appears that CrosschainKeeper was not found in the types package, which may indicate incomplete renaming.
To confirm and ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of CrossChainKeeper in the entire codebase
rg --type go 'CrossChainKeeper'🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify corresponding changes in the types package.
The renaming of crossChainKeeper to crosschainKeeper is consistent with the PR objective and improves naming consistency.
To ensure full consistency, let's verify the corresponding change in the types package:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the renaming of CrossChainKeeper to CrosschainKeeper in the types package
# Test: Search for CrosschainKeeper in the types package
rg --type go -g 'x/ibc/middleware/types/*.go' 'type CrosschainKeeper'
Length of output: 4739
zakir-code
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrations.go (1)
18-18: Approved: Consistent renaming of "cross chain" to "crosschain"The changes in the
Migratorstruct and its constructor are consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This improves naming consistency throughout the codebase.For even better consistency, consider updating the parameter name
cksin theNewMigratorfunction toccks(short for crosschainKeepers). This would make it clearer that it corresponds to thecrosschainKeepersfield. Here's a suggested change:-func NewMigrator(storeKey storetypes.StoreKey, cdc codec.BinaryCodec, keeper keeper.Keeper, bk bankkeeper.Keeper, cks []crosschainkeeper.Keeper) Migrator { +func NewMigrator(storeKey storetypes.StoreKey, cdc codec.BinaryCodec, keeper keeper.Keeper, bk bankkeeper.Keeper, ccks []crosschainkeeper.Keeper) Migrator { return Migrator{ storeKey: storeKey, cdc: cdc, keeper: keeper, bankKeeper: bk, - crosschainKeepers: cks, + crosschainKeepers: ccks, } }This change is optional but would enhance the overall consistency of the naming convention.
Also applies to: 27-27
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- contract/ICrosschain.go (30 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol (4 hunks)
- tests/contract/CrosschainTest.go (4 hunks)
- tests/precompile_suite.go (1 hunks)
- x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1 hunks)
- x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrations.go (2 hunks)
- x/erc20/module.go (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (23)
tests/precompile_suite.go (3)
53-53: LGTM: Consistent naming convention applied.The renaming of
crossChainContracttocrosschainContractimproves consistency with the overall naming convention changes in the codebase. The functionality remains unchanged.
59-59: LGTM: Consistent use of renamed variable.The use of the renamed
crosschainContractvariable in theBuildEthTransactionfunction call is correct and consistent with the earlier change. This ensures that the naming convention is applied uniformly throughout the method.
Line range hint
1-64: Overall: Consistent renaming applied successfully.The changes in this file correctly implement the renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" as part of the larger pull request objective. The modifications are consistent and do not alter the functionality of the code. The updated naming convention improves code readability and maintains consistency across the codebase.
x/erc20/module.go (4)
84-84: LGTM: Consistent renaming ofcrossChainKeeperstocrosschainKeepersThis change aligns with the PR objective and improves naming consistency throughout the codebase.
95-95: LGTM: Updated field assignment inNewAppModuleThe field assignment has been correctly updated to match the renamed
crosschainKeepersfield in theAppModulestruct.
114-114: LGTM: Updated usage ofcrosschainKeepersinRegisterServicesThe
RegisterServicesmethod now correctly uses the renamedcrosschainKeepersfield when initializing the migrator.
Line range hint
84-114: Summary: Consistent renaming ofcrossChaintocrosschainThe changes in this file consistently rename
crossChaintocrosschainin theAppModulestruct, its constructor, and theRegisterServicesmethod. These changes align with the PR objective and improve naming consistency throughout the codebase without altering the module's functionality.tests/contract/CrosschainTest.go (10)
32-35: LGTM: Consistent renaming of metadata variableThe renaming of
CrosschainTestMetaDatais consistent with the overall change from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". The content of the ABI and Bin remains unchanged, which is correct.
38-44: LGTM: Consistent renaming of ABI and Bin variablesThe renaming of
CrosschainTestABIandCrosschainTestBinis consistent with the overall change. The deprecation notices have been correctly updated to reflect the new names.
46-60: LGTM: Consistent renaming of deployment functionThe
DeployCrosschainTestfunction has been correctly renamed and its return type updated to*CrosschainTest. The internal logic remains unchanged, which is appropriate for this renaming task.
63-119: LGTM: Consistent renaming of struct definitionsAll struct definitions have been consistently renamed from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This includes the main
CrosschainTeststruct and its associatedCaller,Transactor,Filterer,Session, andRawstructs. The comments have been appropriately updated to reflect these changes.
122-155: LGTM: Consistent renaming of constructor functionsAll constructor functions (
NewCrosschainTest,NewCrosschainTestCaller,NewCrosschainTestTransactor,NewCrosschainTestFilterer) have been consistently renamed. The return types and internal logic have been correctly updated to use the new struct names, maintaining the overall functionality of the code.
Line range hint
158-164: LGTM: Consistent renaming of binding functionThe
bindCrosschainTestfunction has been correctly renamed. The internal logic remains unchanged, which is appropriate for this renaming task. This function is crucial for binding the contract, and its consistent renaming ensures that the rest of the code will work correctly with the renamed structures.
171-202: LGTM: Consistent renaming in raw contract interaction methodsThe receiver types for the Call, Transfer, and Transact methods have been correctly updated to use
CrosschainTest*. The internal logic of these methods remains unchanged, which is appropriate for this renaming task. This ensures that the low-level contract interactions will continue to function correctly with the renamed structures.
Line range hint
208-233: LGTM: Consistent renaming in CROSSCHAINADDRESS methodsThe CROSSCHAINADDRESS methods have been correctly updated to use
CrosschainTest*as receiver types. This includes the main Caller method, as well as the Session and CallerSession variants. The internal logic and return types remain unchanged, ensuring that the contract's cross-chain functionality remains intact.
Line range hint
239-285: LGTM: Consistent renaming in BridgeCoinAmount and CrossChain methodsThe BridgeCoinAmount and CrossChain methods have been correctly updated to use
CrosschainTest*as receiver types. This includes all variants: Caller, Session, CallerSession, Transactor, and TransactorSession. The internal logic, parameters, and return types remain unchanged, ensuring that the core functionality of the contract binding remains intact.
Line range hint
1-285: LGTM: Comprehensive and consistent renaming from CrossChain to CrosschainThis review has covered the entire file, and I can confirm that the renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" has been carried out consistently and correctly throughout. All struct definitions, function names, method receivers, and comments have been updated appropriately. The core functionality of the contract binding remains unchanged, which is the desired outcome for this type of change.
Key points:
- Metadata, ABI, and Bin variables have been renamed correctly.
- All struct definitions have been updated consistently.
- Constructor functions and the binding function have been renamed appropriately.
- Raw contract interaction methods have been updated correctly.
- Specific contract methods (CROSSCHAINADDRESS, BridgeCoinAmount, CrossChain) have been renamed consistently across all their variations.
The changes in this file appear to be complete and correct, maintaining the integrity of the contract binding while updating the naming convention.
contract/ICrosschain.go (6)
32-33: Renaming of metadata and ABI variables is consistent.The changes to
ICrosschainMetaDataandICrosschainABIvariables are in line with the overall renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This maintains consistency throughout the codebase.Also applies to: 37-39
41-45: Consistent renaming of struct definitions.All struct definitions related to the Crosschain contract have been systematically renamed from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This includes the main struct, as well as Caller, Transactor, Filterer, Session, and Raw variants. The changes are consistent and maintain the intended naming convention throughout the codebase.
Also applies to: 48-49, 53-54, 58-59, 63-69, 71-75, 78-82, 85-87, 90-92, 95-97
100-106: Constructor functions renamed consistently.The constructor functions for creating new instances of the Crosschain contract and its related structs have been systematically renamed from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This includes
NewICrosschain,NewICrosschainCaller,NewICrosschainTransactor,NewICrosschainFilterer, and thebindICrosschainfunction. These changes are consistent with the overall renaming strategy.Also applies to: 109-115, 118-124, 127-133, 136-143
149-150: Method implementations renamed consistently across all structs.All method implementations for the Crosschain contract and its related structs have been systematically renamed from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This includes methods for ICrosschainRaw, ICrosschainCallerRaw, ICrosschainTransactorRaw, ICrosschainCaller, ICrosschainTransactor, ICrosschainSession, ICrosschainCallerSession, and ICrosschainTransactorSession. The renaming is consistent across all methods, including BridgeCoinAmount, HasOracle, IsOracleOnline, BridgeCall, CrossChain, and ExecuteClaim.
Also applies to: 155-156, 160-161, 168-169, 174-175, 179-180, 186-211, 217-242, 248-273, 279-294, 300-315, 321-336
339-341: Event-related structs and methods renamed consistently.All event-related structs and methods have been systematically renamed from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This includes:
- Event iterators (e.g.,
ICrosschainBridgeCallEventIterator)- Event structs (e.g.,
ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent)- Filter, Watch, and Parse methods for each event
The renaming is consistent across all events, including BridgeCallEvent, CrossChain, and ExecuteClaimEvent.
Overall, the entire file demonstrates a thorough and consistent renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This systematic approach helps maintain code consistency and reduces the likelihood of naming-related errors.
Also applies to: 355-364, 395-401, 406-407, 425-444, 450-476, 500-506, 509-813
Line range hint
1-813: Summary: Consistent renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain"This file has undergone a comprehensive renaming process, changing all instances of "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". The changes include:
- Struct definitions
- Variable names
- Function and method names
- Event-related structs and methods
The renaming has been applied consistently throughout the file, maintaining the existing functionality while improving naming convention consistency. This change enhances code readability and reduces the potential for confusion or errors related to inconsistent naming.
Recommendations:
- Ensure that this renaming is applied consistently across the entire codebase, including any references to this contract in other files.
- Update any documentation or comments that may reference the old "CrossChain" naming.
- If this contract is already deployed, consider the potential impacts on existing integrations and ensure proper communication with affected parties.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain_test.go (1)
12-12: LGTM: Variable and method names updated correctly.The variable name has been changed from
crossChaintocrosschain, and the method call has been updated fromNewCrossChainMethodtoNewCrosschainMethod. These changes are consistent with the PR objective and improve overall consistency in the codebase.Consider using a more descriptive variable name, such as
crosschainMethodorcrosschainPrecompile, to improve code readability. For example:crosschainMethod := precompile.NewCrosschainMethod(nil)x/erc20/types/token.go (1)
29-29: Approved style change, but TODO comment needs improvementThe capitalization of "TODO" improves consistency with common coding conventions. However, the TODO comment could be more informative:
- Consider adding more context about why this change is needed and what benefits
crosschaintypes.NewBridgeTokenwould bring.- It's recommended to create an issue to track this TODO and reference it in the comment.
Here's a suggested improvement for the comment:
- return fmt.Sprintf("%s%s", m.ChainName, m.Contract) // TODO: replace with crosschaintypes.NewBridgeToken + return fmt.Sprintf("%s%s", m.ChainName, m.Contract) // TODO(#ISSUE_NUMBER): Replace with crosschaintypes.NewBridgeToken for improved cross-chain compatibility and standardizationReplace
#ISSUE_NUMBERwith the actual issue number once created.x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrations.go (2)
18-18: LGTM! Consider improving variable naming consistency.The changes correctly rename
crossChainKeeperstocrosschainKeepers, which aligns with the PR objective of standardizing "crosschain" terminology. This improves naming consistency throughout the codebase.For even better consistency, consider updating the parameter name
cksin theNewMigratorfunction tocrosschainKeepers. This would make it clearer and more consistent with the field name:-func NewMigrator(storeKey storetypes.StoreKey, cdc codec.BinaryCodec, keeper keeper.Keeper, bk bankkeeper.Keeper, cks []crosschainkeeper.Keeper) Migrator { +func NewMigrator(storeKey storetypes.StoreKey, cdc codec.BinaryCodec, keeper keeper.Keeper, bk bankkeeper.Keeper, crosschainKeepers []crosschainkeeper.Keeper) Migrator { return Migrator{ storeKey: storeKey, cdc: cdc, keeper: keeper, bankKeeper: bk, - crosschainKeepers: cks, + crosschainKeepers: crosschainKeepers, } }This change would improve readability and maintain consistency with the field name.
Also applies to: 27-27
Line range hint
31-34: Consider adding documentation to theMigrate3to4function.While the function name suggests its purpose, it would be helpful to add a brief comment explaining what specific changes or updates are being made in this migration step. This would improve the maintainability of the code and make it easier for other developers to understand the migration process.
Consider adding a comment like this:
// Migrate3to4 migrates from version 3 to 4. // It performs necessary updates to the token data structure or any other relevant changes. // The specific changes made in this migration step include: [List the main changes here] func (m Migrator) Migrate3to4(ctx sdk.Context) error { return m.MigrateToken(ctx) }Replace the placeholder text with the actual changes being made in this migration step.
x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go (1)
23-24: LGTM! Consider updating the interface name for consistency.The renaming of
crossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperis consistent with the PR objective of standardizing the "crosschain" terminology. The change has been applied correctly in both the function signature and its usage within the function body.For complete consistency, consider updating the
CrosschainKeeperinterface name in the function signature to follow the same naming convention:- func (c *Keeper) EvmTokenToBaseCoin(ctx sdk.Context, evm *vm.EVM, crosschainKeeper CrosschainKeeper, holder, tokenAddr common.Address, amount *big.Int) (sdk.Coin, error) { + func (c *Keeper) EvmTokenToBaseCoin(ctx sdk.Context, evm *vm.EVM, crosschainKeeper CrossChainKeeper, holder, tokenAddr common.Address, amount *big.Int) (sdk.Coin, error) {This change would ensure that the interface name matches the naming convention used in other parts of the codebase.
contract/compile.sh (1)
Line range hint
1-67: Consider the following improvements to enhance the script:While the script functions correctly, here are some suggestions to improve its robustness and maintainability:
Error Handling: Consider adding more explicit error handling, especially around critical operations like compilation and ABI generation.
Dynamic Contract Discovery: Instead of hardcoding contract lists, consider dynamically discovering contracts based on file patterns. This would make the script more maintainable as new contracts are added or removed.
DRY Principle: The ABI wrapper code generation process is repeated for core and test contracts. Consider refactoring this into a function to reduce code duplication.
Configuration File: Move hardcoded values (like required commands, version numbers, and contract lists) into a configuration file for easier management.
Here's a sketch of how you might implement these improvements:
#!/usr/bin/env bash set -eo pipefail # Load configuration source ./compile_config.sh # Function to check required commands check_required_commands() { for cmd in "${REQUIRED_COMMANDS[@]}"; do if ! command -v "$cmd" &>/dev/null; then echo "$cmd command not found, please install $cmd first" && exit 1 fi done } # Function to check abigen version check_abigen_version() { local version=$(abigen --version | awk '{print $3}') if ! [[ "$version" =~ ^${REQUIRED_ABIGEN_VERSION}.* ]]; then echo "expected abigen version ${REQUIRED_ABIGEN_VERSION}, but got $version, please upgrade abigen first" && exit 1 fi } # Function to generate ABI wrapper code generate_abi_wrapper() { local contract=$1 local output_dir=$2 echo "===> Ethereum ABI wrapper code generator: $contract" local file_path=$(find "$ARTIFACTS_DIR" -name "${contract}.json" -type f) jq -c '.abi' "$file_path" > "$TEMP_DIR/${contract}.abi" jq -r '.bytecode' "$file_path" > "$TEMP_DIR/${contract}.bin" abigen --abi "$TEMP_DIR/${contract}.abi" \ --bin "$TEMP_DIR/${contract}.bin" \ --type "${contract}" --pkg contract \ --out "$output_dir/${contract}.go" } # Main execution main() { check_required_commands check_abigen_version # Install node modules if necessary if [ ! -d "$SOLIDITY_DIR/node_modules" ]; then echo "===> Installing node modules" (cd "$SOLIDITY_DIR" && yarn install) fi # Clean and compile contracts echo "===> Cleaning artifacts" (cd "$SOLIDITY_DIR" && yarn clean) echo "===> Compiling contracts" (cd "$SOLIDITY_DIR" && yarn compile) # Create temporary directory for artifacts TEMP_DIR=$(mktemp -d) trap 'rm -rf "$TEMP_DIR"' EXIT # Generate ABI wrapper code for core contracts for contract in "${CORE_CONTRACTS[@]}"; do generate_abi_wrapper "$contract" "$CONTRACT_DIR" done # Generate ABI wrapper code for test contracts for contract in "${TEST_CONTRACTS[@]}"; do generate_abi_wrapper "$contract" "$TEST_CONTRACT_DIR" done } main "$@"This refactored version introduces functions for repeated tasks, uses a configuration file for constants, and implements more robust error handling. You would need to create a
compile_config.shfile with the necessary constants and arrays.x/crosschain/types/external_address.go (4)
69-69: Approved: Consistent terminology update, but consider improving error handlingThe error message has been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain", which aligns with the PR objective and improves consistency in terminology.
However, consider refactoring this function to return an error instead of using panic. This would improve error handling and make the function more robust.
Consider refactoring the function to return an error:
func ExternalAddrToAccAddr(chainName, addr string) (sdk.AccAddress, error) { router, ok := externalAddressRouter[chainName] if !ok { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", chainName) } return router.ExternalAddrToAccAddr(addr), nil }
77-77: Approved: Consistent terminology update, but consider improving error handlingThe error message has been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain", which aligns with the PR objective and improves consistency in terminology.
However, consider refactoring this function to return an error instead of using panic. This would improve error handling and make the function more robust.
Consider refactoring the function to return an error:
func ExternalAddrToHexAddr(chainName, addr string) (common.Address, error) { router, ok := externalAddressRouter[chainName] if !ok { return common.Address{}, fmt.Errorf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", chainName) } return router.ExternalAddrToHexAddr(addr), nil }
85-85: Approved: Consistent terminology update, but consider improving error handlingThe error message has been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain", which aligns with the PR objective and improves consistency in terminology.
However, consider refactoring this function to return an error instead of using panic. This would improve error handling and make the function more robust.
Consider refactoring the function to return an error:
func ExternalAddrToStr(chainName string, bz []byte) (string, error) { router, ok := externalAddressRouter[chainName] if !ok { return "", fmt.Errorf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", chainName) } return router.ExternalAddrToStr(bz), nil }
Line range hint
1-87: Consider a broader refactoring for error handlingWhile the terminology updates in this file are consistent and improve the overall coherence of the codebase, there's a recurring pattern of using
panicfor error handling in multiple functions (ExternalAddrToAccAddr,ExternalAddrToHexAddr, andExternalAddrToStr).Consider initiating a broader refactoring effort to replace these panics with proper error returns. This would improve the robustness and reliability of the code, making it easier to handle errors at higher levels of the application.
Here's a general pattern you could follow for these functions:
func SomeFunction(chainName string, ...) (..., error) { router, ok := externalAddressRouter[chainName] if !ok { return ..., fmt.Errorf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", chainName) } return router.SomeFunction(...), nil }This change would require updating the function signatures and all calling code, but it would significantly improve the error handling capabilities of your application.
x/crosschain/precompile/is_oracle_online_test.go (1)
15-15: Approve the renaming with a minor suggestion.The change from
TestCrossChainIsOracleOnlineABItoTestCrosschainIsOracleOnlineABIis consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". The functionality remains unchanged.For improved readability, consider using camel case for the entire name:
-func TestCrosschainIsOracleOnlineABI(t *testing.T) { +func TestCrosschainIsOracleOnlineAbi(t *testing.T) {This change would make the function name easier to read while still maintaining the correct naming convention for Go test functions.
x/crosschain/types/legacy.go (1)
62-62: Approved: Consistent terminology changeThe change from "unrecognized cross chain name" to "unrecognized crosschain name" aligns with the PR objective and improves consistency in terminology.
Consider further improving the error message for clarity:
- return sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrap("unrecognized crosschain name") + return sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrapf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", m.ChainName)This change would provide more context in the error message, making debugging easier.
x/crosschain/types/contract.go (1)
53-53: LGTM: Consistent renaming of struct and methodThe renaming of
CrossChainArgstoCrosschainArgsand the corresponding update to theValidate()method signature are consistent with the PR objective. The functionality remains unchanged.Consider adding a brief comment above the
CrosschainArgsstruct to describe its purpose, for improved code documentation. For example:// CrosschainArgs represents the arguments for a cross-chain transaction type CrosschainArgs struct { // ... existing fields ... }Also applies to: 62-62
x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.go (2)
20-23: Approved with suggestions for deprecation notices.The renaming from
CrossChaintoCrosschainis consistent with the PR objective. The deprecation notices are good practice, but could be improved.Consider enhancing the deprecation notices by including:
- The version in which these will be removed.
- The recommended alternative (e.g.,
BridgeCallMethod).Example:
// Deprecated: Use BridgeCallMethod instead. This will be removed in v9.0.0.Also applies to: 27-32
Line range hint
47-109: Approved with suggestion for potential refactoring.The renaming from
CrossChainBaseCointoCrosschainBaseCoinandNewCrossChainEventtoNewCrosschainEventis consistent with the PR objective. The overall logic remains unchanged.Consider breaking down this method into smaller, more focused functions to improve readability and maintainability. For example:
- A function to handle the token transfer logic.
- A function to handle the crosschain operation.
- A function to emit the event.
This refactoring would make the code easier to understand and test.
x/crosschain/keeper/msg_server_router.go (1)
122-122: LGTM! Consider a minor improvement for clarity.The change from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in the error message is consistent with the PR objective and improves terminology consistency throughout the codebase. The functionality remains unchanged.
For even better clarity, consider capitalizing "Crosschain" in the error message:
- return nil, sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrapf("Unrecognized crosschain type:%s", chainName) + return nil, sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrapf("Unrecognized Crosschain type: %s", chainName)This change would maintain consistency with typical error message formatting and improve readability.
x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call_test.go (1)
Inconsistent "CrossChain" Naming Across Codebase
The search detected multiple instances of "CrossChain" in the following files:
x/crosschain/types/legacy.go(multiple lines)x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.gotests/contract/CrosschainTest.gotests/precompile_suite.gotests/integration_test.gotests/crosschain_test.gocontract/ICrosschain.goapi/fx/gravity/crosschain/v1/legacy.pulsar.goThese occurrences should be renamed to "Crosschain" to maintain consistent naming conventions across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-199: Overall assessment: Changes are consistent and improve naming standardization.The modifications in this file are limited to renaming
ICrossChainBridgeCallEventtoICrosschainBridgeCallEvent, which aligns with the PR objectives. These changes contribute to the standardization of naming conventions across the codebase without altering the functionality of the tests.To ensure comprehensive consistency, it would be beneficial to run a codebase-wide check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" (case-sensitive) that should be updated to "Crosschain":
Review the results to determine if any other occurrences need to be updated for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of CrossChain rg --type go "CrossChain"Length of output: 29550
x/crosschain/precompile/contract_test.go (2)
Line range hint
116-133: LGTM: Consistent method renaming with a minor suggestionThe renaming of
CrossChainKeeperstoCrosschainKeepersis consistent with the overall changes in the codebase. The functionality remains the same, which is good.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider using a
switchstatement instead of anif-elsefor better readability when assigning thechainName:chainName := strings.TrimSuffix(strings.TrimPrefix(gravityID, "fx-"), "-bridge") switch chainName { case "bridge-eth": keepers["eth"] = value.Field(i).Interface().(crosschainkeeper.Keeper) default: keepers[chainName] = value.Field(i).Interface().(crosschainkeeper.Keeper) }This change would make the code slightly more idiomatic and easier to extend if more special cases are added in the future.
Line range hint
1-283: Overall assessment: Consistent renaming with no functional changesThe changes in this file are part of a larger effort to standardize the naming convention from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". All modifications are consistent and do not introduce any functional changes or potential issues. The test suite structure and helper functions remain intact, ensuring that the existing tests will continue to work as expected.
To further improve the codebase:
- Consider updating any related documentation or comments that might still use the old "CrossChain" terminology.
- Ensure that these naming changes are consistently applied across all related packages and modules in the project.
- If there are any external interfaces or APIs that use the "CrossChain" terminology, consider creating aliases or deprecation notices to maintain backward compatibility while encouraging the use of the new "Crosschain" naming convention.
x/crosschain/keeper/bridge_call_out.go (2)
Line range hint
279-303: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CrossChainBaseCoin to CrosschainBaseCoinThe renaming of this function aligns with the PR objective of standardizing "crosschain" terminology. The function's implementation remains unchanged, maintaining its existing functionality.
Consider updating the function's documentation (if any) to reflect the new name and ensure consistency throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
239-277: LGTM: Improved validation for IBC transfers in BridgeCallBaseCoinThe addition of validation checks for IBC transfers enhances the robustness of the function. The new checks ensure that the coins are valid and that there's exactly one coin for IBC transfers, which is a good practice.
Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate helper function to improve readability and maintainability. For example:
func validateIBCTransferCoins(coins sdk.Coins) error { if !coins.IsValid() || len(coins) != 1 { return sdkerrors.ErrInvalidCoins.Wrapf("ibc transfer with coins: %s", coins.String()) } return nil }Then, you can use it in the
BridgeCallBaseCoinfunction:if fxTarget.IsIBC() { if err := validateIBCTransferCoins(coins); err != nil { return 0, err } // ... rest of the IBC transfer logic }This approach would make the main function more concise and easier to read.
tests/contract/CrosschainTest.go (1)
Line range hint
208-285: LGTM with a suggestion: Consistent renaming of contract method bindingsThe renaming of contract method bindings is consistent with the overall renaming pattern. However, consider updating the method name "CROSSCHAINADDRESS" to follow Go naming conventions, such as "CrosschainAddress" or "GetCrosschainAddress".
Consider updating the following method names to follow Go naming conventions:
-func (_CrosschainTest *CrosschainTestCaller) CROSSCHAINADDRESS(opts *bind.CallOpts) (common.Address, error) { +func (_CrosschainTest *CrosschainTestCaller) CrosschainAddress(opts *bind.CallOpts) (common.Address, error) {Make sure to update all occurrences of this method name throughout the file.
x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (1)
74-74: Consistent error message update with room for improvementThe error message has been updated to reflect the new naming convention. However, consider making the error message more specific or adding context to aid in debugging.
Consider updating the error message to provide more context, for example:
- return sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrap("unrecognized crosschain name") + return sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrapf("unrecognized crosschain name: %s", m.ChainName)This change would make it easier to identify which specific chain name was unrecognized.
contract/contract.go (1)
Line range hint
43-134: LGTM: Well-structured contract handling. Consider adding error wrapping.The
Contractstruct and associated functions provide a clean interface for handling contract data. The utility functionsMustDecodeHexandMustABIJsonappropriately handle errors for initialization code.As a minor improvement, consider wrapping the errors in
MustDecodeHexandMustABIJsonwith more context before panicking. This can help with debugging if issues occur.Here's a suggested improvement for
MustDecodeHex:func MustDecodeHex(str string) []byte { bz, err := hexutil.Decode(str) if err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Errorf("failed to decode hex string: %w", err)) } return bz }And for
MustABIJson:func MustABIJson(str string) abi.ABI { j, err := abi.JSON(strings.NewReader(str)) if err != nil { - panic(err) + panic(fmt.Errorf("failed to parse ABI JSON: %w", err)) } return j }contract/ICrosschain.go (2)
100-106: Comprehensive update of function definitions and implementations.All functions related to the Crosschain contract have been correctly renamed and updated:
- Constructor functions (NewICrosschain, NewICrosschainCaller, etc.)
- bindICrosschain function
- Method receivers for various structs
- Getter functions (BridgeCoinAmount, HasOracle, IsOracleOnline)
- Mutator functions (BridgeCall, CrossChain, ExecuteClaim)
The renaming is consistent throughout the file and maintains the correct functionality of the contract bindings.
Suggestion for improvement:
For consistency in error handling, consider updating the error return in getter functions to use a named return value. For example, in theBridgeCoinAmountfunction:-func (_ICrosschain *ICrosschainCaller) BridgeCoinAmount(opts *bind.CallOpts, _token common.Address, _target [32]byte) (*big.Int, error) { +func (_ICrosschain *ICrosschainCaller) BridgeCoinAmount(opts *bind.CallOpts, _token common.Address, _target [32]byte) (amount *big.Int, err error) {This change would make the error handling consistent with other functions in the file and improve readability.
Also applies to: 109-115, 118-124, 127-133, 136-142, 149-150, 155-156, 160-161, 168-169, 174-175, 179-180, 186-211, 217-242, 248-273, 279-294, 300-315, 321-336
Incomplete Renaming Detected: Remaining "CrossChain" Instances Found
While the renaming to "Crosschain" in
contract/ICrosschain.gowas successful, the following files still contain instances of "CrossChain":
x/crosschain/types/legacy.gotests/precompile_suite.gotests/integration_test.gotests/contract/CrosschainTest.goapi/fx/gravity/crosschain/v1/legacy.pulsar.goPlease update these instances to "Crosschain" to maintain consistency throughout the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-807: Summary of changes: Comprehensive renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain"This pull request successfully renames all instances of "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" in the
ICrosschain.gofile. The changes include:
- Renaming of variables, structs, and functions
- Updating method receivers
- Modifying event-related code
The renaming is consistent throughout the file and maintains the correct functionality of the contract bindings. No functional changes were made; the modifications are purely for naming consistency.
Impact and Considerations:
While the changes in this file are straightforward, it's important to ensure that this renaming is applied consistently across the entire project. This may include:
- Updating any import statements in other files that reference this contract
- Modifying any code that interacts with this contract to use the new naming convention
- Updating documentation, comments, and test files to reflect the new naming
To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following command:
This will help identify any places where the renaming might have been missed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" (case-sensitive) in Go files rg --type go "CrossChain"Length of output: 29550
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (37)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (9 hunks)
- app/modules.go (1 hunks)
- contract/ICrosschain.go (30 hunks)
- contract/compile.sh (1 hunks)
- contract/contract.go (1 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol (4 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/bridge/ICrosschain.sol (1 hunks)
- solidity/contracts/test/CrosschainTest.sol (4 hunks)
- tests/contract/CrosschainTest.go (4 hunks)
- tests/precompile_suite.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/bridge_call_out.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_router.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/many_to_one.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/msg_server_router.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/contract.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/contract_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.go (3 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/has_oracle_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/is_oracle_online_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/precompile/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/contract.go (3 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/external_address.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/legacy.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (20 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/msgs_test.go (20 hunks)
- x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1 hunks)
- x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrations.go (2 hunks)
- x/erc20/module.go (3 hunks)
- x/erc20/types/token.go (1 hunks)
- x/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/middleware/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/ibc/middleware/keeper/relay.go (3 hunks)
- x/ibc/middleware/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (91)
x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM: Function name updated correctly.The function name has been updated from
TestCrossChainABItoTestCrosschainABI, which is consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This change maintains the correct camelCase convention for Go test functions.
14-15: LGTM: Test assertions maintained with updated variable name.The test assertions remain unchanged, which is correct as the PR objective was only to rename. The variable name has been consistently updated to
crosschainin these assertions. The test continues to verify the correct number of inputs and outputs for both the method and event, maintaining the integrity of the test.Also applies to: 17-17
x/ibc/middleware/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
18-18: LGTM: Method signature updated to include error handling.The
AfterIBCAckSuccessmethod now returns an error, which allows for better error handling and communication of success/failure.To ensure this change is properly implemented and all callers are updated, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the updated AfterIBCAckSuccess method. # Test 1: Find the implementation of AfterIBCAckSuccess echo "Searching for the implementation of AfterIBCAckSuccess:" rg --type go "func.*AfterIBCAckSuccess.*\) error" # Test 2: Find all calls to AfterIBCAckSuccess echo "Searching for calls to AfterIBCAckSuccess:" rg --type go "AfterIBCAckSuccess\("Make sure to update the implementation of this method to return an error and adjust all callers to handle the returned error appropriately.
15-15: LGTM: Interface renamed for consistency.The renaming of
CrossChainKeepertoCrosschainKeeperimproves naming consistency. This change aligns with the PR objective of standardizing the "crosschain" terminology.To ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Renaming and Method Signature Update Confirmed
The
CrossChainKeeperhas been successfully renamed toCrosschainKeeperthroughout the codebase. Additionally, theAfterIBCAckSuccessmethod now includes an error return type, and all implementations and callers have been appropriately updated to handle the error.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the renaming of CrossChainKeeper to CrosschainKeeper across the codebase. # Test 1: Search for any remaining instances of CrossChainKeeper echo "Searching for remaining instances of CrossChainKeeper:" rg --type go "CrossChainKeeper" # Test 2: Verify the usage of the new CrosschainKeeper echo "Verifying usage of new CrosschainKeeper:" rg --type go "CrosschainKeeper"Length of output: 822
x/ibc/middleware/keeper/keeper.go (3)
Line range hint
1-30: Verify complete renaming across the codebaseWhile the changes in this file are consistent, it's crucial to ensure that the renaming from "cross chain" to "crosschain" has been applied uniformly throughout the entire codebase.
Let's run a comprehensive check for any remaining instances of
CrossChainorcrossChain:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of CrossChain or crossChain in the entire codebase # Test 1: Search for CrossChain (case-sensitive) echo "Searching for 'CrossChain':" rg --type go 'CrossChain' # Test 2: Search for crossChain (case-sensitive) echo "Searching for 'crossChain':" rg --type go 'crossChain'If any instances are found, they may need to be updated for consistency.
15-15: LGTM! Verify corresponding changes in thetypespackage.The renaming of
crossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperis consistent with the PR objective and improves naming consistency.To ensure full consistency, let's verify the corresponding change in the
typespackage:✅ Verification successful
Renaming Verified!
The renaming of
crossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperis consistent across the codebase, including in thetypespackage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the renaming of CrossChainKeeper to CrosschainKeeper in the types package # Test: Search for CrosschainKeeper in the types package rg --type go -g 'x/ibc/middleware/types/*.go' 'type CrosschainKeeper'Length of output: 148
18-22: LGTM! Verify usage ofNewKeeperacross the codebase.The changes in the
NewKeeperfunction are consistent with the renaming in theKeeperstruct. This maintains code consistency and aligns with the PR objective.To ensure that all calls to
NewKeeperhave been updated accordingly, let's run the following verification:✅ Verification successful
LGTM! All instances of
NewKeeperhave been updated to usecrosschainKeeperacross the codebase. No issues found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of NewKeeper with the updated parameter name # Test: Search for NewKeeper calls in the codebase rg --type go 'NewKeeper\s*\([^)]*crossChainKeeper'Length of output: 37402
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all instances of NewKeeper to verify parameter usage # Search for all NewKeeper function calls rg --type go 'NewKeeper\s*\('Length of output: 3461
solidity/contracts/bridge/ICrosschain.sol (5)
10-11: Deprecation notice forcrossChainfunction retainedThe deprecation notice for the
crossChainfunction has been correctly retained in the updated interface. This notice is important as it guides developers to use theIBridgeCall.bridgeCallfunction instead, promoting the use of newer, preferred methods.
Line range hint
12-50: Function declarations remain unchangedThe function declarations in the
ICrosschaininterface have been correctly maintained. This includescrossChain,bridgeCoinAmount,executeClaim,hasOracle, andisOracleOnline. The interface also properly extendsIBridgeCall. These unchanged declarations ensure that existing implementations remain compatible with the renamed interface.
Line range hint
52-80: Event declarations maintained with appropriate deprecationThe event declarations in the
ICrosschaininterface have been correctly maintained. This includesCrossChain,BridgeCallEvent, andExecuteClaimEvent. TheCrossChainevent is appropriately marked as deprecated, which aligns with the deprecation of thecrossChainfunction. This consistency in deprecation helps guide developers towards using the newer events and functions.
Line range hint
1-80: Summary: Consistent renaming with maintained functionalityThe changes in this file successfully implement the renaming of "cross chain" to "crosschain" in the interface name. The following key points summarize the review:
- The interface has been renamed from
ICrossChaintoICrosschain.- Function and event declarations remain unchanged, maintaining compatibility.
- Deprecation notices for the
crossChainfunction andCrossChainevent are retained, guiding developers to newer alternatives.- The interface continues to extend
IBridgeCallcorrectly.These changes improve naming consistency without altering the interface's functionality or breaking existing implementations. The file is well-structured and maintains clear documentation through comments and deprecation notices.
9-9: Interface renamed fromICrossChaintoICrosschainThe interface has been renamed from
ICrossChaintoICrosschain, which is consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This change improves naming consistency across the codebase.To ensure this change is applied consistently throughout the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining instances of
ICrossChainthat might need to be updated for consistency.✅ Verification successful
ICrossChain renaming successfully applied
All instances of
ICrossChainhave been renamed toICrosschainacross the codebase. No remaining occurrences ofICrossChainwere found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'ICrossChain' that might need updating # Search for 'ICrossChain' in all Solidity files echo "Searching for 'ICrossChain' in Solidity files:" rg --type solidity 'ICrossChain' # Search for 'ICrossChain' in all TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Searching for 'ICrossChain' in TypeScript/JavaScript files:" rg --type ts --type js 'ICrossChain' # Search for 'ICrossChain' in all Python files echo "Searching for 'ICrossChain' in Python files:" rg --type python 'ICrossChain'Length of output: 513
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'ICrossChain' that might need updating # Search for 'ICrossChain' in Solidity files echo "Searching for 'ICrossChain' in Solidity files (*.sol):" rg 'ICrossChain' -g '*.sol' # Search for 'ICrossChain' in TypeScript/JavaScript files echo "Searching for 'ICrossChain' in TypeScript/JavaScript files (*.ts, *.js):" rg 'ICrossChain' -g '*.ts' -g '*.js' # Search for 'ICrossChain' in Python files echo "Searching for 'ICrossChain' in Python files (*.py):" rg 'ICrossChain' -g '*.py'Length of output: 645
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for any remaining instances of 'ICrossChain' with case-insensitive matching. # Perform a case-insensitive search for 'ICrossChain' across all files echo "Searching for 'ICrossChain' in all files (case-insensitive):" rg -i 'ICrossChain'Length of output: 20834
x/crosschain/precompile/contract.go (1)
37-37: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The change from
NewCrossChainMethodtoNewCrosschainMethodis consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This change improves naming consistency.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase and doesn't break any existing calls, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies or missed renamings across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Method Renaming Consistent Across Codebase
The renaming from
NewCrossChainMethodtoNewCrosschainMethodhas been successfully applied across the codebase. No instances ofNewCrossChainMethodremain, ensuring consistency and preventing potential breakages.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" and verify all calls to the new method name. # Test 1: Search for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" in Go files echo "Searching for remaining 'CrossChain' instances:" rg --type go 'CrossChain' # Test 2: Verify all calls to the new method name echo "Verifying calls to 'NewCrosschainMethod':" rg --type go 'NewCrosschainMethod' # Test 3: Check for any instances of the old method name that might have been missed echo "Checking for any missed instances of 'NewCrossChainMethod':" rg --type go 'NewCrossChainMethod'Length of output: 30226
contract/compile.sh (2)
Line range hint
1-67: Overall assessment of compile.shThe changes made to rename "cross chain" to "crosschain" in this script are appropriate and align with the PR objectives. The script continues to function as intended, maintaining its core purpose of compiling contracts and generating Ethereum ABI wrapper code.
While the immediate changes are acceptable, there's room for improvement in the script's overall structure and maintainability. The suggestions provided earlier could significantly enhance the script's robustness and ease of maintenance in the long term.
34-35: Naming convention update looks good.The changes from
ICrossChaintoICrosschainandCrossChainTesttoCrosschainTestare consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This standardization improves consistency across the codebase.Let's verify if these changes are consistent across the codebase:
This script will help us identify any instances of the old naming convention that might have been missed, as well as verify the consistent usage of the new "crosschain" naming.
solidity/contracts/test/CrosschainTest.sol (4)
Line range hint
53-59: LGTM. Interface usage updated correctly.The
crossChainfunction has been updated to use the renamedICrosschaininterface. The function parameters and overall logic remain unchanged, ensuring that the functionality is preserved while maintaining consistency with the renaming effort.
68-68: LGTM. Interface usage updated consistently.Both the
bridgeCoinAmountandbridgeCallfunctions have been correctly updated to use the renamedICrosschaininterface. The function parameters and overall logic remain unchanged in both functions, ensuring that the functionality is preserved while maintaining consistency with the renaming effort.Also applies to: 82-90
12-12: LGTM. Verify impact on contract usage.The contract name has been correctly updated from "CrossChainTest" to "CrosschainTest", maintaining consistency with the renaming effort.
To ensure this change doesn't break other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to CrossChainTest in the codebase # Test: Search for old contract name usage. Expect: No results. rg --type solidity '\bCrossChainTest\b' # Test: Search for contract inheritance or instantiation. Expect: Updated references to CrosschainTest. rg --type solidity 'contract.*is.*CrosschainTest|new CrosschainTest'
6-6: LGTM. Verify impact on other files.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the renaming from "ICrossChain" to "ICrosschain". This change is consistent with the overall renaming effort.
To ensure this change doesn't break other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
x/crosschain/types/external_address.go (1)
61-61: LGTM: Consistent terminology updateThe error message has been updated to use "crosschain" instead of "cross chain", which aligns with the PR objective and improves consistency in terminology throughout the codebase.
x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_router.go (1)
17-17: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe comment has been updated from "cross chain keeper" to "crosschain keeper", which aligns with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This change improves consistency in the codebase.
To ensure consistency across the file and potentially the entire codebase, let's run the following script:
tests/precompile_suite.go (2)
53-53: LGTM: Consistent naming convention applied.The renaming of
crossChainContracttocrosschainContractimproves consistency with the new naming convention. The functionality remains unchanged.
Line range hint
1-64: Overall: Consistent renaming applied throughout the file.The changes in this file consistently apply the new naming convention, changing "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This improves consistency across the codebase without altering the functionality. The renaming has been applied correctly to both variable declaration and usage.
x/ibc/middleware/keeper/relay.go (4)
60-60: LGTM! Consistent with the renaming objective.The change from
k.crossChainKeeper.AfterIBCAckSuccesstok.crosschainKeeper.AfterIBCAckSuccessaligns with the PR's goal of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This maintains consistency with the previous change and improves overall codebase coherence.
Line range hint
1-84: Summary: Consistent renaming improves code coherenceThe changes in this file successfully implement the renaming of
crossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperacross multiple methods. This renaming:
- Improves naming consistency throughout the codebase.
- Aligns with the PR objective of standardizing "cross chain" to "crosschain".
- Maintains the existing functionality without introducing any logical changes.
These updates contribute to better code readability and maintenance. Ensure that this renaming is consistently applied across the entire project, including any related documentation or comments.
84-84: LGTM! Verify the interface/struct definition for crosschainKeeper.The change from
k.crossChainKeeper.IBCCoinRefundtok.crosschainKeeper.IBCCoinRefundis consistent with the previous changes and the PR's renaming objective. This completes the renaming process within this file.To ensure the complete implementation of this change, please run the following script to verify the interface or struct definition for crosschainKeeper:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the interface/struct definition for crosschainKeeper # Test: Search for the crosschainKeeper definition echo "Searching for crosschainKeeper definition:" rg --type go -A 10 'type.*crosschainKeeper'This will help confirm that the renaming has been applied to the keeper's definition as well.
39-39: LGTM! Verify consistent renaming across the codebase.The change from
k.crossChainKeeper.IBCCoinToEvmtok.crosschainKeeper.IBCCoinToEvmis consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This improves naming consistency in the codebase.To ensure this renaming has been applied consistently throughout the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Consistent renaming verified across the codebase.
The renaming of
crossChainKeepertocrosschainKeeperhas been successfully applied throughout the codebase, ensuring naming consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent renaming of crossChainKeeper to crosschainKeeper # Test 1: Check for any remaining instances of crossChainKeeper echo "Checking for remaining instances of crossChainKeeper:" rg --type go 'crossChainKeeper' # Test 2: Verify the usage of the new crosschainKeeper echo "Verifying usage of new crosschainKeeper:" rg --type go 'crosschainKeeper'Length of output: 876
solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol (5)
39-39: Approve function parameter update.The
initializefunction parameter has been correctly renamed from_crossChainto_crosschain, maintaining consistency with the PR objective and previous changes. The internal logic of the function remains unchanged.
23-23: Approve variable renaming and verify usage.The public variable has been correctly renamed from
crossChainContracttocrosschainContract, maintaining consistency with the PR objective.To ensure all references to this variable within the contract have been updated, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old variable name # Test: Search for any remaining crossChainContract references in this file rg --type solidity 'crossChainContract' solidity/contracts/bridge/BridgeFeeOracle.sol
56-60: Approve method call updates and verify interface compatibility.The method calls within the
isOnlinefunction have been correctly updated to useICrosschaininstead ofICrossChain, and the variable name has been updated tocrosschainContract. These changes are consistent with the PR objective and previous modifications in the file.To ensure full compatibility, please run the following script to verify that the
ICrosschaininterface includes thehasOracleandisOracleOnlinemethods with the correct signatures:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ICrosschain interface methods # Test: Check for the presence of hasOracle and isOracleOnline methods in ICrosschain ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern $'interface ICrosschain { $$$ function hasOracle($_, $_) $_ $$$ function isOracleOnline($_, $_) $_ $$$ }'
Line range hint
1-101: Summary of changes and global verification suggestion.The changes in this file consistently rename "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" throughout the contract, including import statements, variable names, and method calls. These modifications align with the PR objective and appear to be implemented correctly without altering the contract's functionality.
To ensure consistency across the entire codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent renaming across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining "CrossChain" instances (case-sensitive) echo "Checking for remaining 'CrossChain' instances:" rg --type solidity 'CrossChain' # Test 2: Verify that all "Crosschain" instances are lowercase after "cross" echo "Verifying 'Crosschain' capitalization:" rg --type solidity 'Crosschain' # Test 3: Check for any inconsistencies in variable naming echo "Checking for inconsistent variable naming:" rg --type solidity 'crossChain|crossChain'This script will help identify any remaining instances of "CrossChain" that may have been missed, ensure consistent capitalization of "Crosschain", and catch any inconsistencies in variable naming conventions.
10-10: Approve import statement change and verify impact.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the renaming from
ICrossChaintoICrosschain. This change is consistent with the PR objective.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old import:
✅ Verification successful
Import statement change verified successfully.
All references to
ICrossChainhave been updated toICrosschain. No remaining instances ofICrossChainfound.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old ICrossChain import # Test: Search for any remaining ICrossChain references rg --type solidity 'import.*ICrossChain'Length of output: 504
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old ICrossChain import in .sol files # Test: Search for any remaining ICrossChain references within Solidity (.sol) files rg 'import\s+\{ICrossChain\}' --type-add 'sol=**/*.sol' --type solLength of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old ICrossChain import in .sol files echo "Checking for remaining 'ICrossChain' import references in .sol files:" # Corrected type definition using colon rg 'import\s+\{ICrossChain\}' --type-add 'sol:*.sol' --type solLength of output: 220
x/crosschain/types/contract.go (3)
14-15: LGTM: Consistent renaming of variablesThe renaming of
crossChainAddresstocrosschainAddressandcrossChainABItocrosschainABIis consistent with the PR objective and maintains the camelCase naming convention. The functionality remains unchanged.
19-19: LGTM: Consistent updates to return statementsThe return statements in
GetAddress()andGetABI()have been correctly updated to use the renamed variablescrosschainAddressandcrosschainABI, respectively. This maintains consistency with the earlier variable renaming while preserving the original functionality.Also applies to: 23-23
Line range hint
1-180: Summary: Consistent renaming improves code clarityThe changes in this file successfully implement the renaming of "cross chain" to "crosschain" across variables, structs, and methods. This improves consistency in the codebase without altering any functionality. The changes are well-executed and maintain the existing code structure and naming conventions.
Key points:
- Variables
crossChainAddressandcrossChainABIhave been renamed.- Return statements in
GetAddress()andGetABI()have been updated accordingly.- The
CrossChainArgsstruct and itsValidate()method have been renamed toCrosschainArgs.These changes enhance code readability and maintain a consistent terminology throughout the file.
x/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.go (6)
35-36: LGTM: Method receivers updated consistently.The renaming of the receiver from
CrossChainMethodtoCrosschainMethodis consistent across these methods. The functionality remains unchanged.Also applies to: 39-41, 43-45
114-116: LGTM: Method renamed consistently.The
NewCrosschainEventmethod has been renamed consistently with the PR objective. The functionality remains unchanged.
118-124: LGTM: Argument type renamed consistently.The
UnpackInputmethod has been updated to useCrosschainArgsinstead ofCrossChainArgs, which is consistent with the PR objective. The functionality remains unchanged.
126-132: LGTM: Argument type renamed consistently.The
PackInputmethod has been updated to useCrosschainArgsinstead ofCrossChainArgs, which is consistent with the PR objective. The functionality remains unchanged.
134-136: LGTM: No functional changes.The
PackOutputmethod remains unchanged except for the consistent renaming of the receiver type. The functionality is preserved.
Line range hint
1-136: Summary: Consistent renaming with suggestions for improvementThe changes in this file successfully implement the renaming from
CrossChaintoCrosschain, which is consistent with the PR objective. All occurrences have been updated correctly, maintaining the overall functionality of the code.Key points:
- Deprecation notices have been added, but could be enhanced with more context.
- The
Runmethod, while functionally unchanged, is complex and could benefit from refactoring for improved maintainability.Overall, the changes achieve the intended goal of the PR. Consider addressing the suggestions in future updates to further improve the codebase.
x/erc20/module.go (3)
84-84: Approved: Consistent naming convention appliedThe renaming of
crossChainKeeperstocrosschainKeepersimproves consistency with the module import aliascrosschainkeeperused in the file. This change aligns with the apparent standardization of "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" across the codebase.
95-95: Approved: Consistent parameter namingThe update of the
cksparameter in theNewAppModulefunction maintains consistency with the renamed field in theAppModulestruct. This change ensures that the function signature remains aligned with the struct definition, preserving the module's integrity.
Line range hint
84-95: Verify consistent naming across the codebaseThe changes in this file appear to be part of a larger effort to standardize the naming convention from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". While the changes here are correct and consistent, it's important to ensure this naming convention is applied uniformly across the entire codebase.
To verify the consistency of this naming change across the codebase, you can run the following script:
x/crosschain/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
131-131: LGTM: Consistent renaming applied.The change from
CrossChainParamstoCrosschainParamsis consistent with the overall renaming effort. The function call has been correctly updated, maintaining the functionality while improving naming consistency.
Line range hint
1-161: Overall: Consistent renaming applied throughout the file.The changes in this file successfully implement the renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". The updates are consistent and do not alter the functionality of the test suite. The renaming effort improves the overall consistency of the codebase.
x/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call_test.go (1)
141-141: LGTM. Consistent with previous change.This change aligns with the renaming from
ICrossChainBridgeCallEventtoICrosschainBridgeCallEvent, maintaining consistency within the file.x/crosschain/precompile/contract_test.go (1)
59-61: LGTM: Consistent renaming improves code clarityThe changes in this segment are part of the broader effort to rename "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" throughout the codebase. This improves consistency and makes the code more uniform. The functionality remains unchanged, which is good.
app/modules.go (1)
132-132: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CrossChain to CrosschainThe change from
app.CrossChainKeeperstoapp.CrosschainKeepersis consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". This modification maintains the functionality while updating the naming convention.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that this renaming has been applied uniformly:
This will help confirm that the renaming has been applied consistently throughout the project.
x/gov/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
Line range hint
314-359: Great addition of comprehensive test cases!The new
TestCheckContractAddressIsDisabledfunction is well-structured and covers a good range of scenarios for theCheckContractAddressIsDisabledfunction. It uses table-driven tests, which is an excellent practice for testing multiple cases efficiently.Some positive observations:
- Clear test case names and descriptions.
- Coverage of edge cases (empty disabled list, specific method disabling).
- Proper error message checking.
- Use of
requireassertions for clear test failures.This addition significantly improves the test coverage for the contract address disabling functionality.
Line range hint
260-264: LGTM! Verify corresponding changes in implementation.The test case has been updated to reflect the renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain", which is consistent with the PR objectives. The addition of the
ChainNamefield in theMsgUpdateParamsstruct is noted.Please ensure that these changes are consistent with the actual implementation of the
MsgUpdateParamsstruct in the crosschain module. Run the following command to verify:✅ Verification successful
Verified: The changes in the
TestUpdateParamstest case correctly reflect the updatedMsgUpdateParamsstruct in the crosschain module. All necessary fields are appropriately set, and the renaming is consistent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the MsgUpdateParams struct in the crosschain module rg --type go 'type MsgUpdateParams struct' -A 10 -g 'x/crosschain/types/*.go'Length of output: 924
tests/contract/CrosschainTest.go (5)
32-33: LGTM: Consistent renaming of metadata and ABI variablesThe changes to variable names and comments are consistent with the renaming from "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". This maintains coherence throughout the generated binding.
Also applies to: 38-40, 42-44
63-67: LGTM: Consistent renaming of main struct and its componentsThe renaming of the main
CrosschainTeststruct and its components (Caller, Transactor, Filterer) is consistent and maintains the expected structure of the generated binding.Also applies to: 70-71, 75-76, 80-81
85-91: LGTM: Consistent renaming of session structsThe renaming of session structs (CrosschainTestSession, CrosschainTestCallerSession, CrosschainTestTransactorSession) is consistent with the overall renaming pattern and maintains the expected structure of the generated binding.
Also applies to: 93-97, 100-104
107-119: LGTM: Consistent renaming of raw binding structs and methodsThe renaming of raw binding structs (CrosschainTestRaw, CrosschainTestCallerRaw, CrosschainTestTransactorRaw) and their associated methods is consistent with the overall renaming pattern. The functionality of these low-level bindings remains unchanged.
Also applies to: 171-202
Line range hint
1-285: Summary: Consistent renaming with minor suggestionThe changes in this file consistently rename "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" throughout the generated Go binding. This includes updates to struct names, method names, and comments. The changes maintain the functionality of the binding while updating the naming convention.
A minor suggestion was made to update the "CROSSCHAINADDRESS" method name to follow Go naming conventions.
Overall, these changes improve the consistency of the codebase and should not introduce any functional changes.
app/keepers/keepers.go (6)
Line range hint
91-107: LGTM: Consistent renaming of CrossChain to CrosschainThe changes in this segment are consistent with the overall goal of renaming "CrossChain" to "Crosschain". The struct and method have been updated correctly, maintaining the same functionality.
143-143: LGTM: Consistent field renaming in AppKeepers structThe field
CrossChainKeepershas been correctly renamed toCrosschainKeepersin theAppKeepersstruct, maintaining consistency with the overall renaming effort.
Line range hint
332-348: LGTM: Improved clarity with crosschain precompile router renamingThe renaming of
precompileRoutertocrosschainPrecompileRouterenhances code clarity by explicitly indicating its purpose. The initialization and usage have been updated consistently throughout the code. This change improves readability without altering the functionality.Also applies to: 510-520
Line range hint
374-509: LGTM: Consistent terminology update in crosschain module initializationThe changes in this segment are limited to updating comments from "cross chain" to "crosschain", maintaining consistency with the overall renaming effort. The core functionality of the crosschain module initialization remains intact.
Line range hint
1-633: Summary: Consistent renaming and minor structural changesThis review has covered all significant changes in the
app/keepers/keepers.gofile. The modifications primarily involve renaming "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" across various structs, methods, and variables. These changes are consistent and improve the overall terminology standardization in the codebase.Key points:
- The
CrosschainKeepersstruct and related methods have been updated.- The
AppKeepersstruct field has been renamed accordingly.- The crosschain precompile router has been renamed for better clarity.
- Comments in the crosschain module initialization have been updated.
- The
IBCMiddlewareKeeperinitialization has been relocated.No functional changes or potential issues were identified during this review. The changes appear to be part of a broader effort to improve code consistency and clarity.
554-554: LGTM: IBCMiddlewareKeeper initialization relocatedThe IBCMiddlewareKeeper initialization has been moved to this location. While this change doesn't affect functionality, it's worth verifying that this relocation is intentional and doesn't break any initialization order dependencies.
To ensure this relocation doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Verified: IBCMiddlewareKeeper initialization relocation confirmed
The relocation of the
IBCMiddlewareKeeperinitialization has been verified. No references toIBCMiddlewareKeeperare found before its initialization, ensuring that the relocation does not disrupt initialization order dependencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization order of keepers # Test: Check if there are any references to IBCMiddlewareKeeper before its initialization rg -B 10 -A 2 "IBCMiddlewareKeeper" app/keepers/keepers.goLength of output: 1290
x/crosschain/types/msgs.go (11)
17-18: Consistent renaming of CrossChainMsg interfaceThe renaming of
CrossChainMsgtoCrosschainMsgis consistent with the overall effort to standardize the naming convention. This change improves code consistency and readability.
24-43: Thorough update of CrosschainMsg type assertionsAll type assertions have been correctly updated to use the new
CrosschainMsginterface name. This demonstrates a thorough approach to maintaining consistency throughout the codebase.
96-96: Consistent error message updates across multiple functionsThe error message "unrecognized crosschain name" has been consistently updated across multiple functions. This maintains consistency throughout the codebase.
As suggested in the comment for line 74, consider improving these error messages by including the specific chain name in the error message for easier debugging.
Also applies to: 109-109, 122-122, 138-138, 148-148, 171-171
190-190: Consistent error message update in MsgSendToExternalThe error message has been consistently updated in the
MsgSendToExternal.ValidateBasic()method.As suggested in previous comments, consider improving this error message by including the specific chain name for easier debugging.
212-212: Consistent error message update in MsgConfirmBatchThe error message has been consistently updated in the
MsgConfirmBatch.ValidateBasic()method.As suggested in previous comments, consider improving this error message by including the specific chain name for easier debugging.
234-234: Consistent error message update in MsgBridgeCallConfirmThe error message has been consistently updated in the
MsgBridgeCallConfirm.ValidateBasic()method.As suggested in previous comments, consider improving this error message by including the specific chain name for easier debugging.
293-293: Consistent error message update in MsgClaimThe error message has been consistently updated in the
MsgClaim.ValidateBasic()method.As suggested in previous comments, consider improving this error message by including the specific chain name for easier debugging.
319-319: Consistent error message update in MsgSendToFxClaimThe error message has been consistently updated in the
MsgSendToFxClaim.ValidateBasic()method.As suggested in previous comments, consider improving this error message by including the specific chain name for easier debugging.
363-363: Consistent error message updates across multiple claim typesThe error message "unrecognized crosschain name" has been consistently updated across various claim types including
MsgBridgeCallClaim,MsgBridgeCallResultClaim,MsgSendToExternalClaim,MsgBridgeTokenClaim, andMsgOracleSetUpdatedClaim. This demonstrates a thorough and consistent approach to the renaming effort.As suggested in previous comments, consider improving these error messages by including the specific chain name in each error message for easier debugging.
Also applies to: 484-484, 528-528, 559-559, 604-604
643-643: Comprehensive error message updates including parameter update messagesThe error message "unrecognized crosschain name" has been consistently updated in
MsgUpdateParams.ValidateBasic()andMsgUpdateChainOracles.ValidateBasic()methods. This completes a thorough update across all relevant structs in the file.As suggested in previous comments, consider improving these error messages by including the specific chain name in each error message for easier debugging.
Also applies to: 659-659
Line range hint
1-659: Comprehensive and consistent renaming of CrossChain to CrosschainThis pull request demonstrates a thorough and consistent effort to rename "CrossChain" to "Crosschain" throughout the
msgs.gofile. The changes include:
- Updating the
CrosschainMsginterface name and all its implementations.- Modifying error messages across all relevant structs and methods.
The renaming improves code consistency and readability. However, there's an opportunity to enhance error messages by including specific chain names for easier debugging, as suggested in previous comments.
Overall, this is a well-executed refactoring that maintains the existing functionality while improving code consistency.
contract/contract.go (3)
Line range hint
1-10: LGTM: Package and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are well-structured and relevant for a contract-related file. All imported packages seem to be utilized in the code.
Line range hint
20-41: LGTM: Variable declarations are well-structured.The variable declarations for contracts and ABIs are appropriate and well-organized. The use of
MustDecodeHexandMustABIJsonfunctions ensures that the initialization is correct or the program will panic, which is suitable for critical contract data.
Line range hint
12-18: Verify the impact of renaming CrosschainAddress.The renaming of
CrossChainAddresstoCrosschainAddressis consistent with the PR objective. This change improves naming consistency.Let's verify if this constant is used elsewhere in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Renaming of
CrossChainAddresstoCrosschainAddresshas been successfully applied across the codebase with no remaining references to the old name.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for uses of CrosschainAddress rg --type go "CrosschainAddress"Length of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for uses of the old constant name CrossChainAddress rg --type go "CrossChainAddress"Length of output: 32
contract/ICrosschain.go (3)
32-33: Consistent renaming of metadata and ABI variables.The variables
ICrosschainMetaDataandICrosschainABIhave been correctly renamed from their previous "CrossChain" versions. The deprecation notice forICrosschainABIhas also been updated accordingly.Also applies to: 37-39
41-45: Consistent renaming of struct definitions.All struct definitions related to the Crosschain contract have been correctly updated:
- Main struct
ICrosschainand its fieldsICrosschainCaller,ICrosschainTransactor, andICrosschainFilterer- Session structs:
ICrosschainSession,ICrosschainCallerSession, andICrosschainTransactorSession- Raw structs:
ICrosschainRaw,ICrosschainCallerRaw, andICrosschainTransactorRawThe renaming is consistent and maintains the correct relationships between the structs.
Also applies to: 48-49, 53-54, 58-59, 65-69, 73-74, 80-82, 85-87, 90-92, 95-97
339-341: Consistent update of event-related code.All event-related code for the Crosschain contract has been correctly renamed and updated:
- BridgeCallEvent: iterator, parsing, and event struct
- CrossChain event: iterator, parsing, and event struct
- ExecuteClaimEvent: iterator, parsing, and event struct
The renaming is consistent and maintains the correct functionality for event handling and logging.
Also applies to: 355-364, 395-401, 406-420, 509-511, 525-534, 565-571, 576-590, 668-670, 684-693, 724-730, 735-743
x/crosschain/types/msgs_test.go (11)
51-51: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" align with the PR's objective of standardizing terminology across the codebase. This update enhances consistency in naming conventions.
Also applies to: 60-60
208-208: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgAddDelegate_ValidateBasic are consistent with the previous modifications and align with the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 217-217
304-304: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgOracleSetConfirm_ValidateBasic maintain consistency with previous modifications and continue to align with the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 313-313
436-436: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgOracleSetUpdatedClaim_ValidateBasic maintain the consistency observed throughout the file and align with the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 445-445
621-621: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgBridgeTokenClaim_ValidateBasic continue the pattern of consistent updates throughout the file, aligning with the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 630-630
816-816: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgSendToFxClaim_ValidateBasic maintain the consistency observed in previous test functions, furthering the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 825-825
1039-1039: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgSendToExternal_ValidateBasic continue the pattern of consistent updates throughout the file, aligning with the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 1048-1048
1173-1173: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgSendToExternalClaim_ValidateBasic maintain the consistency observed in previous test functions, furthering the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 1182-1182
1309-1309: Approved: Consistent terminology updateThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestMsgConfirmBatch_ValidateBasic continue the pattern of consistent updates throughout the file, aligning with the PR's objective of standardizing terminology.
Also applies to: 1318-1318
1470-1470: Approved: Consistent terminology update and completion of standardizationThe changes in error messages from "cross chain" to "crosschain" in TestUpdateChainOraclesProposal_ValidateBasic and TestMsgBridgeCallConfirm_ValidateBasic complete the standardization of terminology across all relevant test functions in this file. These modifications maintain consistency and fulfill the PR's objective of unifying the naming convention.
Overall, these changes enhance the codebase's consistency and readability by using a standardized term "crosschain" throughout the error messages in various test functions.
Also applies to: 1564-1564
Line range hint
1-1700: Summary: Successful standardization of terminologyThis PR successfully standardizes the terminology from "cross chain" to "crosschain" across all relevant test functions in the
x/crosschain/types/msgs_test.gofile. The changes are consistent throughout the file and align with the PR's objective of unifying the naming convention. These modifications enhance the codebase's consistency and readability.Key points:
- All error messages for unrecognized chain names have been updated.
- The changes are applied consistently across multiple test functions.
- No issues or potential improvements were identified during the review.
The standardization of terminology will make the codebase more maintainable and easier to understand for developers working on the project.
x/crosschain/keeper/many_to_one.go (1)
161-163: Ensure callers ofAfterIBCAckSuccesshandle the new error return valueThe function
AfterIBCAckSuccessnow returns anerror. It's important to verify that all callers of this method are updated to handle the returned error appropriately to prevent potential runtime issues.Run the following script to identify calls to
AfterIBCAckSuccessand check if the returned error is handled:✅ Verification successful
: All callers of
AfterIBCAckSuccesshandle the returned error appropriately.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all calls to `AfterIBCAckSuccess` handle the returned error. # Search for all calls to `AfterIBCAckSuccess` in Go files with context. rg --type go 'AfterIBCAckSuccess\(' -A 2Length of output: 740
| @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ type BankKeeper interface { | |||
| type CrosschainKeeper interface { | |||
| ExecuteClaim(ctx sdk.Context, eventNonce uint64) error | |||
| BridgeCoinSupply(ctx context.Context, token, target string) (sdk.Coin, error) | |||
| CrossChainBaseCoin(ctx sdk.Context, from sdk.AccAddress, receipt string, amount, fee sdk.Coin, fxTarget *crosschaintypes.FxTarget, memo string, originToken bool) error | |||
| CrosschainBaseCoin(ctx sdk.Context, from sdk.AccAddress, receipt string, amount, fee sdk.Coin, fxTarget *crosschaintypes.FxTarget, memo string, originToken bool) error | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete renaming of CrossChainBaseCoin detected.
The method CrossChainBaseCoin has been renamed to CrosschainBaseCoin in x/crosschain/precompile/expected_keepers.go. However, instances of CrossChainBaseCoin still exist in the following files:
x/crosschain/keeper/bridge_call_out.gox/crosschain/precompile/crosschain.go
Please update these occurrences to ensure consistent naming across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve the renaming of CrossChainBaseCoin to CrosschainBaseCoin.
The change from CrossChainBaseCoin to CrosschainBaseCoin is consistent with the standardization of naming conventions. This improves code consistency and readability.
To ensure this change is applied consistently across the codebase, please run the following script:
This will help identify any places where the renaming might have been missed or where the new name is used, ensuring consistency across the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'CrossChainBaseCoin' and verify all occurrences of 'CrosschainBaseCoin'
echo "Checking for any remaining instances of 'CrossChainBaseCoin':"
rg --type go 'CrossChainBaseCoin'
echo "Verifying all occurrences of 'CrosschainBaseCoin':"
rg --type go 'CrosschainBaseCoin'
Length of output: 731
| @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import ( | |||
| ethtypes "github.com/functionx/fx-core/v8/x/eth/types" | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| func TestCrossChainHasOracleABI(t *testing.T) { | |||
| func TestCrosschainHasOracleABI(t *testing.T) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent "CrossChain" Naming Detected
Multiple instances of "CrossChain" still exist in the codebase. Please update all occurrences to "Crosschain" to ensure consistent naming throughout the project.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.
The function name change from TestCrossChainHasOracleABI to TestCrosschainHasOracleABI is consistent with the PR objective of renaming "cross chain" to "crosschain". The function logic remains unchanged.
Let's verify if this naming convention is applied consistently across the codebase:
This script will help us identify any inconsistencies in the naming convention across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" or "cross chain" in the codebase.
# Test 1: Search for "CrossChain" (case-sensitive)
echo "Searching for 'CrossChain':"
rg --type go "CrossChain"
# Test 2: Search for "cross chain" (case-insensitive)
echo "Searching for 'cross chain':"
rg --type go -i "cross chain"
# Test 3: Verify the new "Crosschain" naming is used consistently
echo "Verifying 'Crosschain' usage:"
rg --type go "Crosschain"
Length of output: 74964
|
|
||
| beforeBalanceOf := suite.BalanceOf(token, common.BytesToAddress(privateKey.PubKey().Address().Bytes())) | ||
| pack, err := crosschaintypes.GetABI().Pack("crossChain", token, recipient, amount, fee, fxtypes.MustStrToByte32(target), "") | ||
| suite.Require().NoError(err) | ||
| ethTx, err := client.BuildEthTransaction(suite.ctx, suite.EthClient(), privateKey, &crossChainContract, nil, pack) | ||
| ethTx, err := client.BuildEthTransaction(suite.ctx, suite.EthClient(), privateKey, &crosschainContract, nil, pack) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent Naming of CrossChain Functions
The renaming of crosschainContract is consistent; however, the functions TransferCrossChain and CrossChainAndResponse still use CrossChain. For uniformity and clarity, please rename these functions to use crosschain.
TransferCrossChainintests/precompile_suite.goCrossChainAndResponseintests/precompile_suite.go
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Consistent use of renamed variable.
The use of crosschainContract in the client.BuildEthTransaction function call is consistent with the earlier renaming. This ensures that the change is applied uniformly throughout the function.
To ensure the renaming is consistent across the entire file, let's run the following verification:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent use of 'crosschain' instead of 'cross chain' or 'CrossChain'
# Test 1: Check for any remaining instances of 'cross chain' (case-insensitive)
echo "Checking for 'cross chain':"
rg -i 'cross chain' tests/precompile_suite.go
# Test 2: Check for any remaining instances of 'CrossChain'
echo "Checking for 'CrossChain':"
rg 'CrossChain' tests/precompile_suite.go
# Test 3: Verify correct usage of 'crosschain'
echo "Verifying 'crosschain' usage:"
rg 'crosschain' tests/precompile_suite.go
Length of output: 1234
| @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ func (m Migrator) addBridgeToken( | |||
| if getExcludeBridgeToken(ctx, alias) { | |||
| return nil | |||
| } | |||
| for _, ck := range m.crossChainKeepers { | |||
| for _, ck := range m.crosschainKeepers { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining Instances of "cross chain" Found
The script identified the following instances where "cross chain" is still present:
solidity/tasks/bridge_tasks.ts:.addParam("chainName", "init cross chain name", undefined, string, false)solidity/contracts/bridge/FxBridgeLogicETH.sol:* Compatible with cross chain interfaces
Please update these instances to "crosschain" to maintain naming consistency across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistent renaming across the codebase.
The renaming of crossChainKeepers to crosschainKeepers is consistent with the PR objective. The change doesn't affect the logic or functionality of the code.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check for any remaining instances of "cross chain" that might need renaming:
If the script returns any results, consider updating those instances to maintain consistency throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for remaining instances of "cross chain" in the codebase
# Test: Search for "cross chain" (case-insensitive) in all files, excluding markdown files
rg -i "cross chain" --type-not md
Length of output: 236
| @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ func (s *KeeperMockSuite) SetupSubTest() { | |||
| s.SetupTest() | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| func (s *KeeperMockSuite) CrossChainParams() types.Params { | |||
| func (s *KeeperMockSuite) CrosschainParams() types.Params { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Inconsistent usage of "CrossChain" in test files.
-
tests/integration_test.go:suite.CrossChainTest()func (suite *IntegrationTest) GetCrossChainByName(chainName string) CrosschainTestSuite {
-
tests/crosschain_test.go:func (suite *IntegrationTest) CrossChainTest() {
Please update these instances to "Crosschain" to ensure consistency across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Method signature consistently updated.
The method signature has been correctly updated from CrossChainParams to CrosschainParams, aligning with the renaming effort. The internal logic remains unchanged, preserving the functionality.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that all occurrences of "CrossChain" have been updated:
This script will help identify any missed occurrences of "CrossChain" and confirm the consistent use of "Crosschain" throughout the codebase.
LGTM: Method signature consistently updated.
The method signature has been correctly updated from CrossChainParams to CrosschainParams, aligning with the renaming effort. The internal logic remains unchanged, preserving the functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" in the codebase
# Test 1: Search for "CrossChain" in all Go files
echo "Searching for 'CrossChain' in Go files:"
rg --type go 'CrossChain' -g '!*_test.go'
# Test 2: Search for "Crosschain" to confirm the new naming convention
echo "Confirming 'Crosschain' usage in Go files:"
rg --type go 'Crosschain' -g '!*_test.go'
# Test 3: Check for any inconsistencies in test files
echo "Checking for inconsistencies in test files:"
rg --type go 'CrossChain(?!Params)' -g '*_test.go'
Length of output: 72967
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-check for any remaining instances of "CrossChain" in test files excluding "CrossChainParams"
# Test 3 Alternative: Check for "CrossChain" in test files but exclude lines containing "CrossChainParams"
echo "Checking for inconsistencies in test files without using look-around:"
rg --type go 'CrossChain' -g '*_test.go' | grep -v 'CrossChainParams'
Length of output: 456
| @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ func TestContract_BridgeCall_Event(t *testing.T) { | |||
| } | |||
| inputs := bridgeCall.Event.Inputs | |||
|
|
|||
| args := contract.ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent{ | |||
| args := contract.ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent{ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete Renaming Detected
The renaming from ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent to ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent has not been fully applied across the codebase. The following files still contain instances of the old identifier:
contract/ICrosschain.gox/crosschain/precompile/bridge_call_test.go
Please update these instances to ensure consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM. Verify consistency across the codebase.
The renaming from ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent to ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent is consistent with the standardization effort mentioned in the PR summary.
To ensure consistency, please run the following command to check for any remaining instances of ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent in the codebase:
If any results are returned, they should be updated to maintain consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent
rg --type go "ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent"
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent and ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent
rg --type go "ICrossChainBridgeCallEvent"
rg --type go "ICrosschainBridgeCallEvent"
Length of output: 2176
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AfterIBCAckSuccessmethod to return error values.Bug Fixes
Refactor
CrossChaintoCrosschain) for consistency in naming conventions across the codebase.Tests