chore: migrate bridge balances #760
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several key changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on the integration of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1)
24-26: Approved: Improved token processing logicThe changes to the
MigrateTokenfunction enhance the token processing logic by:
- Moving the
baseDenomcalculation earlier for consistent application.- Adding special handling for the "PUNDIX" token.
- Broadening the criteria for including the "pundix/purse" token.
These modifications appear to address specific token requirements effectively.
Consider adding a comment explaining the special handling for "PUNDIX" and the broadened criteria for "pundix/purse" to improve code clarity:
baseDenom := strings.ToLower(md.Symbol) +// Special handling for PUNDIX token and broadened criteria for pundix/purse // exclude FX and alias empty, except PUNDIX if md.Base == fxtypes.DefaultDenom || (len(md.DenomUnits) == 0 || len(md.DenomUnits[0].Aliases) == 0) && md.Symbol != "PUNDIX" { continue } // ... // only add pundix/purse token if md.Base == baseDenom || strings.Contains(md.Base, baseDenom) { continue }Also applies to: 35-36
x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
85-85: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
GetModuleAccountmethod to theAccountKeeperinterface is a good enhancement. It provides a way to retrieve module-specific accounts, which is useful for various operations in the Cosmos SDK ecosystem.Consider adding a brief comment above the method to describe its purpose and any potential usage constraints. For example:
// GetModuleAccount retrieves the module account for the given module name. // Returns nil if the module account doesn't exist. GetModuleAccount(ctx context.Context, moduleName string) sdk.ModuleAccountIx/erc20/migrations/v8/token.go (2)
11-12: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the "pundix" entry to the
testnetIBCDenomTracemap looks good. It follows the existing structure and appears to be correctly implemented.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why "pundix" uses channel-0, as it differs from other entries in the map. This would improve code readability and maintainability.
26-27: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for consistency.The addition of the "pundix" entry to the
mainnetIBCDenomTracemap is correct and consistent with the testnet implementation.For consistency with the suggested improvement in the testnet map, consider adding a brief comment explaining the use of channel-0 for "pundix" in the mainnet context as well.
x/crosschain/keeper/genesis.go (1)
20-20: LGTM: Update to use BridgeCallSenderThe change to use
types.BridgeCallSenderfor thecrosschainBridgeCallFromaddress is correct and aligns with changes in other parts of the codebase.Consider adding a comment to explain the significance of using
BridgeCallSender:// Use BridgeCallSender as the module address for cross-chain bridge calls crosschainBridgeCallFrom := autytypes.NewModuleAddress(types.BridgeCallSender)x/crosschain/types/key.go (1)
16-16: Add a descriptive comment for the new constant.The new constant
BridgeCallSenderhas been added correctly. However, to improve code documentation and maintainability, consider adding a brief comment explaining its purpose and usage.For example:
// BridgeCallSender is the module name used for bridge call operations BridgeCallSender = "bridgecall"app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go (2)
151-151: Address the pending migration of bridge and IBC token balancesA TODO comment notes that the migration of bridge token and IBC token balances to the crosschain module is pending. This migration is crucial for ensuring all balances are correctly handled during the upgrade.
Do you want assistance in implementing this migration step or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
167-167: Enhance logging for better traceabilityWhen logging the migration of coins, include additional context such as the transaction hash or a unique identifier. This will aid in troubleshooting if issues arise during the migration process.
Apply this diff to enhance logging:
ctx.Logger().Info("migrate coin", "address", address.String(), "src-denom", srcBase, "dst-denom", dstBase, "amount", coin.Amount.String()) +// Optionally include more context +ctx.Logger().Info("migrate coin", "address", address.String(), "src-denom", srcBase, "dst-denom", dstBase, "amount", coin.Amount.String(), "tx-hash", ctx.TxBytes())
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- app/modules.go (2 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go (4 hunks)
- client/client_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/mock/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/crosschain/types/key.go (1 hunks)
- x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1 hunks)
- x/erc20/migrations/v8/token.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (14)
x/erc20/migrations/v8/migrate.go (1)
24-26: Verify the impact on the overall migration processThe changes to the token processing logic in
MigrateTokenfunction seem to align with the PR objectives of migrating bridge balances. However, it's important to ensure that these modifications don't have unintended consequences on the overall migration process.Please run the following script to check for any potential issues:
This script will help identify any potential areas that might be affected by the changes in the token migration logic.
Also applies to: 35-36
x/erc20/migrations/v8/token.go (1)
Line range hint
1-94: Summary: "pundix" token integration looks good.The additions of "pundix" entries to both
testnetIBCDenomTraceandmainnetIBCDenomTracemaps are correctly implemented and consistent with the existing structure. These changes appear to be part of a larger update involving the "pundix" token, as mentioned in other modified files.The existing functions
getIBCDenomTraceandgetExcludeBridgeTokenremain unchanged, which is appropriate as they don't require modification to support the new entries.To ensure the correct integration of the "pundix" token across the codebase, consider running the following verification script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies or potential issues related to the integration of the "pundix" token across the codebase.
x/crosschain/keeper/genesis.go (2)
Line range hint
1-156: Ensure comprehensive testing for module account changesThe changes in this file, particularly around module account handling, are part of a larger refactoring effort. While the changes themselves are minimal, they could have significant implications for the module's behavior.
Please ensure that comprehensive integration tests are in place to verify:
- The correct initialization of module accounts
- Proper handling of the
BridgeCallSenderaddress- No regression in existing functionality
Consider running the following commands to check for relevant test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for relevant test coverage # Test 1: Look for tests related to InitGenesis in crosschain module rg -A 10 'func.*Test.*InitGenesis' --glob '**/crosschain/**/*_test.go' # Test 2: Check for tests involving BridgeCallSender rg -A 5 'BridgeCallSender' --glob '**/crosschain/**/*_test.go' # Test 3: Look for integration tests that might cover this functionality rg -A 10 'func.*Test.*Integration' --glob '**/crosschain/**/*_test.go'
18-18: Clarify the intention ofGetModuleAccountcallThe
GetModuleAccountmethod is called, but its result is not used or checked. Is this intended to ensure the module account exists? If so, consider adding an error check or using a method that explicitly creates the account if it doesn't exist.✅ Verification successful
Clarify the usage of
GetModuleAccountThe
GetModuleAccountmethod is called to retrieve the module account, and subsequent lines handle account creation if it does not exist. This pattern ensures that the module account is properly initialized without requiring an immediate error check on theGetModuleAccountcall.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there's a create-if-not-exists method for module accounts # Test: Search for methods in the auth keeper that might create module accounts rg -A 5 'func.*Module(Account|Address)' --glob '**/*.go'Length of output: 208
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all usages of GetModuleAccount and examine error handling rg 'GetModuleAccount' --glob '**/*.go' -A 5 # Description: Search for functions related to creating or initializing module accounts rg -e 'CreateModuleAccount' -e 'InitModuleAccount' --glob '**/*.go'Length of output: 6392
app/modules.go (2)
56-56: LGTM: New import for crosschain types added.The new import for
crosschaintypesis correctly formatted and aligns with the subsequent changes in the file.
95-95: LGTM: Crosschain module permissions added. Verify implications.The addition of minting and burning permissions for the crosschain module is consistent with other bridge-like modules. However, as this change could significantly impact token economics, please ensure that:
- The crosschain module's logic properly safeguards these powerful permissions.
- There are appropriate checks and balances in place to prevent misuse.
- The change has been thoroughly tested in a staging environment.
To verify the usage and safeguards of these new permissions, please run the following script:
client/client_test.go (2)
192-192: Verify the reason for increased account sequence numbers.The expected account sequence numbers have been incremented:
- For the first validator's account: from
14+ito15+i- For the Ethereum address: from
17to18These changes suggest an additional transaction or operation is now expected to occur before these checks. Please ensure this aligns with any recent modifications to the transaction processing logic or account initialization process.
To confirm these changes are correct, let's examine the transaction history and account initialization process:
Also applies to: 227-227
✅ Verification successful
Sequence numbers update aligns with new module account addition.
The increase in expected account sequence numbers corresponds to the introduction of thecrosschainmodule account in the recent code changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify transaction history and account initialization # Check for any changes in transaction processing or account initialization rg -p "account.*initialization|transaction.*process" --type go # Look for any recent changes in files related to account or transaction handling git log -p --since="2 weeks ago" -- "**/account*" "**/transaction*" "**/tx*" # Check for any new module accounts that might affect the sequence numbers rg -p "NewModuleAccount|RegisterModuleAccount" --type goLength of output: 362
443-443: Verify the addition of a new module account.The expected number of module accounts has increased from 17 to 18. This change is likely related to the integration of the
crosschaintypespackage and the addition of module account permissions for cross-chain operations, as mentioned in the PR summary.Please ensure that:
- The new module account is properly documented.
- The initialization process for this new account is correctly implemented.
- Any necessary permissions or configurations for the new module account are set up correctly.
Let's confirm the addition of the new module account:
x/crosschain/mock/expected_keepers_mocks.go (3)
687-693: LGTM: New GetModuleAccount method added correctlyThe new
GetModuleAccountmethod has been properly implemented in theMockAccountKeeperstruct. It correctly takes a context and module name as parameters and returns atypes.ModuleAccountI. The implementation uses the mock controller as expected.
695-699: LGTM: GetModuleAccount recorder method added correctlyThe
GetModuleAccountmethod has been properly implemented in theMockAccountKeeperMockRecorderstruct. It correctly takes a context and module name as parameters and returns a*gomock.Call. The implementation uses the mock controller to record the method call as expected.
687-699: Summary: Successful addition of GetModuleAccount functionalityThe changes to this file successfully implement the
GetModuleAccountmethod in both theMockAccountKeeperand its corresponding recorder. This addition aligns with the updates mentioned in the AI-generated summary and enhances the mock implementation to support module account retrieval.These changes likely reflect new functionality in the actual AccountKeeper interface, allowing for better testing and mocking of module account-related operations in the crosschain module.
app/upgrades/v8/upgrade.go (3)
36-38: Verify migration of the crosschain module accountThe
migrateCrosschainModuleAccountfunction is now called during the upgrade process. Please ensure that this migration is thoroughly tested to confirm that the crosschain module account is correctly converted with the appropriate permissions.
56-58: Ensure accurate migration of bridge balancesThe addition of
migrateBridgeBalancehandles the migration of bridge token balances. Verify that all relevant balances are correctly migrated and that edge cases, such as unusual denominations or aliases, are appropriately handled.
187-197: Ensure consistent metadata updates for denomination displayIn the
updateMetadatafunction, when updating the base denomination and display values, ensure that these changes do not conflict with existing IBC prefixes or module names. This prevents potential issues with denomination recognition elsewhere in the system.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AccountKeeperinterface.Bug Fixes
Improvements
Documentation