-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Waypoints for reactions like AX + BY -> AY + BX #14
Comments
Does this belong in this repo, or the PathVisio-Java repo? |
I like to get Ryan's comment too, as he is coordinating the Maastricht interaction work. See also #15 |
See also our Discussions Points doc |
Point can already have a graphId - it's optional at the moment but I guess from a GPML point of view this is already possible. Implementing this in the GUI is another story... Not sure how we would do that. And not sure if it should be in 2017a discussion. We just need to make sure that whatever we would want to have in the GPML to represent those type of interactions actually is possible. So if having a graphId on a point that can be referenced in another Point is enough. |
Anders and I has a productive discussion about this tricky issue (after a lot of coffee) and worked out some really nice features. Then we worked back to what's needed for GPML2017a to support these. We need:
|
@AlexanderPico @ariutta we will plan another meeting about GPML2021. it would be great if we all could have another look at this issue before the meeting. we are stuck with what to do about this. |
@AlexanderPico and I discussed an idea for Interactions as described in the "pathvisiojs and PathVisio-Java Coordination" Google Doc. To better handle reactions of the type AX + BY -> AY + BX, we could add special GPML Anchors or
Waypoints
. If this change is part of GPML2017a, it might mean aPoint
could have aGraphId
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: