Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: remove outdated references to CODEOWNERS #369505

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

me-and
Copy link
Contributor

@me-and me-and commented Dec 30, 2024

As of b01ca00 (CODEOWNERS: Switch to alternate mechanism, 2024-10-10) and #336261, this repository doesn't use the GitHub CODEOWNERS file, but instead has its own similar mechanism. Remove and update references to the CODEOWNERS file in various documentation files.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

As of b01ca00 (CODEOWNERS: Switch to alternate mechanism,
2024-10-10) and NixOS#336261, this repository doesn't use the GitHub
CODEOWNERS file, but instead has its own similar mechanism.  Remove and
update references to the CODEOWNERS file in various documentation files.
@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 6.topic: haskell 6.topic: policy discussion labels Dec 30, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Dec 30, 2024
Comment on lines 24 to +26
For critical packages, this convention needs to be negotiated with the
maintainer. A critical package is one that causes mass-rebuild, or where an
author is listed in the [`CODEOWNERS`](../.github/CODEOWNERS) file.
author is listed in the [`OWNERS`](../ci/OWNERS) file.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this whole paragraph has been wrong for a while. OWNERS is for things that don't have a meta.maintainers as well, that may or may not be critical.

Copy link
Contributor

@SigmaSquadron SigmaSquadron Dec 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But I don't want this to be a blocking comment. We can rewrite it in another PR.

Co-authored-by: Fernando Rodrigues <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@infinisil infinisil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@infinisil infinisil merged commit 7ed1504 into NixOS:master Dec 30, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@me-and me-and deleted the codeowners branch December 31, 2024 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: haskell 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 6.topic: policy discussion 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants