Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Bump nltk from 3.8.1 to 3.8.2" #951

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

mars-lan
Copy link
Contributor

@mars-lan mars-lan commented Aug 16, 2024

Reverts #950

3.8.2 got removed by the author: nltk/nltk#3266 (comment). Reverting this until 3.9 is out.

@mars-lan mars-lan enabled auto-merge (squash) August 16, 2024 12:20
@mars-lan mars-lan requested a review from alyiwang August 16, 2024 12:24
Copy link

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
11787 10472 89% 85% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: 883c80a by action🐍

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.84%. Comparing base (8ce4dbe) to head (883c80a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #951   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.84%   88.84%           
=======================================
  Files         182      182           
  Lines       11787    11787           
=======================================
  Hits        10472    10472           
  Misses       1315     1315           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mars-lan mars-lan merged commit 59c5856 into main Aug 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@mars-lan mars-lan deleted the revert-950-dependabot/pip/nltk-3.8.2 branch August 16, 2024 12:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants