-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modification intitulés pour mieux distinguer réglementations temporaires et permanentes #1069
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b0449ae
change form title
Lealefoulon 115d460
points 10 & 11
Lealefoulon 91c0d94
sup point 5
Lealefoulon 680cbc9
Merge branch 'main' into feat/improves-type-distinction
Lealefoulon 29e4968
Merge branch 'main' into feat/improves-type-distinction
Lealefoulon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ça introduit une différence de nommage entre le code ("description") et le langage oral qu'on utilisera ("intitulé"), ce qui n'est pas bon à moyen-long terme (principe du DDD : ubiquitous language = 1 même langage utilisé par tout le monde, + le code doit refléter la terminologie métier)
Peut-être qu'il faudrait en profiter pour renommer le champ en
title
, mais dans ce cas-là le faire dans une PR séparée ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok pour faire ça dans une PR séparée ! Donc il faudrait même changer en base de données le nom du champ dans la table c'est bien ce que tu voulais dire @florimondmanca ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oui dans l'idéal... cc @mmarchois
Ça peut aussi te faire un exercice de refacto :) (renommer un champ ça arrive)