Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementing matrix strategy to speed up gha-only tests #28

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

seankross
Copy link
Collaborator

@seankross seankross commented Dec 17, 2024

Sorry for splitting hairs but I feel like this is the better implementation practice compared to #22. Looking for approval from both @tefirman and @sckott before merging. Also sorry for the sloppy merging. If this gets approval I will close #22.

@seankross seankross marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 20:00
@seankross seankross changed the title try matrix Implementing matrix strategy to speed up gha-only tests Dec 17, 2024
@seankross seankross requested review from tefirman and sckott December 17, 2024 22:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@sckott sckott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a few comments

.github/workflows/cromwell-test-run.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@seankross seankross mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2024
11 tasks
@seankross seankross requested review from tefirman and sckott December 18, 2024 22:55
Copy link
Collaborator

@sckott sckott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sweet, run times are looking good, and seems like total time won't get much bigger when adding more wdls given the matrix approach

Copy link
Collaborator

@tefirman tefirman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great call on making the inputs.json and options.json optional. Looks great, thanks @seankross !

@seankross seankross merged commit 1e6926c into main Dec 18, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants