This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
#290 fix truth/test data errors #314
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Binary file modified
BIN
-23.3 KB
(77%)
military-symbology-styles/test-data/app6b/gdbs/ComprehensiveTestData.gdb.zip
Binary file not shown.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
This ArcGIS File GeoDatabase (FGDB) contains an example of each APP-6(B) symbol type. |
Binary file added
BIN
+251 KB
military-symbology-styles/test-data/app6b/pro-projects/App6bComprehensiveTestData.ppkx
Binary file not shown.
Binary file removed
BIN
-167 KB
military-symbology-styles/test-data/app6b/pro-projects/App6bComprehensiveTestDataPoints.ppkx
Binary file not shown.
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion
5
military-symbology-styles/test-data/app6b/pro-projects/Readme.md
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ | ||
This ArcGIS Pro Project Package contains an example of each APP-6(B) symbol type. | ||
|
||
|
||
IMPORTANT NOTE: | ||
|
||
As of Pro 2.1, APP-6(B) is not currently supported so this data is drawn using the MIL-STD-2525C renderer. Therefore, not all symbols will draw currently. Once supported, the renderer can be changed to APP-6(B). | ||
The ArcGIS Pro Project Package requires Pro 2.2+ to open. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@csmoore @BobBooth Just confirming the order an item shows up in the list doesn't affect anything else? I suspect the answer is no, just making sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ACueva - order of items shouldn't matter - but they will appear in this same order in the output feature class when run through the test generation process