-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for T30S Pro Omni (xco2fc) #662
Conversation
Add support for T30S Pro Omni
Warning Rate limit exceeded@edenhaus has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughA new file named Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/xco2fc.py
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/xco2fc.py
1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
1-1: Undefined name p1jij8
(F821)
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
p1jij8.py |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Invalid file content and missing implementation
The file appears to be incorrectly created:
- The content "p1jij8.py" is not valid Python code
- The implementation for T30S Pro Omni support is missing
- The file needs proper Python module structure with necessary imports, classes, and functions
Would you like help with:
- Creating a proper Python module structure for T30S Pro Omni support?
- Implementing the necessary classes and methods?
Please confirm if this was an accidental commit or if you need assistance with the implementation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
1-1: Undefined name p1jij8
(F821)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also valid for T30S Pro
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alessandrobenevelli, thank you for the clarification that the code is also valid for the T30S Pro. However, it appears that the file xco2fc.py
currently contains only the text p1jij8.py
, which may not be the intended content. To properly add support for the T30S Pro Omni, you might want to include the necessary Python module structure with imports, classes, and functions.
Here's a basic structure that might help:
# xco2fc.py
from deebot_client.hardware.deebot import Device, StaticDeviceInfo
from deebot_client.hardware.capabilities import (
BatteryCapability,
CleaningCapability,
ErrorCapability,
FanSpeedCapability,
# ... add other necessary capabilities
)
class T30SProOmni(Device):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# Initialize capabilities
self.add_capability(BatteryCapability())
self.add_capability(CleaningCapability())
# ... initialize other capabilities as needed
DEVICE_INFO = StaticDeviceInfo(
name="T30S Pro Omni",
model="xco2fc",
device_class=T30SProOmni,
capabilities=[
BatteryCapability,
CleaningCapability,
ErrorCapability,
FanSpeedCapability,
# ... list other capabilities
],
)
# Register the device
DEVICES["xco2fc"] = DEVICE_INFO
This template provides a starting point for implementing the support for the T30S Pro Omni. You can customize the capabilities and functionality according to the device's specifications.
Let me know if there's anything else I can assist you with!
(_/)
(•ᴗ•)
( ) I'm excited to see the T30S Pro Omni support added!
Add the config in the file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/xco2fc.py
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/xco2fc.py (3)
98-198
: Well-structured implementation with comprehensive capabilities
The implementation follows good practices:
- Complete set of device capabilities
- Proper error handling and state monitoring
- Comprehensive life span monitoring
- Well-organized configuration structure
The overall architecture looks solid, pending verification of the device-specific capabilities mentioned in the previous comment.
98-198
: Verify device capabilities configuration
Please verify that the configured capabilities match the T30S Pro Omni specifications, particularly:
- Fan speed levels (QUIET, NORMAL, MAX, MAX_PLUS)
- Water amount levels (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, ULTRAHIGH)
- Available work modes (MOP, MOP_AFTER_VACUUM, VACUUM, VACUUM_AND_MOP)
✅ Verification successful
Capabilities configuration appears consistent with other models
Based on the analysis of similar device configurations in the codebase:
- Fan speed levels (QUIET, NORMAL, MAX, MAX_PLUS) are consistently used across multiple models
- Water amount levels (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, ULTRAHIGH) are standard across most advanced models
- Work modes (MOP, MOP_AFTER_VACUUM, VACUUM, VACUUM_AND_MOP) are consistent with other hybrid vacuum/mop models
The configuration appears to be in line with other high-end Deebot models that support both vacuuming and mopping capabilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any existing T30S Pro Omni documentation or similar models
# Look for documentation files
echo "Searching for documentation files..."
fd -e md -e txt -e rst . | xargs rg -i "t30s|pro|omni" -C2
# Look for similar device configurations
echo "Searching for similar device configurations..."
rg -l "FanSpeedLevel|WaterAmount|WorkMode" ./deebot_client/hardware/deebot/
Length of output: 31835
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the configurations of similar devices to verify the capabilities
# Check fan speed levels in other device configurations
echo "Checking fan speed configurations..."
rg "FanSpeedLevel\." ./deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ -B2 -A2
# Check water amount levels in other device configurations
echo "Checking water amount configurations..."
rg "WaterAmount\." ./deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ -B2 -A2
# Check work modes in other device configurations
echo "Checking work mode configurations..."
rg "WorkMode\." ./deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ -B2 -A2
Length of output: 17519
1-198
: Verify file naming convention
Please confirm if xco2fc
is the correct model-specific identifier for the T30S Pro Omni. This is important for maintaining consistency in the codebase.
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ | |||
"""Deebot T20 Omni Capabilities.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix incorrect device model in docstring
The docstring mentions "T20 Omni" but this PR is intended to add support for "T30S Pro Omni". Please update the docstring to reflect the correct device model.
-"""Deebot T20 Omni Capabilities."""
+"""Deebot T30S Pro Omni Capabilities."""
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
"""Deebot T20 Omni Capabilities.""" | |
"""Deebot T30S Pro Omni Capabilities.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change the code of the file
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #662 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.01% 86.14% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 93 94 +1
Lines 3454 3487 +33
Branches 307 307
==========================================
+ Hits 2971 3004 +33
Misses 429 429
Partials 54 54 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @elpigeondindo 👍
Add support for T30S Pro Omni
Summary by CodeRabbit