Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Auto Pass Props if User Controls 100% of Voting power #759

Closed
JakeHartnell opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Auto Pass Props if User Controls 100% of Voting power #759

JakeHartnell opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
feature A new exciting feature. good-first-issue Issue that is good for first.

Comments

@JakeHartnell
Copy link
Member

As a user setting up DAOs before adding other members, it would be quicker to auto-pass a proposal if I control 100% of the voting power.

In the dao-proposal-single contract, if a user has 100% of the voting power auto-pass the proposal.
@JakeHartnell JakeHartnell added good-first-issue Issue that is good for first. feature A new exciting feature. labels Nov 2, 2023
@nickf12 nickf12 mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2023
Closed
nickf12 added a commit to nickf12/dao-contracts that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2023
@nickf12
Auto Pass Props if User Controls 100% of Voting power DA0-DA0#759
dc085a3
nickf12 added a commit to nickf12/dao-contracts that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2023
@nickf12
Revert " Auto Pass Props if User Controls 100% of Voting power DA0-DA…
11e6e9a 
…0#759"

This reverts commit dc085a3.
@NoahSaso
Copy link
Member

NoahSaso commented Feb 1, 2024

closing in favor of #798 per the discussion in #776

@NoahSaso NoahSaso closed this as completed Feb 1, 2024
@NoahSaso NoahSaso mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature A new exciting feature. good-first-issue Issue that is good for first.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JakeHartnell @NoahSaso