make sure get request_id before body chunk #5611
Conversation
|
@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Your build has completed! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/utils/stream.ts (1)
89-90: Remove unnecessary optional chaining forsetRequestIdSince
setRequestIdis assigned before it's used, the optional chaining?.is unnecessary. Removing it can simplify the code.Apply this diff to simplify the function call:
-setRequestId?.(request_id); +setRequestId(request_id);This ensures that the call to
setRequestId(request_id);is straightforward, assuming thatsetRequestIdis always defined at this point in the code.
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (1)
- app/utils/stream.ts (3 hunks)
π§° Additional context used
πͺ Biome
app/utils/stream.ts
[error] 32-32: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 31-31: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
| let setRequestId: Function | undefined; | ||
| const requestIdPromise = new Promise((resolve) => (setRequestId = resolve)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor to avoid using 'Function' type and assignment within expression
The use of Function as a type is discouraged because it lacks specificity and can lead to type safety issues. Additionally, assigning setRequestId within the expression can be confusing and may lead to unintended side effects.
Apply this diff to define the function type explicitly and refactor the assignment:
-let setRequestId: Function | undefined;
-const requestIdPromise = new Promise((resolve) => (setRequestId = resolve));
+let setRequestId!: (requestId: number) => void;
+const requestIdPromise = new Promise<number>((resolve) => {
+ setRequestId = resolve;
+});This change:
- Defines
setRequestIdwith a specific function type(requestId: number) => void. - Moves the assignment of
setRequestIdoutside of the expression for clarity. - Ensures better type safety and readability.
π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let setRequestId: Function | undefined; | |
| const requestIdPromise = new Promise((resolve) => (setRequestId = resolve)); | |
| let setRequestId!: (requestId: number) => void; | |
| const requestIdPromise = new Promise<number>((resolve) => { | |
| setRequestId = resolve; | |
| }); |
π§° Tools
πͺ Biome
[error] 32-32: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 31-31: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes