Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hotfix for statusText is non ISO-8859-1 #5717 #5719

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

lloydzhou
Copy link
Contributor

@lloydzhou lloydzhou commented Oct 25, 2024

πŸ’» ε˜ζ›΄η±»εž‹ | Change Type

  • feat
  • fix
  • refactor
  • perf
  • style
  • test
  • docs
  • ci
  • chore
  • build

πŸ”€ ε˜ζ›΄θ―΄ζ˜Ž | Description of Change

πŸ“ θ‘₯充俑息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling during requests by standardizing error responses.
    • Enhanced clarity in how error messages are emitted to the client, allowing for better debugging and user awareness.
    • Transitioned from an exception-based error handling approach to a response-based approach in the fetch function.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 25, 2024

@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@lloydzhou has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review.

βŒ› How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

πŸ“₯ Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c74559 and 90ced92.

Walkthrough

The changes made in this pull request focus on enhancing the error handling logic within the stream_fetch function located in src-tauri/src/stream.rs. The error response mechanism has been standardized by replacing specific error messages with a static string "Error". Additionally, the refactored error handling now includes an asynchronous task that emits the error message to the client as a ChunkPayload, improving the clarity and consistency of error responses. Similar modifications were made to the fetch function in app/utils/stream.ts, transitioning from an exception-based error handling to a response-based approach.

Changes

File Change Summary
src-tauri/src/stream.rs Modified stream_fetch function to standardize error responses and refactor error handling to emit error messages as ChunkPayload.
app/utils/stream.ts Updated fetch function to comment out the throw statement in error handling, returning a Response object with a status code of 599 instead.

Possibly related PRs

  • make sure get request_id before body chunkΒ #5611: This PR modifies the fetch function in app/utils/stream.ts, which is directly related to the changes in the stream_fetch function in src-tauri/src/stream.rs as both involve error handling and response streaming mechanisms.

Suggested labels

enhancement, help wanted

Suggested reviewers

  • Leizhenpeng
  • Dogtiti

Poem

πŸ‡ In the stream where errors flow,
A message now, just "Error," we show.
With chunks that emit, clear and bright,
Our clients will know, all will be right!
Hopping along, with clarity we play,
Error handling's better, hip-hip-hooray! πŸŽ‰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src-tauri/src/stream.rs (1)

132-137: Consider using standard HTTP status code

The change to use static "Error" for status_text is good as it ensures ISO-8859-1 compliance. However, 599 is a non-standard HTTP status code.

Consider using a standard HTTP status code:

       StreamResponse {
         request_id,
-        status: 599,
+        status: 500, // Internal Server Error
         status_text: "Error".to_string(),
         headers: HashMap::new(),
       }
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4745706 and e3ca7e8.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • src-tauri/src/stream.rs (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
src-tauri/src/stream.rs (1)

122-137: Verify ISO-8859-1 compliance across the codebase

Let's verify that all status text usage in the codebase is ISO-8859-1 compliant.

βœ… Verification successful

Status text values are ISO-8859-1 compliant

The codebase only uses two status text values:

  • "OK" for successful responses
  • "Error" for error responses

Both strings contain only ASCII characters which are a subset of ISO-8859-1, making them compliant with the standard.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any status_text assignments in the codebase
rg -l 'status_text.*=|status_text:' --type rust

# Search for potential non-ASCII string literals being assigned
ast-grep --pattern 'status_text = $_' --lang rust

Length of output: 125


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get full context of status_text usage in stream.rs
rg -A 5 -B 5 'status_text.*=|status_text:' src-tauri/src/stream.rs

# Search for struct definition containing status_text
ast-grep --pattern 'struct $_ {
  $$$
  status_text: $_,
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 815

src-tauri/src/stream.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/utils/stream.ts (1)

103-104: Consider logging error details for debugging.

While we avoid sending non ISO-8859-1 characters in the response, it would be helpful to log the original error for debugging purposes.

 .catch((e) => {
-  console.error("stream error", e);
+  console.error("[Stream Fetch Error]", {
+    url,
+    error: e?.message || String(e),
+    timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
+  });
   return new Response("", { status: 599 });
 });
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

πŸ“₯ Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3ca7e8 and 2c74559.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/utils/stream.ts (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
app/utils/stream.ts (1)

103-104: Verify error handling in dependent code.

The switch from throwing errors to returning Response objects with status 599 represents a breaking change in error handling behavior.

Let's verify the usage of this fetch function to ensure all callers can handle the new error response pattern:

βœ… Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the error handling patterns in the codebase.

This will help us understand:

  1. How the stream utility is imported and used
  2. The error handling patterns around fetch calls
  3. The broader context of the modified error handling in stream.ts

Let me gather more specific information about the usage of this fetch function and its error handling context.

This will help us understand:

  1. Which files import and use this fetch function
  2. If there's any explicit handling of the 599 status code
  3. The complete function context where this fetch is implemented

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

The error handling change appears to be safe and localized

The modification from throwing errors to returning a Response with status 599 is actually an implementation detail that doesn't impact dependent code because:

  1. The error handling occurs in a .catch() block within a stream-specific fetch wrapper
  2. No other files directly import or reference this specific fetch implementation
  3. The function still returns a Response object in both success and error cases, maintaining a consistent interface

The change makes the error handling more consistent by always returning a Response object rather than mixing thrown errors and responses.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of the fetch function
rg -l "fetch\(" app/

# Look for catch blocks that might expect the old error throwing behavior
ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1106


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how the fetch from stream.ts is imported and used
rg -A 5 "from.*stream'" app/

# Look for catch blocks specifically around fetch calls
rg -B 2 -A 5 "fetch\(.*\).*\{.*\}.*catch" app/

# Check the implementation context of the modified fetch function
rg -B 10 -A 10 "return new Response" app/utils/stream.ts

Length of output: 466


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for imports of fetch from stream.ts
rg "import.*from.*stream'" app/

# Check for any error handling or status code checks for 599
rg -B 3 -A 3 "status.*599|599.*status" app/

# Look for the function definition containing this fetch
ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($_) {
  $$$
  fetch($$$)
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 478

app/utils/stream.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@lloydzhou lloydzhou requested a review from Dogtiti October 25, 2024 10:19
Copy link
Contributor

Your build has completed!

Preview deployment

@lloydzhou lloydzhou merged commit 8299484 into ChatGPTNextWeb:main Oct 25, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants