Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(v3): Support logging in to multiple API ML instances #3019
feat(v3): Support logging in to multiple API ML instances #3019
Changes from all commits
3ea00c9
f4d384d
08691dd
975f470
e76b10a
71fb285
862e450
6a6fa79
e6b9a4b
393169e
03cf499
cdc5e58
a2f1d12
4708616
8c5390d
7898854
abaf074
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we add this new behavior to the changelog as a new breaking change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question about this line here.
In order for this function to return the default base profile (old behavior), the token only needs to be in the secure array of the base profile and not actually stored in the vault. Is that assumption correct?
Follow up question, Does that means that this function will return the default base profile even if I already have a token stored in the parent profile?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good questions, sorry I didn't see this until after the PR was merged. Your assumption is correct 😁
For the 2nd question, that's right. I think the reason was for backwards compatibility - however we probably want to give precedence to whichever profile has tokenValue already defined 😋