Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(integer): addition test based on trivial inputs #1484

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

tmontaigu
Copy link
Contributor

This adds overflowing_add and add tests that
are on trivial inputs. As these are faster to run they can be more extensive than on true encryptions

This also binds the advanced_add_assign functions tests to include overflow computation

On a standard laptop with 1 test thread it takes ~7 minutes to run these trivial tests

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Aug 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@IceTDrinker IceTDrinker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small question otherwise looks good

This adds `overflowing_add` and `add` tests that
are on trivial inputs. As these are faster to run they
can be more extensive than on true encryptions

This also binds the advanced_add_assign functions tests
to include overflow computation

On a standard laptop with 1 test thread it takes ~7 minutes
to run these trivial tests
@tmontaigu tmontaigu force-pushed the tm/extensive-trivial-add branch from d39c35c to ed5d028 Compare August 23, 2024 08:15
Copy link
Member

@IceTDrinker IceTDrinker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@tmontaigu tmontaigu merged commit 456d0ce into main Aug 23, 2024
88 checks passed
@tmontaigu tmontaigu deleted the tm/extensive-trivial-add branch August 23, 2024 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants