-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added a new detector for catching unsupported COPY command structure #2106
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c7e1930
Added a new detector for catching unsupported COPY command structure
ShivanshGahlot 038fd11
Fixed errors after rebase
ShivanshGahlot 1069f60
Fixed errors after rebase
ShivanshGahlot e387953
Added a few more unit tests
ShivanshGahlot f70de4d
Added the suggested changes
ShivanshGahlot be6ca71
Added COPY FROM ... WHERE to end to end assessment test, COPY ... ON_…
ShivanshGahlot e687c7d
Fixed issues after rebase
ShivanshGahlot a417d93
Fixed issues after rebase
ShivanshGahlot 3a6915f
Fixed issues after rebase
ShivanshGahlot 5eace08
Fixes after rebase
ShivanshGahlot 06ab585
Fixing tests
ShivanshGahlot f22d7c6
Made suggested changes
ShivanshGahlot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Simplified code from what I was discussing in the morning:
I tried running your tests and they all passed, but do take a deeper look!
cc: @sanyamsinghal @priyanshi-yb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think yes this makes sense. It reduces the number of lines and readable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets stick to protomsg for this codepath, reason being the required info is not directly availabe in the struct and extraction of defElem can be generic and reused multiple times.
It can be simplified like this using existing helper functions:
Refer my PR for
TraverseAndExtractDefNamesFromDefElem
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just to be on the same page, there are two different issues here.
For the first one, isFrom and whereClause are directly available in
CopyStmt
struct, so would prefer dealing with the struct directly for that issue. ButGetMessageField(msg, "is_from"
isn't too bad either from a readability standpoint. I'll leave it up to you.For the DefElem one, we can use the new function that Sanyam is introducing, but then you'll have to wait until that PR is merged.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had to add a new function GetBoolField() for the is_from clause. I have used the GetMessageField and GetBoolField approach rn for the first one.
For the second one, I have used Sanyam's function in my PR.