refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in ir_native.cpp.
#104
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lint-tasks.yml (1)
115-115: LGTM! Consider documenting the gradual expansion of clang-tidy coverageThe addition of the modules directory to the clang-tidy source paths aligns with the PR objective. The path is correctly formatted using the template variable.
Consider adding a comment above the SRC_PATHS section documenting the strategy for gradually expanding clang-tidy coverage across the codebase, as indicated by the TODO comment above.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
lint-tasks.yml(1 hunks)src/clp_ffi_py/modules/ir_native.cpp(2 hunks)src/wrapped_facade_headers/Python.hpp(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/clp_ffi_py/modules/ir_native.cpp
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/wrapped_facade_headers/Python.hpp (1)
Pattern **/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,ts,tsx}: - Prefer false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/wrapped_facade_headers/Python.hpp (1)
28-28: LGTM! Verify if this header is required by ir_native.cpp
The addition of moduleobject.h is properly placed within the IWYU pragma block and the linting conditional. This change appears to be related to the clang-tidy fixes in ir_native.cpp.
Let's verify if this header is actually used in ir_native.cpp:
✅ Verification successful
The moduleobject.h header is required for ir_native.cpp
The verification confirms that ir_native.cpp uses PyModule_Create() function, which is defined in moduleobject.h. While the header isn't directly included in ir_native.cpp, it's properly included through the wrapped facade header, making it available for the module creation functionality used in the code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if moduleobject.h is used in ir_native.cpp
# Expected: Find references to module-related Python C API functions
rg -A 3 "PyModule_" "src/clp_ffi_py/modules/ir_native.cpp"
Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if moduleobject.h is already included in ir_native.cpp
rg -B 2 -A 2 "moduleobject\.h" "src/clp_ffi_py/modules/ir_native.cpp"
# Also check for any other module-related includes
rg "^#include.*module.*\.h" "src/clp_ffi_py/modules/ir_native.cpp"
Length of output: 136
Description
This is one of the PR series trying to implement #96
This PR fixes all clang-tidy warnings in
ir_native.cpp.Validation performed
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
modulesdirectory.Bug Fixes
Documentation