Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tasks to perform linting including checking YAML files. #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Oct 2, 2024

Description

This PR adds Taskfile tasks for linting:

# Checks for linting violations
task lint:check

# Checks and fixes any fixable linting violations
task lint:fix

It currently includes linting for YAML files which can be run specifically with:

task yml:check
# or
task yml:fix

More linters will added in future PRs along with a GitHub workflow to run them.

NOTE:

  • The code is largely based on lint-tasks.yml and lint-requirements.txt from log-surgeon.
  • We should be naming our files with the ".yaml" extension as encouraged by the RFC. but for consistency with Taskfile.yml, I'm leaving the added lint-tasks.yml as is.

Validation performed

  • Added a trailing space in Taskfile.yml
  • Validated that task lint:check detected the error.
  • Validated that task lint:fix detected the error (yamllint doesn't have support for fixing any violations automatically).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Enhanced clarity in the README.md with a new "Contributing" section and subsections for "Set up" and "Linting."
  • New Features

    • Introduced a new linting task in the project, enabling checks and fixes for YAML files.
  • Chores

    • Added yamllint as a required dependency for YAML linting.
    • Created a structured configuration for linting tasks in lint-tasks.yml.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to several files to enhance project documentation and introduce linting capabilities. The README.md file has been updated to clarify the contribution process, including new subsections for setup and linting instructions. The Taskfile.yml now includes a lint task that integrates linting from a new lint-tasks.yml file. Additionally, a new dependency for the yamllint package is specified in lint-requirements.txt, and the lint-tasks.yml file defines various linting tasks and a virtual environment setup.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Renamed section from Development to Contributing; added subsections Set up and Linting.
Taskfile.yml Added a new lint task that includes linting tasks from lint-tasks.yml.
lint-requirements.txt Added dependency yamllint>=1.35.1.
lint-tasks.yml Introduced a structured configuration for linting tasks, adding check, fix, yml, and venv tasks.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • junhaoliao

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues changed the title Add tasks to perform linting including linting YAML files. Add tasks to perform linting including checking YAML files. Oct 2, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
README.md (3)

34-39: Great addition of setup instructions!

The "Set up" subsection provides clear instructions for installing Emscripten, which is crucial for contributors. To further improve this section, consider adding a brief explanation of what Emscripten is and why it's necessary for this project.

Would you like me to suggest a brief explanation to add?


40-52: Excellent addition of linting instructions!

The "Linting" subsection provides clear instructions for running linting checks and fixing issues, which aligns well with the PR objectives. This will be very helpful for contributors.

One minor suggestion:

Consider rephrasing line 49 for a more formal tone:

-To run all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues:
+To run all linting checks and automatically fix any fixable issues:
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~49-~49: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell task lint:...

(FIX_RESOLVE)


Line range hint 1-53: Consider adding a table of contents

The changes have significantly improved the README's structure and content, providing clear guidance for contributors. To further enhance navigation, especially as the document grows, consider adding a table of contents at the beginning of the README.

Would you like me to generate a sample table of contents for you?

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~49-~49: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell task lint:...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

lint-tasks.yml (4)

7-13: LGTM: Check and fix tasks are concise and clear.

The 'check' and 'fix' tasks are well-defined entry points for YAML linting operations. They delegate to specific YAML tasks, which is a good practice for maintainability.

Suggestion: Consider adding a comment indicating that these tasks may be expanded in the future to include other file types, as mentioned in the PR objectives.


15-28: LGTM: The 'yml' task is well-structured and comprehensive.

The task effectively combines check and fix operations, uses a virtual environment, and runs yamllint with appropriate configurations. The inclusion of specific files and directories for linting is good.

Suggestion: Consider making the list of files and directories to be linted configurable through variables. This would make it easier to add or remove targets in the future without modifying the task itself.


30-56: LGTM: The 'venv' task is robust and well-implemented.

The task effectively manages the creation and validation of the virtual environment using checksums. The use of utility tasks and clear variable definitions enhances maintainability.

Suggestion: Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the venv task at the beginning. This would help other developers quickly understand its role in the linting process.


1-56: LGTM: Overall structure is logical and well-organized.

The file demonstrates good organization with clear sections for different tasks. The consistent indentation and formatting contribute to excellent readability.

Suggestion: Consider standardizing the use of quotes for strings throughout the file. Currently, there's a mix of single and double quotes. Choosing one style (preferably double quotes for consistency with YAML) would further enhance the file's consistency.

Taskfile.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-124: Consider documenting the file extension convention and future plans.

The addition of linting tasks is a good start. For clarity and future maintenance:

  1. Consider adding a comment in the file about the .yml extension being used for consistency, despite the RFC guidelines favouring .yaml.
  2. It might be helpful to add a TODO comment about the planned addition of more linters and the GitHub workflow for automated linting, as mentioned in the PR objectives.

These additions would improve documentation and set clear expectations for future development.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d19be4a and 766b6c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • Taskfile.yml (1 hunks)
  • lint-requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • lint-tasks.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • lint-requirements.txt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~49-~49: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell task lint:...

(FIX_RESOLVE)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (1)

31-33: Excellent addition of a "Contributing" section!

The change from "Development" to "Contributing" is a positive one. It's more inclusive and aligns well with the goal of providing clear instructions for contributors.

lint-tasks.yml (1)

1-4: LGTM: Version and variables are well-defined.

The version is appropriately set, and the variable G_LINT_VENV_DIR is defined using a placeholder. This structure allows for flexibility in configuring the lint virtual environment directory.

Taskfile.yml (1)

4-4: LGTM! The linting tasks are correctly included.

The addition of the lint task from lint-tasks.yml is consistent with the PR objectives and follows the existing structure of the Taskfile. This change will enable linting capabilities as intended.

Let's verify the existence of the lint-tasks.yml file:

✅ Verification successful

Verification Successful: lint-tasks.yml is present.

The lint task has been properly included, and the corresponding lint-tasks.yml file exists in the repository. This ensures that linting capabilities are correctly integrated as intended.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of lint-tasks.yml

# Test: Check if lint-tasks.yml exists
if [ -f "lint-tasks.yml" ]; then
    echo "lint-tasks.yml exists"
else
    echo "lint-tasks.yml does not exist"
fi

Length of output: 80

Copy link
Member

@junhaoliao junhaoliao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Validated both task lint:fix and task lint:check as per the validation instructions in the PR description.
  • The Taskfile.yml was checked against https://docs.yscope.com/dev-guide/contrib-guides-taskfiles.html and no violation was found.
  • Not sure if we want to follow "Conventional Commits"; if not the PR title is fine for the final commit message.

@kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member Author

Not sure if we want to follow "Conventional Commits"; if not the PR title is fine for the final commit message.

Forgot how specific "Conventional Commits" was. Maybe we can adopt it in the future (with a workflow to ease adoption).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants