-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tasks to perform linting including checking YAML files. #13
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to several files to enhance project documentation and introduce linting capabilities. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
README.md (3)
34-39
: Great addition of setup instructions!The "Set up" subsection provides clear instructions for installing Emscripten, which is crucial for contributors. To further improve this section, consider adding a brief explanation of what Emscripten is and why it's necessary for this project.
Would you like me to suggest a brief explanation to add?
40-52
: Excellent addition of linting instructions!The "Linting" subsection provides clear instructions for running linting checks and fixing issues, which aligns well with the PR objectives. This will be very helpful for contributors.
One minor suggestion:
Consider rephrasing line 49 for a more formal tone:
-To run all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: +To run all linting checks and automatically fix any fixable issues:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~49-~49: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell task lint:...(FIX_RESOLVE)
Line range hint
1-53
: Consider adding a table of contentsThe changes have significantly improved the README's structure and content, providing clear guidance for contributors. To further enhance navigation, especially as the document grows, consider adding a table of contents at the beginning of the README.
Would you like me to generate a sample table of contents for you?
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~49-~49: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell task lint:...(FIX_RESOLVE)
lint-tasks.yml (4)
7-13
: LGTM: Check and fix tasks are concise and clear.The 'check' and 'fix' tasks are well-defined entry points for YAML linting operations. They delegate to specific YAML tasks, which is a good practice for maintainability.
Suggestion: Consider adding a comment indicating that these tasks may be expanded in the future to include other file types, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
15-28
: LGTM: The 'yml' task is well-structured and comprehensive.The task effectively combines check and fix operations, uses a virtual environment, and runs yamllint with appropriate configurations. The inclusion of specific files and directories for linting is good.
Suggestion: Consider making the list of files and directories to be linted configurable through variables. This would make it easier to add or remove targets in the future without modifying the task itself.
30-56
: LGTM: The 'venv' task is robust and well-implemented.The task effectively manages the creation and validation of the virtual environment using checksums. The use of utility tasks and clear variable definitions enhances maintainability.
Suggestion: Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the venv task at the beginning. This would help other developers quickly understand its role in the linting process.
1-56
: LGTM: Overall structure is logical and well-organized.The file demonstrates good organization with clear sections for different tasks. The consistent indentation and formatting contribute to excellent readability.
Suggestion: Consider standardizing the use of quotes for strings throughout the file. Currently, there's a mix of single and double quotes. Choosing one style (preferably double quotes for consistency with YAML) would further enhance the file's consistency.
Taskfile.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-124
: Consider documenting the file extension convention and future plans.The addition of linting tasks is a good start. For clarity and future maintenance:
- Consider adding a comment in the file about the
.yml
extension being used for consistency, despite the RFC guidelines favouring.yaml
.- It might be helpful to add a TODO comment about the planned addition of more linters and the GitHub workflow for automated linting, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
These additions would improve documentation and set clear expectations for future development.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- Taskfile.yml (1 hunks)
- lint-requirements.txt (1 hunks)
- lint-tasks.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- lint-requirements.txt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~49-~49: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell task lint:...(FIX_RESOLVE)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (1)
31-33
: Excellent addition of a "Contributing" section!The change from "Development" to "Contributing" is a positive one. It's more inclusive and aligns well with the goal of providing clear instructions for contributors.
lint-tasks.yml (1)
1-4
: LGTM: Version and variables are well-defined.The version is appropriately set, and the variable
G_LINT_VENV_DIR
is defined using a placeholder. This structure allows for flexibility in configuring the lint virtual environment directory.Taskfile.yml (1)
4-4
: LGTM! The linting tasks are correctly included.The addition of the
lint
task fromlint-tasks.yml
is consistent with the PR objectives and follows the existing structure of the Taskfile. This change will enable linting capabilities as intended.Let's verify the existence of the
lint-tasks.yml
file:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
lint-tasks.yml
is present.The
lint
task has been properly included, and the correspondinglint-tasks.yml
file exists in the repository. This ensures that linting capabilities are correctly integrated as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of lint-tasks.yml # Test: Check if lint-tasks.yml exists if [ -f "lint-tasks.yml" ]; then echo "lint-tasks.yml exists" else echo "lint-tasks.yml does not exist" fiLength of output: 80
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Validated both
task lint:fix
andtask lint:check
as per the validation instructions in the PR description. - The Taskfile.yml was checked against https://docs.yscope.com/dev-guide/contrib-guides-taskfiles.html and no violation was found.
- Not sure if we want to follow "Conventional Commits"; if not the PR title is fine for the final commit message.
Forgot how specific "Conventional Commits" was. Maybe we can adopt it in the future (with a workflow to ease adoption). |
Description
This PR adds Taskfile tasks for linting:
It currently includes linting for YAML files which can be run specifically with:
task yml:check # or task yml:fix
More linters will added in future PRs along with a GitHub workflow to run them.
NOTE:
Validation performed
task lint:check
detected the error.task lint:fix
detected the error (yamllint doesn't have support for fixing any violations automatically).Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
README.md
with a new "Contributing" section and subsections for "Set up" and "Linting."New Features
Chores
yamllint
as a required dependency for YAML linting.lint-tasks.yml
.