state: fix -Walloc-size #401
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GCC 14 introduces a new -Walloc-size included in -Wextra which gives: ``` src/state.c:589:9: warning: allocation of insufficient size ‘1’ for type ‘struct xkb_state’ with size ‘128’ [-Walloc-size] ``` The calloc prototype is: ``` void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size); ``` So, just swap the number of members and size arguments to match the prototype, as we're initialising 1 struct of size `sizeof(struct xkb_state)`. GCC then sees we're not doing anything wrong. Signed-off-by: Sam James <[email protected]>
|
merged, thanks! |
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GCC 14 introduces a new -Walloc-size included in -Wextra which gives:
The calloc prototype is:
So, just swap the number of members and size arguments to match the prototype, as we're initialising 1 struct of size
sizeof(struct xkb_state). GCC then sees we're not doing anything wrong.