Publish Crates, Npm Package and Usage Docs

[appcypher]

Summary

This PR implements the following features

• Publish new crates.
• Publish to npm.
• Add usage examples

This PR just prepares the project for package publishing (npm, doc.rs, crates.io). Also adds usage examples.

WNFS NPM package:

• https://www.npmjs.com/package/wnfs

WNFS crates:

• https://crates.io/crates/wnfs
• https://crates.io/crates/wasm-wnfs

Examples of WNFS usage here:
JavaScript:

• https://replit.com/@appcypher/wnfs-npm-test#index.js

Rust:

• https://replit.com/@appcypher/wnfs-crate-test#src/main.rs

Test plan (required)

• N/A

Ongoing Issues

• Plan for Wasming WNFS incrementally oddsdk/ts-odd#371

Closing issues

Fixes #22

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #21 (f6a43d7) into main (8bb0fbb) will increase coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 84.04%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #21      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.91%   80.05%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         712      732      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits          569      586      +17     
- Misses        143      146       +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
crates/fs/public/file.rs	84.21% <ø> (ø)
crates/wasm/fs/public/directory.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/fs/public/directory.rs	85.33% <81.01%> (-0.75%)	⬇️
crates/fs/public/link.rs	68.00% <100.00%> (+4.00%)	⬆️
crates/fs/public/node.rs	60.52% <100.00%> (+5.98%)	⬆️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[matheus23]

Just a comment about the wnfs scripts (and generally some ideas around where to go from there with our builds scripts).
I think we should at least rename it, but other than that this is good to go!

Docs 🙌 ✨

[matheus23]

Maybe we should rename the script in order to avoid confusion with a potential wnfs CLI that actually reads and writes WNFS similar to what the ipfs CLI is doing today.

Or we could go for a Justfile which is similar to a makefile, but simpler. We're using it in a lot of other places at fission.

And lastly we could go for a nix version, but that's way more involved to set up compared to a justfile.

[appcypher]

I was considering make but had issues with it in the past. Just looks like an improved make. I'm going to switch to it later.
I agree with renaming it. Maybe rs-wnfs because it is specific to the repo?

[matheus23]

How about build-wnfs.sh? Or maybe make-wnfs?

[matheus23]

rs-wnfs fine too probably.