feat: Sync other users after personal to team migration - cherrypick (WPB-14871) 🍒

[github-actions]

WPB-14871 [Android] Guest label for personal users only shown after migration once conversation is opened

This PR was automatically cherry-picked based on the following PR:

• feat: Sync other users after personal to team migration - RC (WPB-14871) #3206

Original PR description:

---

---

PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

• The PR Title

  • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
  • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
  • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³

• The PR Description

  • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

---

What's new in this PR?

Issues

After migration from personal to team account, guest label is not displayed for users that are not in the team that is recently created.

Causes (Optional)

User type s not updated after migration, it stays as NONE.

Solutions

Sync other users to get the correct users type

Dependencies (Optional)

If there are some other pull requests related to this one (e.g. new releases of frameworks), specify them here.

Needs releases with:

• GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

• I have added automated test to this contribution

How to Test

Briefly describe how this change was tested and if applicable the exact steps taken to verify that it works as expected.

Notes (Optional)

Specify here any other facts that you think are important for this issue.

Attachments (Optional)

Attachments like images, videos, etc. (drag and drop in the text box)

---

PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

• Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

---

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

• If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

---

References

1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Test Results

3 378 tests  ±0   3 271 ✅ ±0   5m 12s ⏱️ -8s
  580 suites ±0     107 💤 ±0 
  580 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e777c4e. ± Comparison against base commit 6ddef73.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Branch	Guest-label-for-personal-users-not-shown-after-migration-cherry-pick
Testbed	ubuntu-latest

⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!

Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.

• Latency (nanoseconds (ns))

Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the --ci-only-thresholds CLI flag.

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Latency	microseconds (µs)
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInFiles	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	681.47
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.logic.CoreLogicBenchmark.createObjectInMemory	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	339,579.15
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.messageInsertionBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	1,330,039.38
com.wire.kalium.benchmarks.persistence.MessagesNoPragmaTuneBenchmark.queryMessagesBenchmark	📈 view plot ⚠️ NO THRESHOLD	22,433.73

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[datadog-wireapp]

Datadog Report

Branch report: Guest-label-for-personal-users-not-shown-after-migration-cherry-pick
Commit report: 3d1a564
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3271 Passed, 107 Skipped, 1m 0.21s Total Time

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.10%. Comparing base (6ddef73) to head (e777c4e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3207      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    54.11%   54.10%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files         1264     1264              
  Lines        36800    36802       +2     
  Branches      3735     3735              
===========================================
- Hits         19915    19912       -3     
- Misses       15446    15450       +4     
- Partials      1439     1440       +1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../com/wire/kalium/logic/data/user/UserRepository.kt	68.04% <100.00%> (ø)
...user/migration/MigrateFromPersonalToTeamUseCase.kt	81.81% <100.00%> (+1.17%)	⬆️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6ddef73...e777c4e. Read the comment docs.