Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

File report on Normative references to discontinued specs in Navigation Timing Level 2 #698

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dontcallmedom-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was automatically created by Strudy upon detecting errors in Normative references to discontinued specs in Navigation Timing Level 2.

Please check that these errors were correctly detected, and that they have not already been reported in https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing.

If everything is OK, you can merge this pull request which will report the issue below to the repo, and update the underlying report file with a link to the said issue.


Title: Normative references to discontinued specs in Navigation Timing Level 2
Tracked: N/A
Repo: 'https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing'

While crawling Navigation Timing Level 2, the following normative references were detected as pointing to discontinued specifications:

This issue was detected and reported semi-automatically by Strudy based on data collected in webref.

Copy link
Member

@dontcallmedom dontcallmedom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm... the only time this is referenced is in a note section, so it shouldn't count as a normative reference - not sure why ReSpec doesn't do that automatically.

Doesn't look useful to file in this current shape in any case

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Aug 28, 2024

hmm... the only time this is referenced is in a note section, so it shouldn't count as a normative reference - not sure why ReSpec doesn't do that automatically.

There are a number of links to "HTTP Cache" that are really just links to RFC7234 (and should probably re-written as such, because it is not good practice to have an "HTTP Cache" link to the entry in the references section), for example in fetchStart. These links are all in the Obsolete section, but then this section remains normative.

Doesn't look useful to file in this current shape in any case

I don't disagree that something more specific about the above links would be better!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants