Skip to content

Issues: w3c/pwpub

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

18 Open 19 Closed
18 Open 19 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Borken specification document (infinite spinner in the top right corner, console errors)
#51 opened May 6, 2020 by danielweck
Packages vs WP Address propose closing
#49 opened Jun 3, 2019 by llemeurfr
3
ESCAPE Workshop topic:google-web-packaging Issues related to the Google Web Packaging format https://github.com/WICG/webpackage
#48 opened May 10, 2019 by llemeurfr
4
Packages vs canonical id status:need group decision
#47 opened May 7, 2019 by llemeurfr
5
What is the origin of a packaged publication?
#45 opened Apr 30, 2019 by iherman
11
Ensure text equivalent for accessibility propose closing
#44 opened Mar 12, 2019 by avneeshsingh
13
(Admin) Reorg repository priority:high
#40 opened Mar 9, 2019 by iherman
Proposed changes to 2.2 priority:high
#38 opened Feb 18, 2019 by iherman
@mattgarrish @TzviyaSiegman
@GarthConboy @wareid @llemeurfr
6
Should the packaging spec include processor conformance requirements? priority:high
#36 opened Feb 3, 2019 by llemeurfr
8
Font obfuscation in PWP status:need group decision
#28 opened Dec 27, 2018 by llemeurfr
4
FYI: Web Packaging discussions at Mozilla topic:google-web-packaging Issues related to the Google Web Packaging format https://github.com/WICG/webpackage
#27 opened Mar 13, 2018 by iherman
Update authority propose closing
#26 opened Mar 7, 2018 by BigBlueHat
2
Is "signing as an origin" sufficient? topic:google-web-packaging Issues related to the Google Web Packaging format https://github.com/WICG/webpackage
#25 opened Mar 7, 2018 by BigBlueHat
2
Is "Indexed by URL" sufficient? topic:google-web-packaging Issues related to the Google Web Packaging format https://github.com/WICG/webpackage
#24 opened Mar 7, 2018 by BigBlueHat
Review WebPackage PWP use cases topic:google-web-packaging Issues related to the Google Web Packaging format https://github.com/WICG/webpackage
#23 opened Feb 2, 2018 by BigBlueHat
Do we need a dedicated media type and file extension for PWP? status:need group decision
#17 opened Dec 5, 2017 by HadrienGardeur
19
Should the PWP document refer to the full HTTP Payload? topic:google-web-packaging Issues related to the Google Web Packaging format https://github.com/WICG/webpackage
#14 opened Dec 4, 2017 by iherman
7
What Packaging Format/Style Should a PWP Use? status:need group decision
#11 opened Nov 27, 2017 by prototypo
8
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.