Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: Consistent manifest naming #1099

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 15, 2023
Merged

Editorial: Consistent manifest naming #1099

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

christianliebel
Copy link
Member

@christianliebel christianliebel commented Sep 24, 2023

Changes all occurrences of "Web App Manifest" to "Web Application Manifest", as the spec was renamed at some point.

Closes #???

This change (choose at least one, delete ones that don't apply):

  • Makes editorial changes (changes informative sections, or changes normative sections without changing behavior)
  • Is a "chore" (metadata, formatting, fixing warnings, etc).

Commit message: Editorial: ensure consistency in manifest naming

(Fill in. If making normative changes, describe exactly what the behavioral
difference will be.)

Person merging, please make sure that commits are squashed with one of the following as a commit message prefix:

  • chore:
  • editorial:
  • BREAKING CHANGE:
  • And use none if it's a normative change

Preview | Diff

@christianliebel christianliebel changed the title Consistent manifest naming Editorial: Consistent manifest naming Sep 24, 2023
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres merged commit f54c962 into main Nov 15, 2023
1 check passed
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres deleted the app-consistency branch November 15, 2023 03:48
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2023
SHA: f54c962
Reason: push, by marcoscaceres

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants